This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
WE know that weapons are generally purchased with use in mind for sure but your view point is born from the idealistic notion that people will stop killing if you stop selling them weapons. They won't, and for the umpteenth time let me repeat that others will sell them weapons instead. So why are we not selling arms to ISIS when they would evidently be such a reliable customer?
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
And yet when a politician comes along promising to challenge that, you shout him down as a terrorist's friend... No, it's just politician's bollocks. He'd find out, very rapidly, that quitting the arms industry would be completely untenable. I "shout him down", as you call it, because what he says is utterly naïve and unrealistic.
|
|
|
Originally posted by legaleagle
Not entirely sure how that logic translates to say Saudis being better able to beat sh*t out of local shias and not sticking to anything we would call rules Also,not entirely sure in the US that people would trust others not to get illicit arms.. How ever you spin it, there is an economic and strategic reality about it that cannot be ignored in the real world.
|
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
So why are we not selling arms to ISIS when they would evidently be such a reliable customer? How do you know we haven't? We sold weapons to Saddam apparently.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
How do you know we haven't? We sold weapons to Saddam apparently. Oh wow ermmm...you got me there. Are you suggesting we are selling weapons to isis on the sly?
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
Oh wow ermmm...you got me there. Are you suggesting we are selling weapons to isis on the sly? I hope not, but they might have acquired British weapons second hand so to speak. The point is it doesn't really matter where they got them because they got them. There is no shortage of arms dealers.
|
|
|
Why was Fox News but not CNN blocked on Sky today?
|
|
|
Exit polls saying a hung parliament.
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
con 314
|
|
|
Now, where's my pal Stirling?
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
con 314 last exit poll that got it wrong was 92
|
|
|
I heard the polling stations looked very quiet during the day in Tory east Surrey.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
last exit poll that got it wrong was 92 Brexit?
COYP |
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
People scoffed when i mentioned the sheer numbers of those that joined labour will be the ones that make a difference.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Brexit? If I remember correctly the whole function of that was different to a general election exit poll.
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
I heard the polling stations looked very quiet during the day in Tory east Surrey. Voter fatigue was not mentioned much in the run-up which I found very surprising. Looks like it is going to be a very interesting night indeed. May could be the shortest serving PM ever which would be bloody marvellous. Don't think even Tory voters are convinced by her at all.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
watch channel 4! Anne Widdecombe is having a meltdown...
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.