This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Bright v Benteke
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 monkey  Sittingbourne,but made in Bromley 16 Feb 18 5.13am |
  |
|---|---|
|
For sheer guts, determination and a willingness to sweat blood for your team and bring others into the game, it’s a no brainer and an embarrassing comparison!! Mark Bright would put his head where Benteke wouldn’t even put a foot in.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Casual Orpington 16 Feb 18 6.22am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ZIGnZAG
Your still completely oblivious to a certain massive difference, which your stupid to overlook. One is played as a lone striker. One was part of a partnership. SAS Sutton and shearer. York and Cole. Bright and Wright. Benteke and...... That's the difference. Your comparing one man doing the whole job, alone. To another man who did 50% of the job, while someone else did the other 50%. So maybe.... just to be fair.... ask yourself.... Does benteke do 50% of a job? So Benteke must get twice as many chances , as they would all fall to him ?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Casual Orpington 16 Feb 18 6.24am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Casual
So Benteke must get twice as many chances , as they would all fall to him ? I think he would be on more than 1 goal, even at his current age, wearing a suit , with Parish playing as a number 10.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| OldFella London 16 Feb 18 7.58am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Casual
I think he would be on more than 1 goal, even at his current age, wearing a suit , with Parish playing as a number 10. Parish playing in the hole behind Bright?
Jackson.. Wan Bissaka.... Sansom.. Nicholas.. Cannon.. Guehi.... Zaha... Thomas.. Byrne... Holton.. Rogers.. that should do it.. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Casual Orpington 16 Feb 18 9.48am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by OldFella
Parish playing in the hole behind Bright? [/quote Ha. I’d have assumed it would be the other way around
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Tom-the-eagle Croydon 16 Feb 18 9.58am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Casual
Originally posted by OldFella
Parish playing in the hole behind Bright? [/quote Ha. I’d have assumed it would be the other way around Ha ha - your on form today mate Edited by Tom-the-eagle (16 Feb 2018 9.59am)
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Andy_G Wimbledon 16 Feb 18 10.01am |
|
|---|---|
|
That' not a serious question right? Benteke or Langley who is better?
The ups and downs of Palace have left me older than my years |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Fatherken 16 Feb 18 10.09am |
|
|---|---|
|
In my view Bright was a better all round player than Wright , never stopped running and looking to get other player into the game . Unfortunately Big Ben does not do this so it's Bright for me .
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Frickin Saweet  South Cronx 16 Feb 18 10.27am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ZIGnZAG
Your still completely oblivious to a certain massive difference, which your stupid to overlook. One is played as a lone striker. One was part of a partnership. SAS Sutton and shearer. York and Cole. Bright and Wright. Benteke and...... That's the difference. Your comparing one man doing the whole job, alone. To another man who did 50% of the job, while someone else did the other 50%. So maybe.... just to be fair.... ask yourself.... Does benteke do 50% of a job? That doesn't make any sense. Formations aside, Bright did 100% of the job he was tasked with and did it well. Benteke is probably doing more like 60% of the job he is being tasked with and that's generous. Both players played in a team of 11 so neither did it all on their own.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ZIGnZAG Stoke 16 Feb 18 10.43am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by OldFella
Think you're on a sticky wicket calling someone stupid.... My bad, soz sir. Edited by ZIGnZAG (16 Feb 2018 10.49am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ZIGnZAG Stoke 16 Feb 18 10.49am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Frickin Saweet
That doesn't make any sense. Formations aside, Bright did 100% of the job he was tasked with and did it well. Benteke is probably doing more like 60% of the job he is being tasked with and that's generous. Both players played in a team of 11 so neither did it all on their own. Formations aside. Sorry what. Bright may not have had the effect he did if he was played as a lone striker. Try playing Benteke in a partnership, like Bright did. Then it would be fair to compare the two.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| MonsterMunch Cambridge 16 Feb 18 10.59am |
|
|---|---|
|
The answer should overwhelmingly be Benteke. On top form Benteke would probably blow Brighty away. Thing is we are just not seeing it anymore and certainly can’t rely on him anymore. Benteke should be the top,top striker we thought we and Liverpool paid all that money for. The two goals he has scored have dont nothing to get him out of this rut he’s in. I’d stick Brighty in the 11 now let alone back in his playing days. Edited by MonsterMunch (16 Feb 2018 11.00am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.