Grooming Gangs + Tommy Robinson Thread
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 cryrst  The garden of England 28 Jul 19 4.36pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by DanH
Sad times when this board is populated by a bunch of TR and PJW fanboys. Not at all danh.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Wisbech Eagle  Truro Cornwall 28 Jul 19 4.38pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Penge Eagle
So your idea of finding out the truth is reading the mainstream media! I'll let you in on a little secret... the media often makes up stories to fit their narrative. Why don't you do some actual research instead of being a sheep? And you think you are intelligent?? Your last paragraph is totally irrelevant and more bluster. I will let you into something that's not secret. It's just ignored by those on the right with their own narrative. The MSM are by far not the worst culprits in stretching stories. They have editors in overall control, libel laws to be wary of and lawyers fact checking. They spin, but that's different. So if they describe a bunch of people as right wing, and those people don't deny it, or sue them, then I tend to think they might be right wing. Ducks and quacks come to my mind. The worst culprits for "fake news" are found in the uncontrolled social media where people pose as "journalists". An area of our lives now being exploited by malign forces determined to sow division. It's unfortunate that those with a victim syndrome fail to see this happening. My last paragraph is very far from bluster. It's the truth.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 28 Jul 19 4.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by cryrst
What would constitute intemperant language; if not wanting more immigration from some that bring nothing to the table. As the video cannot now be viewed I cannot even offer an opinion but there must have been more than that for the ban to be made. What you suggest seems perfectly acceptable. If you have a transcript please post it and we can try to analyse.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Penge Eagle Beckenham 28 Jul 19 5.14pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by DanH
Sad times when this board is populated by a bunch of TR and PJW fanboys. Yeah it's sad times when people don't conform to your ideology isn't it. Heaven forbid people have different opinions! So who should we be fans of instead? Edited by Penge Eagle (28 Jul 2019 5.19pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
| Penge Eagle Beckenham 28 Jul 19 5.16pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I will let you into something that's not secret. It's just ignored by those on the right with their own narrative. The MSM are by far not the worst culprits in stretching stories. They have editors in overall control, libel laws to be wary of and lawyers fact checking. They spin, but that's different. So if they describe a bunch of people as right wing, and those people don't deny it, or sue them, then I tend to think they might be right wing. Ducks and quacks come to my mind. The worst culprits for "fake news" are found in the uncontrolled social media where people pose as "journalists". An area of our lives now being exploited by malign forces determined to sow division. It's unfortunate that those with a victim syndrome fail to see this happening. My last paragraph is very far from bluster. It's the truth. Answer me these 2 questions... How is PJW 'far right' as you described? Why do you think the Daily Star removed the TR story I linked to?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
| DanH SW2 28 Jul 19 6.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Penge Eagle
Yeah it's sad times when people don't conform to your ideology isn't it. Heaven forbid people have different opinions! So who should we be fans of instead? Edited by Penge Eagle (28 Jul 2019 5.19pm) Preferably people who don’t peddle lies and hatred to a gullible base of fans to try and make some money.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 28 Jul 19 6.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by DanH
Preferably people who don’t peddle lies and hatred to a gullible base of fans to try and make some money. 'Gullible' Besides, what's Corbyn got to do with this?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 28 Jul 19 6.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I will let you into something that's not secret. It's just ignored by those on the right with their own narrative. The MSM are by far not the worst culprits in stretching stories. They have editors in overall control, libel laws to be wary of and lawyers fact checking. They spin, but that's different. So if they describe a bunch of people as right wing, and those people don't deny it, or sue them, then I tend to think they might be right wing. Ducks and quacks come to my mind. The worst culprits for "fake news" are found in the uncontrolled social media where people pose as "journalists". An area of our lives now being exploited by malign forces determined to sow division. It's unfortunate that those with a victim syndrome fail to see this happening. My last paragraph is very far from bluster. It's the truth. Mainly agree - also true of the extreme left. Or any extreme faction for that matter
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Penge Eagle Beckenham 28 Jul 19 6.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by DanH
Preferably people who don’t peddle lies and hatred to a gullible base of fans to try and make some money. Such a great wishy-washy, catch-all piece of virtue signalling with no specific examples, counter argument or even people who we should be fan boys of.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 28 Jul 19 6.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I will let you into something that's not secret. It's just ignored by those on the right with their own narrative. The MSM are by far not the worst culprits in stretching stories. They have editors in overall control, libel laws to be wary of and lawyers fact checking. They spin, but that's different. So if they describe a bunch of people as right wing, and those people don't deny it, or sue them, then I tend to think they might be right wing. Ducks and quacks come to my mind. The worst culprits for "fake news" are found in the uncontrolled social media where people pose as "journalists". An area of our lives now being exploited by malign forces determined to sow division. It's unfortunate that those with a victim syndrome fail to see this happening. My last paragraph is very far from bluster. It's the truth. No. That is fine to suggest where unsubstantiated claims are made but not so with hard facts and undeniable realities.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 28 Jul 19 6.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Penge Eagle
Answer me these 2 questions... How is PJW 'far right' as you described? Why do you think the Daily Star removed the TR story I linked to? This was the quote I found:- "Facebook is removing a host of prominent far-right and/or anti-Semitic political figures like Louis Farrakhan, Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos, Paul Joseph Watson, and Laura Loomer from both Facebook and Instagram, the company announced Thursday." That was from BuzzFeed whose article went on to say this "We've always banned individuals or organizations that promote or engage in violence and hate, regardless of ideology," a Facebook spokesperson told BuzzFeed News. "The process for evaluating potential violators is extensive and it is what led us to our decision to remove these accounts today." So sure BuzzFeed is well known for not being very sympathetic to right wing opinion but has kept tabs on these individuals much more than I have so if they call them far right I tend to believe them. However, that's really unimportant. What matters is that FB say they have broken their rules and, whatever their ideology might be, that gets them banned. I have no more detail than you as to why the newspaper removed it's story. I can only assume that they discovered it was not factual in some way. I don't though regard the Daily Star as a serious newspaper but much more a gossip and scandal rag, to which I pay no attention whatsoever.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 28 Jul 19 6.57pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
No. That is fine to suggest where unsubstantiated claims are made but not so with hard facts and undeniable realities. That is, of course, true but the problem is, I suspect, that most, if not all, of that which you and others regard as "hard facts and undeniable realities" are no such thing but are actually just opinions which match your prejudices. Twain's famous quote comes to mind:- “It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.”
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.