This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
WHU don’t own their ground. I’m not sure how, if at all, this influences FFP. I would have thought that a ground value must be factored into a club’s wealth. I presume WHU also have to pay rent or did Khant let them off that as well?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Harpo64
West Ham are a much bigger club than Palace on all fronts. Rubbish, similar size team
“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad
Rubbish, similar size team Except they have a bigger ground (by far), a more expensive squad (by far), have been in the prem more consistently than us (17 years from the last 20, vs 10 for us). That being said, over the last 8 years our league position has been pretty consistent. They probably average a little higher than us (over that period) but I'd doubt by much
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
They’ve reaped the rewards of lockdown. Keeping their toxic fanbase away, allowed them to build a platform. But when it’s not going so well, that ground will become a cauldron negativity again and it’ll all go to sh*t.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad
Rubbish, similar size team Actually I’ve got to say on Saturday how beefy their players looked. They all looked really chunky. I’ve always thought of say Declan Rice as being slim like say Tomkins but he and indeed all their team looked like they were popping out their kit. Anyone else notice that?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Without meaning to sound sarcastic... we literally just lost to West Ham. They're a good side. But they're open to being surpassed, just might take a couple of years
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by MrRobbo
Except they have a bigger ground (by far), a more expensive squad (by far), have been in the prem more consistently than us (17 years from the last 20, vs 10 for us). That being said, over the last 8 years our league position has been pretty consistent. They probably average a little higher than us (over that period) but I'd doubt by much They don't have a ground, and they pay less wages than us, they mainly buy from smaller players
“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad
They don't have a ground, and they pay less wages than us, they mainly buy from smaller players Clubs i meant not players
“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
West Ham are a richer club than us, helped by the size of their stadium and minimal related costs (subsidised by all Londoners), which will make it increasingly difficult for us to close the gap. Edited by Bearcage (05 Jan 2022 7.20am)
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
At the moment one could argue that we are the joint-worst PL team in London.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad
They don't have a ground, and they pay less wages than us, they mainly buy from smaller players What a load of tripe WH have a 99 year lease, so they effectively own the ground. Regardless of ownership they still have a much bigger ground than us (likely bigger than we'll ever have) Over the last 4 seasons they have spent over £300 mill on transfers (we've spent about £100m), buying from the likes of Dortmund, Lazio, Arsenal, Villarreal. Also why does it matter who you buy from?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by MrRobbo
What a load of tripe WH have a 99 year lease, so they effectively own the ground. Regardless of ownership they still have a much bigger ground than us (likely bigger than we'll ever have) Over the last 4 seasons they have spent over £300 mill on transfers (we've spent about £100m), buying from the likes of Dortmund, Lazio, Arsenal, Villarreal. Also why does it matter who you buy from? It doesn’t. And having the Olympic stadium built on their doorstep is not the point either. They’re bigger because they have a bigger fanbase and because they’ve had a more successful history than us. The reality is though, that we’ve been on a par with them for a long time and their recent improvements on the pitch are what we should be striving for. And I think we’re heading the right way on that front.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.