Nick's a firestarter, twisted firestarter.
Nick's the bitch you hated, filth infatuated.

Well I think I can clear this up. Everyone, almost, who ever lived, and will ever live, is a c**t. The top set of 'almost a c**t' featuring 99.999999% c**ts are politicians and leaders.

Even Ghandi, on occasions, was a c**t, and you can bet that there were plenty of people who regarded Jesus as a c**t, otherwise they'd never have nailed the fictional character to the hypothetical cross.

In fact the only people, known certainly not to be a c**t, are those who die before they master the art of being a c**t (language and controlled behaviour) i.e. still born babies, and those who lack the capacity of c**tyness (such as from Downs Syndrome) etc.

Guarantee 101 - By the time you hit 16, someone, somewhere has rightly adjudged you a c**t.

In truth, we all lie somewhere on the c**t spectrum, its just a question of what kind of c**t we are, and how much of a c**t we are in comparison to the National C**ting Average (100 points being the average kind of c**t).

Both Boris Johnson and Dianne Abbot are outliers in the c**t spectrum, by significant standard deviation above the anova determined compensatory factors.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

This is where one, unelected, Corbyn acolytes lives:

[Link]

It's a world away from those they claim to support and further evidence of how detached they are from the reality ordinary people experience on a daily basis.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Against Grammar Schools - but not of course, for her son. £18,000 a year Dulwich College if you please

Her Neighbours are apparently poor and use food banks

[Link]

Well Dulwich College isn't a grammar school, but I take the point.

Those on the Left are always faced with the dilemma. Do you do what is right for society - and grammar schools are definitively wrong for society - or do you do what is right for your own flesh and blood? It's a decision that many struggle with.

It's a struggle my own parents were faced with, and one I will be faced with as well (although I think I am less dogmatic about it).

The hypocrisy on the Right - demanding a smaller state, while happily accepting state education, state pensions, and state healthcare - is the same.

But the idea that the wealthy can't be interested in the improvement of the poor is ridiculous.

I should also say she doesn't have to be that wealthy to afford that house (although she is very successful so I would think she is wealthy). Had she bought a house for a relatively low sum a number of years ago, you don't need much to be able to step up. I have friends who bought properties in Hackney, Finsbury Park, etc. for a pittance a number of years ago which suddenly allows them to buy houses worth comfortably over a million just because of rises in house prices.

"It's almost like a moral decision. Except not really cos noone is going to find out," Jez, Peep Show

At home among the comments on there Matthew?

An Salesman? Never heard of her.

Rather than taking potshots, why don't you engage in the grammar school debate.

As an aside, whilst I rarely agreed with Shami Chakrabarti, I always had respect for her.

It does now feel like she has sold her soul for 13 pieces of silver

Do you mean grammar schools or private schools? Grammar schools are state selective schools. They are definitely not a tax on the wealthy. Quite the opposite as poor students make up significantly less % of pupils at grammar schools than they do at standard state schools. It ends up being an effective tax break for the wealthy as it means they don't need to send their children to private schools.

There are some on the Right who obviously have less affinity with the poor than others. And there are some whose policy stances are worse for the poor than others.

Where policies are obviously damaging to the poor then it isn't surprising that if imposed by an apparently rich individual the claim that they don't understand the plight of the ordinary man sticks.

Edited by OknotOK (11 Oct 2016 3.07pm)

"It's almost like a moral decision. Except not really cos noone is going to find out," Jez, Peep Show

Agree with what you're saying, the only caveat is that there is selection within schools at the moment, with the brightest kids being put in top sets and therefore working alongside each other.

The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.