This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Not that I heard or that ever produced the kind of accusations now being made about Brand. Consensual sex with an underage girl is still a criminal act but one that is probably easier to defend if their age is borderline and they lied about it. Perhaps they happened but didn’t reach widespread attention. I don’t discount that possibility anymore than they were just tittle tattle. Here we have very specific allegations from several sources. Edited by Wisbech Eagle (17 Sep 2023 11.58pm) Really? Never heard of Mandy Smith or Priscilla Presley? One was 13 and the other 14. No allegations. Recorded fact.
|
|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
What apart from Elvis and Bill Wyman having 'close relationships' with under-age girls? Led Zepplin and David Bowie were others all a matter of public record and never refuted by the accused. Actually with all the #MeToo it's a wonder that most pop stars of the sixties and seventies aren't in jail.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Not that I heard or that ever produced the kind of accusations now being made about Brand. Consensual sex with an underage girl is still a criminal act but one that is probably easier to defend if their age is borderline and they lied about it. Perhaps they happened but didn’t reach widespread attention. I don’t discount that possibility anymore than they were just tittle tattle. Here we have very specific allegations from several sources. Edited by Wisbech Eagle (17 Sep 2023 11.58pm) Mandy Smith has stated that she had sex with Wyman when she was 14.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Yep, and having been a Beatles nut it's common knowledge by anyone interested in their history that hookers and the many groupies were provided for them and their entourage during all their tours....Ringo wasn't only banging his drums....Girls of all ages threw themselves at them. It was the done thing with all major acts of the day. Until Lennon started to get political intelligence services didn't give a damn. Edited by Stirlingsays (17 Sep 2023 11.26pm) There's a massive difference between girls throwing themselves at celebs and what Brand has done. I watched the TV show and there was a section where a recorded chat with Saville was played where Brand offers to send his young assistant to him. Very uncomfortable. He was forcing himself on young girls.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Edited by Spiderman (17 Sep 2023 7.47pm) Alleged victim(s). One of them, just 16 at the time, stated that he had forced himself down her throat causing her to almost pass out. When she asked why he had done that he said that he wanted to see her mascara run. He then goes on to use that in a "comedy" routine. Which came first is questionable. But making a statement that "He likes to do that" is fairly damning. Saville got away with his actions for decades because the Police and CPS constantly said insufficient evidence. It was only when TV did a report after his death that it finally came out. Brand's actions and comments have always been questionable and even sick. In my opinion his actions will result in a prosecution.
|
|
|
Originally posted by The groover
There's a massive difference between girls throwing themselves at celebs and what Brand has done. I watched the TV show and there was a section where a recorded chat with Saville was played where Brand offers to send his young assistant to him. Very uncomfortable. He was forcing himself on young girls. Says who? You are indulging in speculation based on hearsay and the testimony of people with whom he had consensual relationships. This is a kangaroo court created by the media which has decided to make a big story out of it rather than taking it to the police. Why? Is their agenda for the people behind this beyond trying to make a name for themselves? Remember Martin Bashir?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Says who? You are indulging in speculation based on hearsay and the testimony of people with whom he had consensual relationships. This is a kangaroo court created by the media which has decided to make a big story out of it rather than taking it to the police. Why? Is their agenda for the people behind this beyond trying to make a name for themselves? Remember Martin Bashir? One question. Did you watch the TV program? There were apologises from him on text and voice messaging for his behaviour to the ladies concerned. Did you read my previous post where he offered his young assistant to Jimmy Saville? And said she will do anything I say or lose her job!! The man is scum. As I said previously. Going to the Police does not always result in the correct action being taken. Jimmy Saville for one. Decades of abuse. And they were not all consensual. He attacked his assistant. That was one of the cases where he apologised.
|
|
|
Originally posted by The groover
There's a massive difference between girls throwing themselves at celebs and what Brand has done. I watched the TV show and there was a section where a recorded chat with Saville was played where Brand offers to send his young assistant to him. Very uncomfortable. He was forcing himself on young girls. I disagree with the idea that there's a difference. I'm skeptical of the claim that Brand forced women to have sex. I'm willing to be convinced but personally I've stated what I think is happening here and I'm of the view that there's nothing there other than some women resent the guy for whatever reason. It's been highlighted how the establishment is extremely choosey about who it goes after and when.....Some people pick up on that and some don't or choose to ignore it. Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Sep 2023 4.40pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
Because the media are really good at conducting investigations. Colin Stagg ? Christopher Jefferies ? And no investigations at all into their own employees. This should be left to the police and CPS, otherwise it's just another PR hatchet-job.
However, anyone with a memory better than a goldfish remembers how the press were: Can't remember that politician who was accused of raping that fruitcake, who was lying all along....died not long after. (though I'm aware that this stuff does happen...but we don't hear about it) Gutter press is an understatement.....and it's even the broadsheets in today's environment.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
Keeping this about the BBC, what has re-surfaced in recent 'outings' is the number of times (routinely) BBC cars and chauffeurs were used to ferry around 'friends'/'victims' of celebrity's to keep them away from the press. More licence-fee payers money just spunked up the wall. And now there'll likely be legal fees and severance pay. My friend had a warning letter from the TV licence people last week. He's on not much above minimum wage. Different worlds If he's responded to it, they will be all over him like a rash. If, he does like i do, ignore & throw away. Sometime ago when i came back to the UK, there were 14 such letters, all got binned. I stream stuff now, thanks to the grandkids to show me how.
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
|
Originally posted by eagleman13
If he's responded to it, they will be all over him like a rash. If, he does like i do, ignore & throw away. Sometime ago when i came back to the UK, there were 14 such letters, all got binned. I stream stuff now, thanks to the grandkids to show me how. Good chap. The BBC are trash and don't deserve any conservative's money.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by The groover
One question. Did you watch the TV program? There were apologises from him on text and voice messaging for his behaviour to the ladies concerned. Did you read my previous post where he offered his young assistant to Jimmy Saville? And said she will do anything I say or lose her job!! The man is scum. As I said previously. Going to the Police does not always result in the correct action being taken. Jimmy Saville for one. Decades of abuse. And they were not all consensual. He attacked his assistant. That was one of the cases where he apologised. So she claims. I have yet to see something that convinces me of anything other than the fact that Brand used his position to shag as many women as possible and was proud of it. He has never been afraid to express what some would call sexist attitudes, and perhaps did things that in retrospect were unwise given his celebrity status and potential vulnerability to exactly these sorts of accusations. When the CPS decides that he can be prosecuted for something specific, and he is found guilty in a fair trial, we can call him a criminal. How this affects his career going forward is another story.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
So she claims. I have yet to see something that convinces me of anything other than the fact that Brand used his position to shag as many women as possible and was proud of it. He has never been afraid to express what some would call sexist attitudes, and perhaps did things that in retrospect were unwise given his celebrity status and potential vulnerability to exactly these sorts of accusations. When the CPS decides that he can be prosecuted for something specific, and he is found guilty in a fair trial, we can call him a criminal. How this affects his career going forward is another story. Pretty much how I see it. Everyone and his dog knew what Brand was like and he said so himself. If he's an actual rapist then let them prove it. However, I'm pretty skeptical.....and as we saw, our court system managed to find for Amber Heard....So If they find he is I'll be interested upon what grounds they found it was proven.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
So she claims. I have yet to see something that convinces me of anything other than the fact that Brand used his position to shag as many women as possible and was proud of it. He has never been afraid to express what some would call sexist attitudes, and perhaps did things that in retrospect were unwise given his celebrity status and potential vulnerability to exactly these sorts of accusations. When the CPS decides that he can be prosecuted for something specific, and he is found guilty in a fair trial, we can call him a criminal. How this affects his career going forward is another story. Why would he apologise if the claims were untrue? I have yet to hear anything that convinces me that the claims are untrue. That he was proud of his behaviour is besides the point. The point is whether it was always consensual. Not sometimes or even most times but always. Whether enough evidence can be presented to clear the relatively high bar needed for a criminal conviction, especially given the time elapsed, is yet to be determined. The CPS could easily refuse to allow a prosecution. That though doesn’t mean Brand would succeed with a deformation suit. Which would leave us all to reach our own conclusions. Which will be as divided as they always are here.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Pretty much how I see it. Everyone and his dog knew what Brand was like and he said so himself. If he's an actual rapist then let them prove it. However, I'm pretty skeptical.....and as we saw, our court system managed to find for Amber Heard....So If they find he is I'll be interested upon what grounds they found it was proven. And if he’s completely innocent as you’re both inferring as it fits your narratives, I await his aggressive legal response, which, against unfounded and made up allegations will wipe the floor with all of the accusers, journalists and corporations. He’ll make a pretty penny. On balance it seems pretty likely that he’s overstepped the mark a few times out of the 500 plus encounters he’s no doubt had. Don’t think I’ve ever heard of a respectful sex addict. Does make me laugh that the right embrace him so warmly now he’s no longer the lefts darling, and now they’ll do anything to protect him. The big shame is that when balanced he had/has had some very on the nail summations of the issue with power and corruption. Amongst other things. But that doesn’t make you immortal
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Why would he apologise if the claims were untrue? I have yet to hear anything that convinces me that the claims are untrue. That he was proud of his behaviour is besides the point. The point is whether it was always consensual. Not sometimes or even most times but always. Whether enough evidence can be presented to clear the relatively high bar needed for a criminal conviction, especially given the time elapsed, is yet to be determined. The CPS could easily refuse to allow a prosecution. That though doesn’t mean Brand would succeed with a deformation suit. Which would leave us all to reach our own conclusions. Which will be as divided as they always are here. I think if this is all made up and one big ruse, he will clean up. The usuals on here just don’t want to believe that his outing has nothing to do with his (admittedly sometimes laudable) anti-establishment stance because it doesn’t allow the conditions to bolster their political and ideological beliefs. He’s always been an oddball. It’s not that big a stretch.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.