This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
TalkRadio
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
BlueJay  UK 05 Jan 21 7.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Now reinstated.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
 Stirlingsays  05 Jan 21 8.14pm |
   |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Now reinstated. At least they have something new to talk about.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
croydon proud  Any european country i fancy! 05 Jan 21 8.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Would you say the same if Gove was not a CON? Think very carefully before responding Probably wouldn"t annoy me as much spider, he would just be a liar, not a CON liar, most politicians just toe the party line and the annoying bit is them thinking we believe them.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| croydon proud Any european country i fancy! 05 Jan 21 8.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The suggestion apparently is that they have allowed some contributors to spread disinformation which at this time is dangerous. Free speech has to be matched by responsibility. It cannot be absolute. Absolutely!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 05 Jan 21 9.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
That's no different to what the Soviets said. If they did, which is something I have never heard, it just goes to prove they didn't get everything wrong. Even broken clocks are right twice a day!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 05 Jan 21 9.57pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Responsibility has to be matched with honesty, but Gove would not answer the questions. Free speech must allow anybody to ask questions. If the answers are not given, and the question rephrased without answer again, that is no reason to shut down the question. There is no suggestion that the reason the action was taken was because of an interview with Gove, or anyone else. YT are unlikely to heed any protests by a UK minister. They take their own decisions.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 05 Jan 21 10.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
There is no suggestion that the reason the action was taken was because of an interview with Gove, or anyone else. YT are unlikely to heed any protests by a UK minister. They take their own decisions. So, as far as you are concerned, free speech can be thwarted without a reason? Regardless that there is no proof of discretion? Don't you think that innocence until proof of guilt "ought" to be applied?
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 06 Jan 21 11.17am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
If they did, which is something I have never heard, it just goes to prove they didn't get everything wrong. Even broken clocks are right twice a day! Yeah, like it isn't a huge plank of authoritarian rule or anything. Here's a heads up....Nothing about the Soviet rule on freedom was right and that includes its justifications for the control of media.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  06 Jan 21 11.50am |
|
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Eden Eagle Kent 06 Jan 21 6.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The suggestion apparently is that they have allowed some contributors to spread disinformation which at this time is dangerous. Free speech has to be matched by responsibility. It cannot be absolute. Can you supply any evidence to support your comment WE?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 06 Jan 21 6.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Eden Eagle
Can you supply any evidence to support your comment WE? Dont hold your breath!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 06 Jan 21 8.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by croydon proud
Probably wouldn"t annoy me as much spider, he would just be a liar, not a CON liar, most politicians just toe the party line and the annoying bit is them thinking we believe them.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
can’t say I disagree with you 
Login / RegisterAll images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.