May's campaign has genuinely been one of the most arrogant and complacent that I can remember of any party's in any election in my voting life.

Can you show me anything demonstrates this? All I've seen is statements to the effect that their priority is the interests of the EU-27, they want a good and positive relationship going forward and before any negotiations on a deal can commence there first needs to be agreement on the divorce bill, irish border and rights on EU nationals. The 100bn figure hasn't actually been endorsed by the EU-27.

I agree that it is in the interests of all to be sensible and try and reach a mutually beneficial solution. Shame that May, Davis, Boris etc are doing their best to start us off on the wrong foot and making threats.

So you can't show me anything then. Clearly you're not paying attention as it sounds like you've only read the headline of that article.

No official statement from anyone, merely a quote from a (frankly irrelevant) Marine Le Pen, a statement of fact from Merkel (note she says "full access", not simply free trade).

Then the quote from the Netherlands PM says nothing about wanting to punish the UK, simply, and accurately, that there is no plan, the UK is under-prepared and May doesn't have the team to negotiate and that we need to realise this quickly (which is true).

That article says nothing about the EU wanting a bad deal for the UK, just simply that their priorities are the EU-27 (duh).

The headline in fact makes no sense. The body of article itself implies that the EU want a hard Brexit far from Sabotaging it! Terrible journalism.

Even if that was true(which it isn't),when the influx of Commies voted Corbyn in as leader, everyone knew Labour would be condemned to the political wilderness.
They will never get into power until they have a leader and real policies (not empty promises) that are representative of the majority, not minorities, unions and loony idealists.

You really do look at things differently to the rest of us as it has been said so many many times on the news and in the press that we are going to get a hard ride in the negotiations and they are going to make us pay for leaving the EU. I would have thought that someone who professes to know all as you do you would have noticed it time and time again. That is why David Davis has told them to get stuffed. I am sure you read only what you what to read and see and spend all day on the web dreaming up and posting all manner of things to make you look smart...but you aint!

May was complaining that Corbyn was doing too much on the tele and she wanted to talk to ordinary voters (not that she has mind). He has being doing loads more interviews and meetings than her, plus he turned up to debate and she didn't. It is not him hiding, it is her.

To be honest the BBC or should I say CBC (Corbyns Broadcasting Company)has been following Corbyn every where and left May out in the cold. I think it is because the BBC has always lent towards Labour all these years.
Thank god the election is tomorrow and we can get down to sorting Brexit out as May needs to get her arse in gear and sort out the EU countries dying to have a go at us. I suppose though there will be thread after thread of how Corbyn got ripped off, the vote was fixed etc.... But hey ho that's politics.

From the New Statesman:
"In the same 2006 interview he [McDonnell] argued that the first-past-the-post electoral system and “the affinity and loyalty of the large section of the labour movement and of the working class” to Labour (“you can call it false consciousness or whatever”) meant for “very pragmatic reasons” it was “important to work within” the party ... “It's the old Gramsci thing - we're trying to win the battle of ideas on the basis of a really thorough, democratic debate. So we're trying to win hegemony within both the party and the country. And then, use that battle of ideas to make sure we can reflect that in the battle of organisation within the movement overall.”

Antonio Gramsci, one of the most influential Marxist thinkers, advocated a “long march through the institutions”. This entailed working within established organisations (such as Labour) with the intention of winning them for the revolutionary cause.
McDonnell’s strategy was derided by leftists such as George Galloway. But with the election of Corbyn as leader it was vindicated. In 2006, McDonnell spoke presciently of a “dormant” left which could “easily be re-engaged” with Labour. Ed Miliband’s reform of the party’s leadership voting system in 2014 transferred sovereignty to them. In what he regarded as the twilight of his political career, McDonnell’s “long march” finally bore fruit."

So out of the 150000+ who joined Labour in the Corbyn era, how many are commies, keeping in mind that in 2015 the CPB polled 1229 votes and that there were in 2015 , 772 members of the party [Link] ?