This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by DanH
I hope this sneering at the young/student vote continues. Guaranteed to mobilise more people to vote when we have another inevitable election in the next year or so. At 72% it's gone well over the university pre grad/ post grad percentage so it'll have to deliver jobs and not the feared rising inflation and interest rates or they'll be put off again for years. There is a kind of irony in their vote because of this and also in their pro immigration EU vote but I get the former, not so much the latter.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
I hope this sneering at the young/student vote continues. Guaranteed to mobilise more people to vote when we have another inevitable election in the next year or so.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
No people are horrible. 'Hell is other people'.
|
|
|
Well there was a little matter of another referendum in 2011 (see link), the British people spoke then, and the British people are assumed to know best just like in the Brexit referendum. While the Brexit referendum was disgraceful powerplay in the Conservative party by Cameron, I have little sympathy for the "whining young voters" claiming Brexit was not decided by them. They turned out in these elections but British Politics would probably have looked different if they had bothered to vote in the Brexit referendum.
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Possibly. 318 Conservative Seats subtract 261 Labour seats is 57 seats. The tories polled 2.4% more than Labour, which I don't think works out as 57 more seats.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
At 72% it's gone well over the university pre grad/ post grad percentage so it'll have to deliver jobs and not the feared rising inflation and interest rates or they'll be put off again for years. There is a kind of irony in their vote because of this and also in their pro immigration EU vote but I get the former, not so much the latter. The flipside of the immigration/movement debate is that a lot of young people, particularly those who have graduate jobs, often see opportunities in themselves going abroad for a few years. Plenty of my friends have spent a year or two working in other countries (EU and non-EU), and were quite annoyed that this would be unlikely to be repeated in the future.
Employee of the month is a good example of how someone can be both a winner and a loser at the same time. |
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Labour membership up by 150,000 since the election. Now hitting 800,000 mark.
If only 1% knock on doors, that's still a lot of activists and campaigners. Probably helped to scupper May. I was laughed at when I said rank and file campaigners will make a difference. If your intention is to tell us there are a lot of gullible people in the world, I think PT Barnum might have beat you to it.
|
|
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
If your intention is to tell us there are a lot of gullible people in the world, I think PT Barnum might have beat you to it. Funny, I always think that of people who vote conservative who buy into the whole more for less mentality. Of course I also don't believe politicians when they promise anything that seems too good to be true.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Funny, I always think that of people who vote conservative who buy into the whole more for less mentality. Of course I also don't believe politicians when they promise anything that seems too good to be true. What is that exactly?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
If your intention is to tell us there are a lot of gullible people in the world, I think PT Barnum might have beat you to it. Yeah cos the rest are all such independent thinkers aren't they! How else would the inspired decisions of Trump and Brexit come about? Thank God the economic conservatives geniuses live amongst us. If only those French weren't so gullible.
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Funny, I always think that of people who vote conservative who buy into the whole more for less mentality. Of course I also don't believe politicians when they promise anything that seems too good to be true. It's funny that conservatives want to take sentiment away from every single argument but fail to ever mention the damage on the economy of consistent cuts and austerity.
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
Yeah cos the rest are all such independent thinkers aren't they! How else would the inspired decisions of Trump and Brexit come about? Thank God the economic conservatives geniuses live amongst us. If only those French weren't so gullible. I don't think many people in the electorate make informed choices. It's just that voting for Corbyn on the basis that he is 'a nice man' or 'in touch with the people' or creating 'a new brand of politics' is so staggeringly misguided and naive.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I don't think many people in the electorate make informed choices. It's just that voting for Corbyn on the basis that he is 'a nice man' or 'in touch with the people' or creating 'a new brand of politics' is so staggeringly misguided and naive. Or perhaps some saw that the alternative was in fact far more reckless for society. Every set of policies will always have a legitimate counter argument, perhaps the reason him being a "nice man" was worth a lot more than Tories expected.
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
It's funny that conservatives want to take sentiment away from every single argument but fail to ever mention the damage on the economy of consistent cuts and austerity. You do understand that 'austerity' was for a reason, not just to be mean? And 'austerity' really isn't very austere in 2017. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (12 Jun 2017 3.15pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
Or perhaps some saw that the alternative was in fact far more reckless for society. Every set of policies will always have a legitimate counter argument, perhaps the reason him being a "nice man" was worth a lot more than Tories expected. Perhaps, but very disturbing in terms of what people will vote for.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You do understand that 'austerity' was for a reason, not just to be mean? And 'austerity' really isn't very austere in 2017. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (12 Jun 2017 3.15pm) No of course I don't understand that, I'm deluded remember. It's the level and length of Austerity that is damaging, this is "basic economics". I'd argue you've got your head buried in the sand if you can't see the chronic underfunding of our public services. Do you not see the damage that the crisis of our Schools and NHS will have on the economy? Besides the fact that it's a bit mean as well.
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
|
Corbyn and Labour back to the left and right hand etc
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
No of course I don't understand that, I'm deluded remember. It's the level and length of Austerity that is damaging, this is "basic economics". I'd argue you've got your head buried in the sand if you can't see the chronic underfunding of our public services. Do you not see the damage that the crisis of our Schools and NHS will have on the economy? Besides the fact that it's a bit mean as well. What I see is trying to fund these services at a level that is sustainable. Throwing borrowed monet at things didn't work under Labour last time and it won't in the future. The NHS in particular needs to be more accountable for what it spends and needs to be realistic about what it can do.
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
What I see is trying to fund these services at a level that is sustainable. Throwing borrowed monet at things didn't work under Labour last time and it won't in the future. The NHS in particular needs to be more accountable for what it spends and needs to be realistic about what it can do. Is that a reference to the political landscape? I think you can do better, put yer art into it a bit more.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
What I see is trying to fund these services at a level that is sustainable. Throwing borrowed monet at things didn't work under Labour last time and it won't in the future. The NHS in particular needs to be more accountable for what it spends and needs to be realistic about what it can do. It's a good job they were proposing to fund it through tax increases then wasn't it. If not they'd only be adding to the current Tory policy of borrowing more than all labour governments put together. Quite an achievement in fairness when you include the Blair era in that.
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.