This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
f*** the disabled I'd rather f*** the rich. As long as they are paying for the meal.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
97% of the world countries are 'defenceless' against nuclear attack and, let's face it, if nuclear missiles were launched in our direction our 'defence' could do fvck all about it. If dear boy.... The fact that we have five nuclear armed subs ready to throw back is the defence. It's called assured mutual destruction. Most of those 97 percent have their arses covered by a nuclear ally. You are getting a repuation Kermy....Your stats should really start with a disclaimer. Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Apr 2017 6.42pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Be interesting to see which of these policies people don't agree with.
£10 minimum wage for all workers over the age of 18 All rented accommodation to be fit for human habitation Renationalise the railways Renationalise the NHS Free school meals Create a National Education Service Scrap tuition fees Restore NHS Bursaries Increase the carers allowance Create a National Investment Bank End the public sector pay freeze End sweetheart tax deals between HMRC and massive corporations Stop major corporations ripping off their suppliers Reverse the Tory corporation tax cuts Defend Human Rights Zero Hours Contracts ban Holding the Tories to account over Brexit Housebuilding Combat inequality I find a lot to agree there N and thanks for your time spent over it. However over brexit you are telling us how the tories would be held to account not what the labour party will do if elected. IMO they should go for scrapping it altogether as the only real benefit of reducing immigration will not happen as labour and tories have both said. That could restore Labour with remainers that is 48%
|
|
|
Originally posted by Nest
So what are your nasty parties policies? Always use protection, no picture taking, and no means no. But I'm not sure what that has to do with anything...
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
If dear boy.... The fact that we have five nuclear armed subs ready to throw back is the defence. Most of those 97 percent have their arses covered by a nuclear ally. You are getting a repuation Kermy....Your stats should really start with a disclaimer. Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Apr 2017 6.42pm) Just takes a paranoid, nihilistic, narcissist who happens to be in charge of some nukes to laugh at our defence at his/her finger hits the button. Do you not watch Bond movies? But, luckily, past leaders around the globe have never shown those traits. Ever.
I should tell the wife really. Edited by Kermit8 (20 Apr 2017 7.10pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
If dear boy.... The fact that we have five nuclear armed subs ready to throw back is the defence. It's called assured mutual destruction. Most of those 97 percent have their arses covered by a nuclear ally. You are getting a repuation Kermy....Your stats should really start with a disclaimer. Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Apr 2017 6.42pm) There is no defence against nuclear attack as the UK would be obliterated. Firing weapons just before you are incinerated is not much use but taking your point as a deterrent we cannot know whether the 1 armed submarine on duty would actually deter. If an enemy was able to ascertain that the weapon was not capable of destroying them then its frying tonight. We wouldn't need to worry about the Palace result in that case..........
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
The first priority of any government is the security of its citizens/subjects. Funny Nick....but you seem to have missed that out.....You missed out that Oorbyn will leave this country defenseless to nuclear attack....hence requiring protection from America or leaving itself open to blackmail or destruction. Why didn't you mention that?
I don't feel threatened by other nuclear-armed states - that's because the UK isn't actually threatened by any of them. I'd rather my government fixed the nation from the inside before it spunks billions on "protecting" it from all those boogeymen on the outside.
Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune) |
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Check out how much your local school will be losing because of Tory policy. Here is how Bromley will be affected. Look at the numbers of teachers that will be lost as a result. Edited by nickgusset (20 Apr 2017 8.38pm)
|
|
| croydon proud |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Check out how much your local school will be losing because of Tory policy. Here is how Bromley will be affected. Look at the numbers of teachers that will be lost as a result. Edited by nickgusset (20 Apr 2017 8.38pm)
|
|
|
Bloody Costa not paying their taxes. Oh...........................
|
|
|
Originally posted by Nest
So what are your nasty parties policies? Interesting how the left always insult and name call but accuse the Tories of being nasty. I may be wrong but it isn't the Tories with an anti Semitic problem
|
|
|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
Interesting how the left always insult and name call but accuse the Tories of being nasty. I may be wrong but it isn't the Tories with an anti Semitic problem It was the PM herself who first called the tories the 'nasty party'.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
It was the PM herself who first called the tories the 'nasty party'. What she actually said is that some people call the Tories the nasty party.
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Dennis ain't wrong.
|
|
|
Dimetrodon
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Dimetrodon ageist
|
|
|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
What she actually said is that some people call the Tories the nasty party. She obviously knew nit-picker
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Strong and stable government eh?
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Strong and stable government eh? Get a life man. That is pathetic.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Get a life man. That is pathetic. Totally agree about the pathetic and risible contents of the attachment. Gussett incessantly trawling the Internet for left-wing anti-Tory bile.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.