This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by bexleydave
I have at no time suggested that Parish is anything other than an honest and straightforward man who does not indulge in any sort of subterfuge. I picked someone else up for implying that he was and now I'm being lectured about it as if it's I who suggested it. If you, or anyone else, want to have a discussion about whether Parish indulges in underhand dealings then talk to the person who suggested he was. This is growing legs that were not intended. I think you picked me up for saying that he was indulging in smoke and mirrors, I was merely responding to explain how I could have said that he was indulging in smoke and mirrors without suggesting that he was dishonest. I was not lecturing you, I was explaining what I meant. Since I was the person who (apparently) suggested that he was dishonest originally, and I am happy that I know the context, I don't feel the need to explain myself further. Shall we put that one to bed now?
|
|
|
Originally posted by BigNasty12
I never accused anyone of anything. I said it's a possibility that SP is unscrupulous not that he was definitely unscrupulous. I don't know. I've NEVER had business dealings with. What I did was ask questions on how you where making your assertions. With that said I could've taken your comments out of context I wholeheartedly agree. I accept that. I also accept that nobody has accused Parish of being fraudulent, unscrupulous or deceitful. With that in mind, it seems that we all agree. We can put this to bed now.
|
|
|
Originally posted by chateauferret
To my mind "smoke and mirrors" does't necessarily imply subterfuge, it implies the use of illusion or of hiding something, but hiding things that are not public knowledge is perfectly good commercial practice; and after all, he that hath a secret to keep must keep it a secret that he hath a secret to keep. Thank you. A much better way of saying what I was trying to say.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Dan89
Because the whole thread laughable. Over 300 pages and realistically we no closer to knowing who gonna be the next manager? Then stop posting childish dribble, if you think it's laughable just bugger off to fun talk or something. Personally delighted with how were quietly going about our business. Mods-Any chance of a card for the next string of imbeciles who decide to go off topic for page after page? Edited by rawpalace05 (18 Jun 2017 10.27pm)
1/6/2010.a new era.we made it everyone!!!lets get the ball rolling for another 105 years of proud history.thank you cpfc2010. palace forever.eeaaaaaaaaaaaaaggglless!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Originally posted by GladAllOver27
Is de Boer palace next manager bookies favourite because Southampton preferred choice is pellergino But apparently pellergino would prefer palace to Southampton
|
|
|
Originally posted by rawpalace05
Then stop posting childish dribble, if you think it's laughable just bugger off to fun talk or something. Personally delighted with how were quietly going about our business. Mods-Any chance of a card for the next string of imbeciles who decide to go off topic for page after page? Edited by rawpalace05 (18 Jun 2017 10.27pm)[/quote I have just as much right as you to post on this thread.
Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football |
|
|
Originally posted by GladAllOver27
Is de Boer palace next manager bookies favourite because Southampton preferred choice is pellergino My hunch is tyat its FdB, but how nestly, who knows? Hopefully Parish does by now!
|
|
|
Damn! I'm getting fat on all the popcorn whilst reading from all the wet knicker posts.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
| Brinscall Eagle |
|
|---|---|
|
I think it will be Shrank De Pellodyche
|
|
|
Our new manager named - if not in place - by the end of this week will do me. COYP
|
|
|
Originally posted by Dan89
Originally posted by rawpalace05
Then stop posting childish dribble, if you think it's laughable just bugger off to fun talk or something. Personally delighted with how were quietly going about our business. Mods-Any chance of a card for the next string of imbeciles who decide to go off topic for page after page? Edited by rawpalace05 (18 Jun 2017 10.27pm)[/quote I have just as much right as you to post on this thread. No you don't, not if it's off topic...and even when you're talking on topic you're basically saying the same thing over and over. We get it, Parish should have got Jose Mourinho in the day after Sam left, he's a failure and cannot make a single decision that's right for the club, never has and never will. I'll start panicking if we hit July without a new manager, we rush and get a square peg in then yes, we'll need longer. We get the right fit in and 6 weeks will easily be ample. Some people are desperately impatient, it's embarrassing. "But look at Colchester United, they got a new manager in under a week, look at when one of the top 4 need a new boss, there's stuff reported every day in the paper. Why are we so s***?!" Stamps feet, repeat. Are you people that dense that you can't work out that this is real life?
1/6/2010.a new era.we made it everyone!!!lets get the ball rolling for another 105 years of proud history.thank you cpfc2010. palace forever.eeaaaaaaaaaaaaaggglless!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
more rumour.
|
|
|
Originally posted by HeathMan
Our new manager named - if not in place - by the end of this week will do me. COYP Agree. Minimum necessary, yours disgruntled Brckley
|
|
|
Originally posted by Dan89
Because the whole thread laughable. Over 300 pages and realistically we no closer to knowing who gonna be the next manager? A mere 77 pages if your settings are right
Cynic or realist? It's a fine line! |
|
|
Originally posted by rawpalace05
No you don't, not if it's off topic...and even when you're talking on topic you're basically saying the same thing over and over. We get it, Parish should have got Jose Mourinho in the day after Sam left, he's a failure and cannot make a single decision that's right for the club, never has and never will. I'll start panicking if we hit July without a new manager, we rush and get a square peg in then yes, we'll need longer. We get the right fit in and 6 weeks will easily be ample. Some people are desperately impatient, it's embarrassing. "But look at Colchester United, they got a new manager in under a week, look at when one of the top 4 need a new boss, there's stuff reported every day in the paper. Why are we so s***?!" Stamps feet, repeat. Are you people that dense that you can't work out that this is real life?
Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football |
|
|
Originally posted by rawpalace05
No you don't, not if it's off topic...and even when you're talking on topic you're basically saying the same thing over and over. We get it, Parish should have got Jose Mourinho in the day after Sam left, he's a failure and cannot make a single decision that's right for the club, never has and never will. I'll start panicking if we hit July without a new manager, we rush and get a square peg in then yes, we'll need longer. We get the right fit in and 6 weeks will easily be ample. Some people are desperately impatient, it's embarrassing. "But look at Colchester United, they got a new manager in under a week, look at when one of the top 4 need a new boss, there's stuff reported every day in the paper. Why are we so s***?!" Stamps feet, repeat. Are you people that dense that you can't work out that this is real life?
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
|
Originally posted by rawpalace05
I'll start panicking if we hit July without a new manager, we rush and get a square peg in then yes, we'll need longer. We get the right fit in and 6 weeks will easily be ample. Some people are desperately impatient, it's embarrassing. I've deleted the more stupid parts from your post leaving the only sensible part to comment on. There seems to be an idea amongst many that the longer SP takes over finding a new manager the more likely it is that he will land the right one but if one thinks about it logically that isn't necessarily the case and he is just as likely to end up with the wrong one as if he made his mind up quickly
|
|
|
Originally posted by bexleydave
Time is defo starting to run out and now Southampton are in competitiion for a couple of managers Palace itself has expressed interest in. Nobody knows this more than Parish. Now is the time to hire the best manager we can who is most in keeping with the Palace DNA, and I am sure he will do that.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.