This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
The Green Party have just the one MP and even if you didn't know it wouldn't be hard to guess that it was in Brighton where the quirky inhabitants are happy to vote for an equally quirky party. The Greens also controlled Brighton council until they made such an almighty mess of it that at the next elections the quirky locals couldn't take any more and went back to Labour. Brighton under the Greens came almost bottom of the councils' recycling league as their record was so poor. So much for the environmentally friendly party That's not why I'm voting for them. I'm voting for them because their candidate standing in my constituency have an excellent record of projects that have affected the people of Reading and protecting local services and representing their community at the council. I could care less about Green issues and environment - They won my vote because they actually tried to represent me on a local level. When I contacted them about the Swimming pool and Child centre closures, they were already involved. When we started the campaign to save the After Dark, they got directly involved. Even without control of the council or having a sitting MP, they're making the effort.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Corbyn isn't going to be Prime Minister. His style of politics just isn't going to take Tory seats. You are just making yourself look dim. If Labour get above a 34 percent vote share I'll be surprised. I think Labour could claim a hung parliament as a massive victory.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I think Labour could claim a hung parliament as a massive victory. Oh god...not Jamie as well! It isn't going to happen.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
There is no need to worry if you are earning over £80,000 a year and that 3% will obviously mean that you will be only just 'getting by'.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Corbyn isn't going to be Prime Minister. His style of politics just isn't going to take Tory seats. This is a fair comment. I guess it will come down to how many centre-ish Tory voters will "hold their noses" and vote Tory despite the contempt for the average person that May and her manifesto clearly evidence. Not as many of these now as May was perhaps banking on a month ago, I'd bet.
Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune) |
|
|
May doesn't value these head to head(s) debates but Amber Rudd can do it instead.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
May doesn't value these head to head(s) debates but Amber Rudd can do it instead. This is possibly the worst debate I have ever seen. I really hope these US-style "presidential shows" die a death. Poorly chaired, highly partisan audience, no point other than to pontificate and virtue signal. May was wise to stay the hell away.
|
|
|
Nuttall comes across as a thick racist thug.
|
|
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by europalace
Nuttall comes across as a thick racist thug. Really? I think the odious SNP guy does though.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Really? I think the odious SNP guy does though. Yes really. He's way out of his depth and shows it time after time by pointing his finger in a 'I can't debate' manner.
|
|
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by europalace
Yes really. He's way out of his depth and shows it time after time by pointing his finger in a 'I can't debate' manner. Do you call the naive nonsense that Lucas is coming out with 'debate'?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
This is possibly the worst debate I have ever seen. I really hope these US-style "presidential shows" die a death. Poorly chaired, highly partisan audience, no point other than to pontificate and virtue signal. May was wise to stay the hell away. Wasn't the programme opened with a clear statement of how "a well known polling agency" had carefully selected the audience to be as balanced as possible? I agree with you that May was wise to stay away - Amber Rudd is being monstered but it's not her who's the figurehead of the Tory campaign.
Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune) |
|
|
Originally posted by europalace
Nuttall comes across as a thick racist thug. Whereas the audience come across as just thick thugs.
|
|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Do you call the naive nonsense that Lucas is coming out with 'debate'? well, on a relative level Nuttall shouldn't be there. He's clearly not educated or experienced enough to be anywhere near this kind of exposure, truy an embarrassment but no surprise really.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
Whereas the audience come across as just thick thugs.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.