You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
November 8 2026 5.24pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)


Page 197 of 261 < 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 >
Teddy Eagle Flag 18 Sep 23 12.26am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Not that I heard or that ever produced the kind of accusations now being made about Brand. Consensual sex with an underage girl is still a criminal act but one that is probably easier to defend if their age is borderline and they lied about it.

Perhaps they happened but didn’t reach widespread attention. I don’t discount that possibility anymore than they were just tittle tattle. Here we have very specific allegations from several sources.

Edited by Wisbech Eagle (17 Sep 2023 11.58pm)

Really? Never heard of Mandy Smith or Priscilla Presley? One was 13 and the other 14. No allegations. Recorded fact.

 

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 18 Sep 23 7.43am

Originally posted by georgenorman

What apart from Elvis and Bill Wyman having 'close relationships' with under-age girls?

Led Zepplin and David Bowie were others all a matter of public record and never refuted by the accused.

Actually with all the #MeToo it's a wonder that most pop stars of the sixties and seventies aren't in jail.

 


One more point

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 18 Sep 23 8.34am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Not that I heard or that ever produced the kind of accusations now being made about Brand. Consensual sex with an underage girl is still a criminal act but one that is probably easier to defend if their age is borderline and they lied about it.

Perhaps they happened but didn’t reach widespread attention. I don’t discount that possibility anymore than they were just tittle tattle. Here we have very specific allegations from several sources.

Edited by Wisbech Eagle (17 Sep 2023 11.58pm)

Mandy Smith has stated that she had sex with Wyman when she was 14.

 

The groover Flag Danbury 18 Sep 23 9.39am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Yep, and having been a Beatles nut it's common knowledge by anyone interested in their history that hookers and the many groupies were provided for them and their entourage during all their tours....Ringo wasn't only banging his drums....Girls of all ages threw themselves at them.

It was the done thing with all major acts of the day.

Until Lennon started to get political intelligence services didn't give a damn.

Edited by Stirlingsays (17 Sep 2023 11.26pm)

There's a massive difference between girls throwing themselves at celebs and what Brand has done.

I watched the TV show and there was a section where a recorded chat with Saville was played where Brand offers to send his young assistant to him. Very uncomfortable. He was forcing himself on young girls.

 

The groover Flag Danbury 18 Sep 23 9.53am

Originally posted by Spiderman


Of course he has been tried by TV
The alleged victim was in a relationship with Brand and admitted he had never done anything previously to worry her. She did not go to the police, why not? This was in the land of the law suit, the US.
Whether you like Brand or not, the evidence is suspect to say the least. Perhaps he just needs help and loving like Hunter

Edited by Spiderman (17 Sep 2023 7.47pm)

Alleged victim(s).

One of them, just 16 at the time, stated that he had forced himself down her throat causing her to almost pass out. When she asked why he had done that he said that he wanted to see her mascara run. He then goes on to use that in a "comedy" routine. Which came first is questionable. But making a statement that "He likes to do that" is fairly damning.

Saville got away with his actions for decades because the Police and CPS constantly said insufficient evidence. It was only when TV did a report after his death that it finally came out.

Brand's actions and comments have always been questionable and even sick.

In my opinion his actions will result in a prosecution.

 

Forest Hillbilly Flag in a hidey-hole 18 Sep 23 9.56am

Perverts and crooks are in every walk of life, I would think. What is gripping my bits at the moment, is that all investigations seem to be conducted by the media (BBC and C4) , all in the public eye, very much by the organisations that facilitated allegations and similar activities.

IF any illegal stuff happened, that is for the CPS and police to decide.

 


I disengage, I turn the page.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 18 Sep 23 10.18am

Originally posted by The groover

There's a massive difference between girls throwing themselves at celebs and what Brand has done.

I watched the TV show and there was a section where a recorded chat with Saville was played where Brand offers to send his young assistant to him. Very uncomfortable. He was forcing himself on young girls.

Says who?

You are indulging in speculation based on hearsay and the testimony of people with whom he had consensual relationships.

This is a kangaroo court created by the media which has decided to make a big story out of it rather than taking it to the police.

Why? Is their agenda for the people behind this beyond trying to make a name for themselves?

Remember Martin Bashir?

 

The groover Flag Danbury 18 Sep 23 11.30am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Says who?

You are indulging in speculation based on hearsay and the testimony of people with whom he had consensual relationships.

This is a kangaroo court created by the media which has decided to make a big story out of it rather than taking it to the police.

Why? Is their agenda for the people behind this beyond trying to make a name for themselves?

Remember Martin Bashir?

One question.

Did you watch the TV program?

There were apologises from him on text and voice messaging for his behaviour to the ladies concerned.

Did you read my previous post where he offered his young assistant to Jimmy Saville? And said she will do anything I say or lose her job!!

The man is scum.

As I said previously. Going to the Police does not always result in the correct action being taken.

Jimmy Saville for one. Decades of abuse.

And they were not all consensual. He attacked his assistant. That was one of the cases where he apologised.

 

Forest Hillbilly Flag in a hidey-hole 18 Sep 23 12.18pm

Because the media are really good at conducting investigations.

Colin Stagg ?

Christopher Jefferies ?

And no investigations at all into their own employees.

This should be left to the police and CPS, otherwise it's just another PR hatchet-job.

 


I disengage, I turn the page.

puncheon_judy Flag 18 Sep 23 12.48pm

They should be encouraging employees to come forward and talk about their experiences in private, rather than allowing for this trial by media.

There are countless, and I mean countless, stories of this kind of behaviour from so many current TV personalities but no one ever wants to speak up because the support culture isn't there.

 

Stirlingsays Flag 18 Sep 23 4.38pm

Originally posted by The groover

There's a massive difference between girls throwing themselves at celebs and what Brand has done.

I watched the TV show and there was a section where a recorded chat with Saville was played where Brand offers to send his young assistant to him. Very uncomfortable. He was forcing himself on young girls.

I disagree with the idea that there's a difference.

I'm skeptical of the claim that Brand forced women to have sex. I'm willing to be convinced but personally I've stated what I think is happening here and I'm of the view that there's nothing there other than some women resent the guy for whatever reason.

It's been highlighted how the establishment is extremely choosey about who it goes after and when.....Some people pick up on that and some don't or choose to ignore it.

Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Sep 2023 4.40pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Stirlingsays Flag 18 Sep 23 4.45pm

Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly

Because the media are really good at conducting investigations.

Colin Stagg ?

Christopher Jefferies ?

And no investigations at all into their own employees.

This should be left to the police and CPS, otherwise it's just another PR hatchet-job.


Yep, they get away with it because there's no accountability ...It's hard because I don't support censorship but I'm very willing to point at the hypocrisy and ultra low standards....No, once it's shown that they were wrong the tune changes and they just pretend like they never played a part in it.....Most people are just too disconnected to bother or care.

However, anyone with a memory better than a goldfish remembers how the press were:

Can't remember that politician who was accused of raping that fruitcake, who was lying all along....died not long after. (though I'm aware that this stuff does happen...but we don't hear about it)
Cliff Richard
Kevin Spacey
Johnny Depp
Countless others.

Gutter press is an understatement.....and it's even the broadsheets in today's environment.


Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Sep 2023 4.48pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Forest Hillbilly Flag in a hidey-hole 18 Sep 23 5.09pm

Keeping this about the BBC, what has re-surfaced in recent 'outings' is the number of times (routinely) BBC cars and chauffeurs were used to ferry around 'friends'/'victims' of celebrity's to keep them away from the press.

More licence-fee payers money just spunked up the wall. And now there'll likely be legal fees and severance pay.

My friend had a warning letter from the TV licence people last week. He's on not much above minimum wage. Different worlds

 


I disengage, I turn the page.

eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 18 Sep 23 5.52pm

Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly

Keeping this about the BBC, what has re-surfaced in recent 'outings' is the number of times (routinely) BBC cars and chauffeurs were used to ferry around 'friends'/'victims' of celebrity's to keep them away from the press.

More licence-fee payers money just spunked up the wall. And now there'll likely be legal fees and severance pay.

My friend had a warning letter from the TV licence people last week. He's on not much above minimum wage. Different worlds

If he's responded to it, they will be all over him like a rash. If, he does like i do, ignore & throw away. Sometime ago when i came back to the UK, there were 14 such letters, all got binned. I stream stuff now, thanks to the grandkids to show me how.

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Stirlingsays Flag 18 Sep 23 6.28pm

Originally posted by eagleman13

If he's responded to it, they will be all over him like a rash. If, he does like i do, ignore & throw away. Sometime ago when i came back to the UK, there were 14 such letters, all got binned. I stream stuff now, thanks to the grandkids to show me how.

Good chap.

The BBC are trash and don't deserve any conservative's money.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 18 Sep 23 10.08pm

Originally posted by The groover

One question.

Did you watch the TV program?

There were apologises from him on text and voice messaging for his behaviour to the ladies concerned.

Did you read my previous post where he offered his young assistant to Jimmy Saville? And said she will do anything I say or lose her job!!

The man is scum.

As I said previously. Going to the Police does not always result in the correct action being taken.

Jimmy Saville for one. Decades of abuse.

And they were not all consensual. He attacked his assistant. That was one of the cases where he apologised.

So she claims.

I have yet to see something that convinces me of anything other than the fact that Brand used his position to shag as many women as possible and was proud of it. He has never been afraid to express what some would call sexist attitudes, and perhaps did things that in retrospect were unwise given his celebrity status and potential vulnerability to exactly these sorts of accusations.

When the CPS decides that he can be prosecuted for something specific, and he is found guilty in a fair trial, we can call him a criminal.
Until then, he is innocent in the eyes of the law.

How this affects his career going forward is another story.

 

Stirlingsays Flag 18 Sep 23 10.16pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

So she claims.

I have yet to see something that convinces me of anything other than the fact that Brand used his position to shag as many women as possible and was proud of it. He has never been afraid to express what some would call sexist attitudes, and perhaps did things that in retrospect were unwise given his celebrity status and potential vulnerability to exactly these sorts of accusations.

When the CPS decides that he can be prosecuted for something specific, and he is found guilty in a fair trial, we can call him a criminal.
Until then, he is innocent in the eyes of the law.

How this affects his career going forward is another story.

Pretty much how I see it.

Everyone and his dog knew what Brand was like and he said so himself. If he's an actual rapist then let them prove it.

However, I'm pretty skeptical.....and as we saw, our court system managed to find for Amber Heard....So If they find he is I'll be interested upon what grounds they found it was proven.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 18 Sep 23 10.28pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

So she claims.

I have yet to see something that convinces me of anything other than the fact that Brand used his position to shag as many women as possible and was proud of it. He has never been afraid to express what some would call sexist attitudes, and perhaps did things that in retrospect were unwise given his celebrity status and potential vulnerability to exactly these sorts of accusations.

When the CPS decides that he can be prosecuted for something specific, and he is found guilty in a fair trial, we can call him a criminal.
Until then, he is innocent in the eyes of the law.

How this affects his career going forward is another story.

Why would he apologise if the claims were untrue?

I have yet to hear anything that convinces me that the claims are untrue. That he was proud of his behaviour is besides the point. The point is whether it was always consensual. Not sometimes or even most times but always.

Whether enough evidence can be presented to clear the relatively high bar needed for a criminal conviction, especially given the time elapsed, is yet to be determined. The CPS could easily refuse to allow a prosecution.

That though doesn’t mean Brand would succeed with a deformation suit.

Which would leave us all to reach our own conclusions. Which will be as divided as they always are here.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards SW19 CPFC Flag Addiscombe West 18 Sep 23 10.34pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Pretty much how I see it.

Everyone and his dog knew what Brand was like and he said so himself. If he's an actual rapist then let them prove it.

However, I'm pretty skeptical.....and as we saw, our court system managed to find for Amber Heard....So If they find he is I'll be interested upon what grounds they found it was proven.

And if he’s completely innocent as you’re both inferring as it fits your narratives, I await his aggressive legal response, which, against unfounded and made up allegations will wipe the floor with all of the accusers, journalists and corporations. He’ll make a pretty penny.

On balance it seems pretty likely that he’s overstepped the mark a few times out of the 500 plus encounters he’s no doubt had. Don’t think I’ve ever heard of a respectful sex addict.

Does make me laugh that the right embrace him so warmly now he’s no longer the lefts darling, and now they’ll do anything to protect him.

The big shame is that when balanced he had/has had some very on the nail summations of the issue with power and corruption. Amongst other things.

But that doesn’t make you immortal

 


Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards SW19 CPFC Flag Addiscombe West 18 Sep 23 10.38pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Why would he apologise if the claims were untrue?

I have yet to hear anything that convinces me that the claims are untrue. That he was proud of his behaviour is besides the point. The point is whether it was always consensual. Not sometimes or even most times but always.

Whether enough evidence can be presented to clear the relatively high bar needed for a criminal conviction, especially given the time elapsed, is yet to be determined. The CPS could easily refuse to allow a prosecution.

That though doesn’t mean Brand would succeed with a deformation suit.

Which would leave us all to reach our own conclusions. Which will be as divided as they always are here.

I think if this is all made up and one big ruse, he will clean up.

The usuals on here just don’t want to believe that his outing has nothing to do with his (admittedly sometimes laudable) anti-establishment stance because it doesn’t allow the conditions to bolster their political and ideological beliefs.

He’s always been an oddball. It’s not that big a stretch.

 


Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

Page 197 of 261 < 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)