You are here: Home > Message Board > Nostalgia Talk > Topic
November 13 2026 4.19pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

New manager discussion (LOCKED)


Page 189 of 251 < 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 >
bexleydave Flag Barnehurst 18 Jun 17 6.03pm

Originally posted by Brentmiester_General

Stop being a wally, then I'll engage you in intelligent conversation. Until then I'll call you out for being the wally that you are.

Oh dear, he's gone right back to the primary school playground now; an object to be more pitied than scolded.

 


Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Petereagle Flag Brockley 18 Jun 17 6.05pm

Originally posted by Brentmiester_General

Stop being a wally, then I'll engage you in intelligent conversation. Until then I'll call you out for being the wally that you are.

[Link]

What we really need is solid news. Keeping the faith is necessary, if very demanding. What I really want to say is: great choice, well done! For me, any of the rumoured candidates would be good, including the much maligned Dyche.

 

Petereagle Flag Brockley 18 Jun 17 6.06pm

Originally posted by Petereagle

[Link]

What we really need is solid news. Keeping the faith is necessary, if very demanding. What I really want to say is: great choice, well done! For me, any of the rumoured candidates would be good, including the much maligned Dyche.

[Link]

 

chateauferret Flag 18 Jun 17 6.24pm

Originally posted by bexleydave

"Smoke and mirrors" is an idiom for a deceptive, fraudulent or insubstantial explanation or description.

And still the man is so insubstantial that he can't post without the insults.

You are Willo and I calim my five free Wikipedia cribs.

 


============
The Ferret
============

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Jun 17 6.31pm

Originally posted by chateauferret

You are Willo and I calim my five free Wikipedia cribs.

Goodness me - NOT another one !

Let's NOT turn this into a 'Wikipedia' thread please.

 

Spiderman Flag Horsham 18 Jun 17 6.36pm

Originally posted by Willo

Goodness me - NOT another one !

Let's NOT turn this into a 'Wikipedia' thread please.

Here we go, couldn't help yourself could you. Why do you feel the need. No Willo threads today/

 

chateauferret Flag 18 Jun 17 6.38pm

Originally posted by Willo

Goodness me - NOT another one !

Let's NOT turn this into a 'Wikipedia' thread please.

I wasn't even talking to you.

 


============
The Ferret
============

.TUX. Flag 18 Jun 17 6.41pm

Originally posted by Petereagle

[Link]

What we really need is solid news. Keeping the faith is necessary, if very demanding. What I really want to say is: great choice, well done! For me, any of the rumoured candidates would be good, including the much maligned Dyche.

Well said.

 


Buy Litecoin.

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Jun 17 6.45pm

Originally posted by Spiderman

Here we go, couldn't help yourself could you. Why do you feel the need. No Willo threads today/

Just banter that's all !!!!

Some people on here probably think I am a "Stuffed shirt" (And worse !) but whilst I am not over-burdened with charisma I can be a cheerful chappie at times !.

Let's get back to the subject matter.

 

dp Flag Tunbridge Wells 18 Jun 17 6.46pm

Originally posted by bexleydave

"Smoke and mirrors" is an idiom for a deceptive, fraudulent or insubstantial explanation or description.

And still the man is so insubstantial that he can't post without the insults.

I am sure that the definition is correct, I haven't checked, however, there is a big difference between being fraudulent, deceptive or insubstantial.

Parish being fraudulent would imply that he is trying to make personal gain out of being dishonest. He is not.

Deceptive would imply that he is being dishonest. Which he is not.

Insubstantial would mean that he is not being dishonest, but is keeping some information private. Which is exactly what he is doing.

The operative word in the definition is "or" which means that the term applies to any one of the three definitions. This, it is quite feasible for Parish to be partaking in "smoke and mirrors" without being deceitful.

 

Palace in the Blood Flag 18 Jun 17 6.56pm

Originally posted by Willo

Just banter that's all !!!!

Some people on here probably think I am a "Stuffed shirt" (And worse !) but whilst I am not over-burdened with charisma I can be a cheerful chappie at times !.

Let's get back to the subject matter.

When?

 

Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 18 Jun 17 7.00pm

I think, but sometimes I'm not sure, that people have lives outside the HOL.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

BigNasty12 Flag Halifax 18 Jun 17 7.08pm

Originally posted by dp

I am sure that the definition is correct, I haven't checked, however, there is a big difference between being fraudulent, deceptive or insubstantial.

Parish being fraudulent would imply that he is trying to make personal gain out of being dishonest. He is not.

Deceptive would imply that he is being dishonest. Which he is not.

Insubstantial would mean that he is not being dishonest, but is keeping some information private. Which is exactly what he is doing.

The operative word in the definition is "or" which means that the term applies to any one of the three definitions. This, it is quite feasible for Parish to be partaking in "smoke and mirrors" without being deceitful.


How do you know ANY of this? Have you had business dealings with SP? SP could possibly be unscrupulous there's absolutely ZERO way you can make any of those assertions unless you've had business dealing with SP in the past.

 

Brentmiester_General Flag Front line in the battle against t... 18 Jun 17 7.11pm

Originally posted by BigNasty12


How do you know ANY of this? Have you had business dealings with SP? SP could possibly be unscrupulous there's absolutely ZERO way you can make any of those assertions unless you've had business dealing with SP in the past.

He is rather unscrupulous in business dealings.

 


"We love you Palace, we f@cking hate Man U, We love you Palace, we hate the brighton too, We love you Palace we play in red 'n' blue, so f@ck you, and you ...

Den1923 Flag 18 Jun 17 7.14pm

Originally posted by dp

Its not my job to give you hope Den. If you want to believe the spin and can't see that Zaha wouldn't have signed a new Contract without some indication of our ambition next year, then you are beyond any help that I could give you.

the exit clause in his contract would cover that if we were relegated, hopefully not but first we need a manager and then prepare!

 

Dan89 Flag Se25 18 Jun 17 7.31pm

Palace quiz. Who scored Palace first premier league goal back in the prem after promotion in 12/13 ?

Edited by Dan89 (18 Jun 2017 7.31pm)

 


Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

dp Flag Tunbridge Wells 18 Jun 17 7.33pm

Originally posted by BigNasty12

How do you know ANY of this? Have you had business dealings with SP? SP could possibly be unscrupulous there's absolutely ZERO way you can make any of those assertions unless you've had business dealing with SP in the past.

I think you might need to look a bit further back in the thread to see the context. I was explaining why I could say that SP was using smoke and mirrors without accusing him of being deceitful. I know this because I was referring to The English language.

That said, you should take care not to accuse people of being fraudulent and deceitful on social media.

 

dp Flag Tunbridge Wells 18 Jun 17 7.35pm

Originally posted by Den1923

the exit clause in his contract would cover that if we were relegated, hopefully not but first we need a manager and then prepare!

Yes, but why would he have bothered signing if of he thought we were going to get relegated?

 

Bexley Eagle Flag Bexley Kent 18 Jun 17 8.04pm

Originally posted by Dan89

Palace quiz. Who scored Palace first premier league goal back in the prem after promotion in 12/13 ?

Edited by Dan89 (18 Jun 2017 7.31pm)

I remember Moxey giving away the pen against Spurs in the first match that ended 1-0 but alas I am struggling after that. My son reckons we played Sunderland next and remembers Stuart OKeefe scoring, which I also recall but think that wasn't the first goal we scored

 

Dan89 Flag Se25 18 Jun 17 8.09pm

Originally posted by Bexley Eagle

I remember Moxey giving away the pen against Spurs in the first match that ended 1-0 but alas I am struggling after that. My son reckons we played Sunderland next and remembers Stuart OKeefe scoring, which I also recall but think that wasn't the first goal we scored

It was chamakh away to stoke. In a 2-1 defeat .

 


Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

Page 189 of 251 < 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > Nostalgia Talk > Topic