This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
Alright Dave? My name's Rodney, you plonker!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Matov
Seen some stats from French TV that show a poll claiming 91% of people who voted for Macron did so solely to stop Le Pen. Meaning the WEF candidate wins. Not because people agree with him but because they don't like the other option. That is no way to run a country. The headline here is woman branded as 'Far Right' wins over 40% of the vote. What will happen when the folly of mass immigration really starts to bite?
|
|
|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
Brexit: the ethnic vote carried the verdict for London (Remain ), even though a comfortable majority of ancestral brits wanted Brexit. "Ethnic" includes Polish, Hungarian & commonwealth like Australians. France : the ethnic vote carried Macron. Comfortable victory. Macron is a globalist open-borders deep-state autocrat. A good friend of Banking & Finance. Brutal with his riot police.
Edited by PalazioVecchio (25 Apr 2022 9.13am) The media are still referring to Macron as a policial outsider what a joke the guy couldn't be more establishment if he tried. I said this the first time he got elected on the promise of a radical shake-up of the French economy and union laws (none of which happened). "He is a sheep in wolf's clothing, a tool of the establishment."
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The headline here is woman branded as 'Far Right' wins over 40% of the vote. What will happen when the folly of mass immigration really starts to bite? No. The headline is 60% of the people weren't conned by the unfunded, watered-down promises of a far-right populist. If Palace lose to Leeds tonight, will it be because of "mass immigration"? You seem to connect everything else to this obsession of yours.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| W12 25 Apr 22 10.28am | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
No. The headline is 60% of the people weren't conned by the unfunded, watered-down promises of a far-right populist. If Palace lose to Leeds tonight, will it be because of "mass immigration"? You seem to connect everything else to this obsession of yours. What definition of far right are you using today?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
No. The headline is 60% of the people weren't conned by the unfunded, watered-down promises of a far-right populist. If Palace lose to Leeds tonight, will it be because of "mass immigration"? You seem to connect everything else to this obsession of yours. You can try to frame me however you like, but I don't need people to believe what I say. Of course, the globalist media and their useful idiots will be trying to brainwash the masses with their self-serving lies, but hopefully actual reality will shake people out of their comfortable delusions, and they will demand a stop to the madness. You are a man who wants to defy what people voted for in favour of globalist ambitions. You want to deny people democracy and have them ruled by faceless unelected corruptible puppets in another country. You want to blame Brexit for all our troubles. Do you also blame Biden for the USA's problems? What about Macron? Do you want to blame him too?
|
|
|
Originally posted by W12
What definition of far right are you using today? I don't define her. She does that. She is a con merchant. A wolf in sheep's clothing who has adopted populist tactics to improve her appeal to both left and centralist voters. Her history, her connections and her positions on things like Nato, Russia, immigrants and the EU put her firmly on the extreme right of European political thought. The Nazi's used socialistic promises to attract the masses to their philosophy. Le Pen is little different.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don't define her. She does that. She is a con merchant. A wolf in sheep's clothing who has adopted populist tactics to improve her appeal to both left and centralist voters. Her history, her connections and her positions on things like Nato, Russia, immigrants and the EU put her firmly on the extreme right of European political thought. The Nazi's used socialistic promises to attract the masses to their philosophy. Le Pen is little different. It's remarkable how you are so sensitive to one type of propaganda, but yet so blind to another.
|
|
|
Keep with mass immigration and how do you think they’ll mostly vote?
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Matov
Seen some stats from French TV that show a poll claiming 91% of people who voted for Macron did so solely to stop Le Pen. Meaning the WEF candidate wins. Not because people agree with him but because they don't like the other option. That is no way to run a country.
"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one" |
|
| W12 25 Apr 22 11.01am | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don't define her. She does that. She is a con merchant. A wolf in sheep's clothing who has adopted populist tactics to improve her appeal to both left and centralist voters. Her history, her connections and her positions on things like Nato, Russia, immigrants and the EU put her firmly on the extreme right of European political thought. The Nazi's used socialistic promises to attract the masses to their philosophy. Le Pen is little different. You defined her as far right but you do not have a definition of that. It would seem to be anyone who's political opinions you don't like.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Keep with mass immigration and how do you think they’ll mostly vote? You would think so, but it is remarkable how the problems of the existing majority soon become the problems of the immigrant when they realise that thousands more people arriving doesn't help them either.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
It's remarkable how you are so sensitive to one type of propaganda, but yet so blind to another. Nope! I recognise propaganda for what it is. I also recognise truth when I see it. I can tell the difference, unlike some who post here.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by W12
You defined her as far right but you do not have a definition of that. It would seem to be anyone who's political opinions you don't like. I don't have to define anyone. They do that. I just recognise it. I don't like the politics of Jeremy Corbyn or John McDonell. They are hardly far-right. I also don't like the politics of Boris Johnson. He isn't far-right either. He is just a populist prat.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Nope! I recognise propaganda for what it is. I also recognise truth when I see it. I can tell the difference, unlike some who post here. You need to go to Specsavers.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don't have to define anyone. They do that. I just recognise it. I don't like the politics of Jeremy Corbyn or John McDonell. They are hardly far-right. I also don't like the politics of Boris Johnson. He isn't far-right either. He is just a populist prat. Silly buzz word alert. Populist. A person, especially a politician, who strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups. So that is just about every politician.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You can try to frame me however you like, but I don't need people to believe what I say. Of course, the globalist media and their useful idiots will be trying to brainwash the masses with their self-serving lies, but hopefully actual reality will shake people out of their comfortable delusions, and they will demand a stop to the madness. You are a man who wants to defy what people voted for in favour of globalist ambitions. You want to deny people democracy and have them ruled by faceless unelected corruptible puppets in another country. You want to blame Brexit for all our troubles. Do you also blame Biden for the USA's problems? What about Macron? Do you want to blame him too? I have no need to even try to "frame" you. You manage to do that all by yourself with almost every post you write. If I spelled it out clearly myself, then I would be breaking the site rules, but there's no need. It's very obvious. I don't want to deny people anything. I just want our democracy to function the way it is intended to and not be hijacked by those in the Tory Party who put their own survival above the interests of the people. The "global media", is extremely diverse and contains many right leaning tycoons who spread their own world views to the people. Add to that the influence of social media and the way nonsense gets spread there, then your contention that there is some kind of conspiracy to deny people the truth is shown as baseless. I don't know how many times I need to explain that globalism isn't a matter of choice. It's a stage of human evolution. You can no more deny it, than fight gravity. We must work with, and within, it. I most certainly don't blame Brexit for all our problems, only that it has made things worse, not better. Macron has to deal with all the same problems, but together with the other members of the EU working in a unified strategy. He gets the blame, just as Biden gets the blame, for things that are beyond their control. That's politics and the skewed thinking of the uninformed voter who always wants to find someone to blame. I no more want us governed by anyone other than our Parliament than anyone else. The difference is that I believe that some things are better done with willing partners, so working together to achieve better results makes sense for all. Subsidiarity is the key principle.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You need to go to Specsavers. Went a few weeks ago. My prescription had changed a little, so I got some new glasses, but not from them. I had a perfectly serviceable frame reglazed via an online supplier. Thanks for the advice, though!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.