I've not read the details but one baby death should have prompted an investigation at her place of work, two babies then alarm bells should have been ringing, after three babies she definitely shouldn't have been at work. Didn’t she have any managers?

As with most nhs departments, probably too many!
All form filling and not taking responsibility for their fat pay and pensions.

There are a lot of people rushing to judgement here but until the facts are known I think that's unwise.

There are some unusual aspects which seem to me to urge caution. She has been interviewed several times and released without charge, even though there are a large number of incidents involved. That's odd.

Nurses don't work unsupervised so if anything untoward was happening, you would expect it to have been picked up.

Her being refused bail would have been as much for her own protection as anything else, as she no longer works as a nuclear rse.

So my gut feeling is that there is more here than what appears at face value.

Before anyone jumps down my throat I am not making any excuses for anything. I am simply suggesting that we don't yet have the full picture.

Everything else nowadays is trial by media.
Greg dyke just last week.
Why not her?