You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Is Islam, the new Nazi ?
November 11 2026 6.20am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Is Islam, the new Nazi ?


Page 20 of 25 < 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 >
Red-Blue-Yellow Flag Surrey 07 Jul 14 11.58am

Quote serial thriller at 07 Jul 2014 11.28am

Quote Red-Blue-Yellow at 07 Jul 2014 11.11am

For what it's worth:
All 'extremist' positions are pervertions...
ISIS and other such groups are pervertions of Islam.
Souther Baptists etc are pervertions of Christianity.
Modern Israel is a pervertion of Judaism.
Communism is a pervertion of Socialism.
Naziism is a pervertion of Nationalism.
Even the near extinction of Native Americans can be seen as a pervertion of Colonialism.
By the same logic, the 'New World Order' of Global Capitalism is a pervertion of Feudalism.

Everything in moderation would be a good watch word for a sane planet...but we humans are prone to taking things too far and seeing things in terms of absolutes, we pervert logic,science, even 'common sense', for our own ends; which usually only amount to greed and lust motivated by ignorance, fear of 'the other' and our impotence in the face of natural forces and our own mortality.
These behaviours are essentially immature and like most immature actions, they will haunt us and exact a price on future generations.


I like your posts on the whole, but come on, this is bollocks.

We set our arbitrary measures on what is 'extreme' on either side, then kid ourselves that there is some mathematical mid-point we can work out and say that's what we should do.

Take your point about Colonialism and the Native Americans. I assume you didn't, but someone could suggest the extremities on offer are: no Colonialism, or extinction of a whole race. Thus the moderate position may be said to be moderate Colonialism, but were China to march troops in to Parliament and declare that we were now under their benevolent rule, I imagine the reaction on HOL would not be 'oh well, at least they acted in moderation'.

Back to the thread point, I find the whole thing f*cking depressing. It's like Islam is some new idea which has only just found credence and is now going to take over the world, rape your kids and punch your wife in the face. It's been around for millennia and, like other ideologies, had and has some nutters connected to it, but actually on the whole it's also done a lot of good and the only person suffering from you pissing your knickers over it is yourself.

Thanks for that.....but I think you've gone a touch extreme on the moderation....if you see what I mean!

The real point is that we've had instructive teachings about loving and caring for each other from Buddha, Christ, Mohammed etc. yet have managed to turn them into creeds of hate and exploitation.
I'll come clean, as a Christian(heretical but still a Christian), I see all human problems as stemming from how we treat ourselves and others. I can't really improve on "do unto others as you would be done by".

 

I also enjoy posting on: Love Everton Forum, the Acceptable Face of Scouse Football.
[Link]
twitter.com/LuvEvertonForum
Come and give it a look, new members would be lovely.
Come and JOIN.
Or they'll nick your telly.
serial thriller Flag The Promised Land 07 Jul 14 12.16pm

Quote Red-Blue-Yellow at 07 Jul 2014 11.58am

Quote serial thriller at 07 Jul 2014 11.28am

Quote Red-Blue-Yellow at 07 Jul 2014 11.11am

For what it's worth:
All 'extremist' positions are pervertions...
ISIS and other such groups are pervertions of Islam.
Souther Baptists etc are pervertions of Christianity.
Modern Israel is a pervertion of Judaism.
Communism is a pervertion of Socialism.
Naziism is a pervertion of Nationalism.
Even the near extinction of Native Americans can be seen as a pervertion of Colonialism.
By the same logic, the 'New World Order' of Global Capitalism is a pervertion of Feudalism.

Everything in moderation would be a good watch word for a sane planet...but we humans are prone to taking things too far and seeing things in terms of absolutes, we pervert logic,science, even 'common sense', for our own ends; which usually only amount to greed and lust motivated by ignorance, fear of 'the other' and our impotence in the face of natural forces and our own mortality.
These behaviours are essentially immature and like most immature actions, they will haunt us and exact a price on future generations.


I like your posts on the whole, but come on, this is bollocks.

We set our arbitrary measures on what is 'extreme' on either side, then kid ourselves that there is some mathematical mid-point we can work out and say that's what we should do.

Take your point about Colonialism and the Native Americans. I assume you didn't, but someone could suggest the extremities on offer are: no Colonialism, or extinction of a whole race. Thus the moderate position may be said to be moderate Colonialism, but were China to march troops in to Parliament and declare that we were now under their benevolent rule, I imagine the reaction on HOL would not be 'oh well, at least they acted in moderation'.

Back to the thread point, I find the whole thing f*cking depressing. It's like Islam is some new idea which has only just found credence and is now going to take over the world, rape your kids and punch your wife in the face. It's been around for millennia and, like other ideologies, had and has some nutters connected to it, but actually on the whole it's also done a lot of good and the only person suffering from you pissing your knickers over it is yourself.

Thanks for that.....but I think you've gone a touch extreme on the moderation....if you see what I mean!

The real point is that we've had instructive teachings about loving and caring for each other from Buddha, Christ, Mohammed etc. yet have managed to turn them into creeds of hate and exploitation.
I'll come clean, as a Christian(heretical but still a Christian), I see all human problems as stemming from how we treat ourselves and others. I can't really improve on "do unto others as you would be done by".


Fair enough.

We all have our beliefs, which we convince ourselves will improve the world, reach a utopia, or unify mankind. Be it religion, socialism (as for me), or science, but I think we all know, somewhere inside of us, that the world will always change, we will never reach a perfect society, and that just as movements which seemed impenetrable before have fallen, so too will our dreams and aspirations one day crumble to dust.

One day Capitalism will seem archaic and ridiculous, but so too one day will people look back on whatever replaces it in a similar way. We like to pretend there is some sort of positive progression but actually we still have war, death, hatred, poverty in abundance. Yeah we can go in to a shop and choose from 25 different types of hat we wanna wear, and yes we can get to Manchester in less than 3 hours without the need of equine assistance, but have we actually progressed at all since we left the cave mouth, or do we just kid ourselves in a silly game?

For more philosophical ramblings from Serial Thriller, contact my agent. I am available for children's parties.

 

If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4

bright&wright Flag 10 Jul 14 4.57pm

Quote Kermit8 at 24 Jun 2014 9.57am

Forget the muslim extremists we have the old dears and codgers, mums and a few lairy types within Unite Against Fascism to worry about.

The Far Right with their xenophobia and hate do not like them, do they?

Wonder which side our WW2 soldiers would have been on given the choice?

Edited by Kermit8 (24 Jun 2014 9.58am)


When the EDL (who I do not support in anyway before you try and lump me in with them) went to peacefully protest against the murder of Lee Rigby the UAF turned up and there were 54 arrests. Every single arrest were members of the UAF.

Oh and guess who was a member of the UAF? Michael Adebolajo. Want to remind everyone who he is?

So, just old dears and codgers then old boy?

 

'We are going to make a little bit of history here’ Mr. J. Ertl.
Alexi_the_Eagle Flag Newton-le-Willows 10 Jul 14 5.22pm

Quote bright&wright at 10 Jul 2014 4.57pm

Quote Kermit8 at 24 Jun 2014 9.57am

Forget the muslim extremists we have the old dears and codgers, mums and a few lairy types within Unite Against Fascism to worry about.

The Far Right with their xenophobia and hate do not like them, do they?

Wonder which side our WW2 soldiers would have been on given the choice?

Edited by Kermit8 (24 Jun 2014 9.58am)


When the EDL (who I do not support in anyway before you try and lump me in with them) went to peacefully protest against the murder of Lee Rigby the UAF turned up and there were 54 arrests. Every single arrest were members of the UAF.

Oh and guess who was a member of the UAF? Michael Adebolajo. Want to remind everyone who he is?

So, just old dears and codgers then old boy?


The UAF are a lunatic fringe movement from the far left, it's usually them causing all the trouble when the EDL (I do not support them in any shape or form) protest.

 

"Look at that. Accident blackspot? These aren't accidents! They're throwing themselves into the road gladly! Throwing themselves into the road to escape all this hideousness!"

Kermit8 Flag Hevon 10 Jul 14 8.41pm

Quote bright&wright at 10 Jul 2014 4.57pm

Quote Kermit8 at 24 Jun 2014 9.57am

Forget the muslim extremists we have the old dears and codgers, mums and a few lairy types within Unite Against Fascism to worry about.

The Far Right with their xenophobia and hate do not like them, do they?

Wonder which side our WW2 soldiers would have been on given the choice?

Edited by Kermit8 (24 Jun 2014 9.58am)


When the EDL (who I do not support in anyway before you try and lump me in with them) went to peacefully protest against the murder of Lee Rigby the UAF turned up and there were 54 arrests. Every single arrest were members of the UAF.

Oh and guess who was a member of the UAF? Michael Adebolajo. Want to remind everyone who he is?

So, just old dears and codgers then old boy?


Adebolajo was not a member but did go on a march and speak his poison when he managed to get the microphone.

UAF does have some dodgy muslims but the vast majority aren't of that persuasion which brings me on to another point......


My dad grew up with an extremely extreme right-wing bloke called Hitler on the horizon and I grew up with London being bombed every other week by the IRA and watching the TV news most nights with Black September, the Baader-Meinhof lot, the Red Brigades and others kidnapping, bombing and shooting their way through Europe and the UK occasionally. And I won't add too much about the constant and very real threat of nuclear war breaking out apart from the fact we were...a bit bloody concerned.

If you wanna have sleepless nights because some looney tunes, who may or may not have once had some sort of experience with UAF no matter how tenuous, once in a blue moon, give our security service the slip that's fine. But excuse me if I don't join up to the Wet Knickers Brigade with you just yet.


Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 8.47pm)

 

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]
matt_himself Flag Matataland 10 Jul 14 8.55pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 8.41pm

Quote bright&wright at 10 Jul 2014 4.57pm

Quote Kermit8 at 24 Jun 2014 9.57am

Forget the muslim extremists we have the old dears and codgers, mums and a few lairy types within Unite Against Fascism to worry about.

The Far Right with their xenophobia and hate do not like them, do they?

Wonder which side our WW2 soldiers would have been on given the choice?

Edited by Kermit8 (24 Jun 2014 9.58am)


When the EDL (who I do not support in anyway before you try and lump me in with them) went to peacefully protest against the murder of Lee Rigby the UAF turned up and there were 54 arrests. Every single arrest were members of the UAF.

Oh and guess who was a member of the UAF? Michael Adebolajo. Want to remind everyone who he is?

So, just old dears and codgers then old boy?


Adebolajo was not a member but did go on a march and speak his poison when he managed to get the microphone.

UAF does have some dodgy muslims but the vast majority aren't of that persuasion which brings me on to another point......


My dad grew up with an extremely extreme right-wing bloke called Hitler on the horizon and I grew up with London being bombed every other week by the IRA and watching the TV news most nights with Black September, the Baader-Meinhof lot, the Red Brigades and others kidnapping, bombing and shooting their way through Europe and the UK occasionally. And I won't add too much about the constant and very real threat of nuclear war breaking out apart from the fact we were...a bit bloody concerned.

If you wanna have sleepless nights because some looney tunes, who may or may not have once had some sort of experience with UAF no matter how tenuous, once in a blue moon, give our security service the slip that's fine. But excuse me if I don't join up to the Wet Knickers Brigade with you just yet.


Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 8.47pm)


Seems that well known right wing bigot Peter Tatchell thinks that the UAF has a 'selective approach to bigotry'.

[Link]

 

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 10 Jul 14 9.06pm

^^^^^^


"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."


He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)

 

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]
Alexi_the_Eagle Flag Newton-le-Willows 10 Jul 14 9.07pm

Ironic how the UAF are against the EDL and BNP when it comes down to violence. Weyman Bennett is a thoroughly nasty piece of work.

 

"Look at that. Accident blackspot? These aren't accidents! They're throwing themselves into the road gladly! Throwing themselves into the road to escape all this hideousness!"

Kermit8 Flag Hevon 10 Jul 14 9.11pm

Quote Alexi_the_Eagle at 10 Jul 2014 9.07pm

Ironic how the UAF are against the EDL and BNP when it comes down to violence. Weyman Bennett is a thoroughly nasty piece of work.


The Hard Left have used violence often as a tactic. Hit them back twice as hard as they hit you. Police, right-wing fascist groups, etc.

 

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]
matt_himself Flag Matataland 10 Jul 14 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^


"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."


He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)


Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously.

You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support.

 

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 10 Jul 14 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^


"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."


He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)


Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously.

You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support.


Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?

 
matt_himself Flag Matataland 10 Jul 14 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^


"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."


He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)


Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously.

You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support.


Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?


Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

 

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 10 Jul 14 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^


"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."


He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)


Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously.

You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support.


Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?


Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?

 
matt_himself Flag Matataland 10 Jul 14 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^


"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."


He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)


Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously.

You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support.


Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?


Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?


As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this.

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

 

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 10 Jul 14 10.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^


"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."


He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)


Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously.

You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support.


Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?


Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?


As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this.

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion?

 
matt_himself Flag Matataland 10 Jul 14 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^


"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."


He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)


Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously.

You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support.


Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?


Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?


As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this.

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion?

Read about economics.

 

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 10 Jul 14 10.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^


"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."


He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)


Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously.

You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support.


Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?


Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?


As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this.

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion?

Read about economics.


So you can't define what a sizable proportion is, even though you claim to know what you mean, you can't let everyone else know.
My guess is that there are a few bad eggs in the UAF and that you are exagerating how many there actually are.

 
matt_himself Flag Matataland 10 Jul 14 10.35pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^


"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."


He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)


Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously.

You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support.


Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?


Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?


As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this.

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion?

Read about economics.


So you can't define what a sizable proportion is, even though you claim to know what you mean, you can't let everyone else know.
My guess is that there are a few bad eggs in the UAF and that you are exagerating how many there actually are.


You can think what you want. Don't make it right though.

 

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 10 Jul 14 10.40pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.35pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^


"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."


He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)


Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously.

You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support.


Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?


Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?


As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this.

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion?

Read about economics.


So you can't define what a sizable proportion is, even though you claim to know what you mean, you can't let everyone else know.
My guess is that there are a few bad eggs in the UAF and that you are exagerating how many there actually are.


You can think what you want. Don't make it right .though.


there you go then. You can't answer a simple question. Goodnight.

 
matt_himself Flag Matataland 10 Jul 14 10.44pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.40pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.35pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^


"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."


He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)


Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously.

You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support.


Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?


Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?


As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this.

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion?

Read about economics.


So you can't define what a sizable proportion is, even though you claim to know what you mean, you can't let everyone else know.
My guess is that there are a few bad eggs in the UAF and that you are exagerating how many there actually are.


You can think what you want. Don't make it right .though.


there you go then. You can't answer a simple question. Goodnight.


No. I refused to play your diversionary games.

 

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Page 20 of 25 < 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Is Islam, the new Nazi ?