This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Sportyteacher
You're right as I'm sure every American family and certainly chat show host would testify. If you look carefully enough, the NRA-loving Trump can be seen with 'blood on his hands'.... Chat show hosts, the vast majority. American families, not so sure.
Optimistic as ever |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stuk
Chat show hosts, the vast majority. American families, not so sure. Good point. I heard a Democrat politician on the radio the other day defending the right to bear arms on the grounds that it’s the USA’s democratic decision, even though he personally disagreed with it, and was full of sorrow for the victims. It was interesting.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Sir James Hird ![]() |
|
---|---|
ON many levels, 'the right to bear arms' is wrong,wrong,wrong. Its a throwback to Billy the Kid, Jesse James etc.. All loonies, glorified like our own Ned Kelly.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Sir James Hird
ON many levels, 'the right to bear arms' is wrong,wrong,wrong. Its a throwback to Billy the Kid, Jesse James etc.. All loonies, glorified like our own Ned Kelly. Oh the 'feels' instead of the 'reals'. The US isn't going to give up the rights to civilian gun ownership and the reasons are multi varied. If you could just magically transport them into a situation like the UK where most of the guns were only with official agencies and strictly regulated owners then I think many in the US would take that option. However, the practical steps required to get to that position in reality would split the country and come with much blood letting. My view is that America chooses its own path but I have sympathy for your feelings. It's a sh1t sandwich. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 May 2018 11.12pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Sir James Hird
ON many levels, 'the right to bear arms' is wrong,wrong,wrong. Its a throwback to Billy the Kid, Jesse James etc.. All loonies, glorified like our own Ned Kelly. To your point, the front page of Sunday's New York Daily News.
Divorced...And LOVING it! |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Oh the 'feels' instead of the 'reals'. The US isn't going to give up the rights to civilian gun ownership and the reasons are multi varied. If you could just magically transport them into a situation like the UK where most of the guns were only with official agencies and strictly regulated owners then I think many in the US would take that option. However, the practical steps required to get to that position in reality would split the country and come with much blood letting. My view is that America chooses its own path but I have sympathy for your feelings. It's a sh1t sandwich. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 May 2018 11.12pm) I doubt it. A huge swathe of Americans believe rightly or wrongly that there is too much government and want the reassurance of being able to arm themselves...
Pro USA & Israel |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
The Second Amendment is there for US citizens to defend themselves against a tyrannical government. The banning of guns will never happen (at least in our lifetimes) because the majority of the country don't want a ban.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
'Armed bystanders gun down Oklahoma City restaurant shooter' [Link] Good guy with a gun saves lives by killing bad guy with gun.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
I doubt it. A huge swathe of Americans believe rightly or wrongly that there is too much government and want the reassurance of being able to arm themselves... Well, I said many. Let's not forget that 200 years ago it was an argument that could be made, but today hunting rifles don't tend to be very effective against artillery, tanks or aerial bombardment.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
'Armed bystanders gun down Oklahoma City restaurant shooter' [Link] Good guy with a gun saves lives by killing bad guy with gun. Glad you brought this up, 'good' gun stories – good men and women preserving life with guns – rarely gets a mention these days.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Sir James Hird ![]() |
|
---|---|
Sadly Indianapolis incident. Teacher puts himself in harms way for his students and takes a bullet.Another student injured. This teacher did NOT have a gun.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.