Khan hasn't insulted Trump though has he? He gave a pretty succinct description of him and explained why he thought that made it a mistake that he was invited for a State visit.

It's Trump who looks foolish in mixing it with a Mayor! He is, after all, supposed to be the President of the most powerful country in the world. He ought to be above such diversions but Trump cannot abide critics and never fails to lash out. He was taught that by Roy Cohn and has never learned how to moderate it. It is extremely inappropriate for a POTUS.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

You mean the people who were fed a diet of lies about an already poor candidate via social media interference by a foreign power, and a Murdoch owned TV station, and a train load of snake oil by a narcissistic TV "star?

Many of those people now see the error of their ways! Only around 41% of US voters would now vote for Trump again.

Of course it won't be a Trump supporter messaging support for Khan. It would be some of the other 59% of the voters.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

You said I wouldn’t know a nazi if one fell on me.

I said I do, and that only a cretin like Wayne doesn’t know what a nazi is.

How is that calling him a nazi? I said he doesn’t know what a nazi is.

Logic of a right winger I guess = none at all.

Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha.

The George Galloway Supporters Club?

The difference being?

[Tweet Link]

They were there, indeed:

[Link]

Committing murder.

Agreed there were some people there just protesting a statue being taken down, but it is a statue with a lot of meaning behind it.

Slavery, segregation and racism is a much more raw topic here than in the UK, let me tell you.

Edited by Maine Eagle (05 Jun 2019 3.02am)

Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha.

I don't buy into MSM narratives like you do. I have some issues with how that case was handled, however a woman lost her life and this guy must answer to that.

As for slavery, segregation and racism, the reason it's as 'raw' as it is....is because the Democrats have been fermenting identity politics within the black community for decades for votes.

Lets not forget the considerable racism within the Democrats itself, the anti white and anti male...and from some quarters anti semitic discourse that takes place.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Historically they are the slave owners.
Not one Republican had a slave.
The dems are still at it in their own areas of control politically.
No progression. Relying on the state. No aspiration.
No hope.
Yup the dems ARE still the party of slavery but because they promise so much financially it seems to work physocologically.

No but I heard Emily Thornberry on the same topic being cut to pieces.

Now we discover that Corbyn has to cheek to ask for a personal meeting with Trump and is surprised he doesn't get one.

Yesterday the organisers claimed 250,000 people would turn up to protest against Trump. They had to concede that only 50,000 showed others people put the crowd between 10 and 20,000.

A student digs somewhere in London:

"Today we get the chance to smash the far right and their leader in chief Trump. This is just the start of the revolution, err mind you that weather looking a bit iffy oh forget it I'm going back to bed and have a spliff."

Note to police: We should try cloud seeding as an effective form of crowd control.

One more point