I am sure some do. However do not under estimate how many are incredibly unhappy. Unhappy with the attacks, unhappy with Shami Chakrabarti and how she was "rewarded" and unhappy with Corbyn's lack of leadership on the issue

Before the EU Referendum, the Remain camp told us that the economy would collapse, the pound would fall 20% against the dollar, the FTSE would nosedive and companies flee from Britain. None of this has of course happened, apart from a much less steep fall in the value of the pound. Instead the FTSE has reached record highs, the economy has grown and companies are investing in Britain.
However, if Corbyn's Labour are elected all of the dire predictions would come to pass - in spades. Yet many of the very people who tried to scare us with the doom-mongering are telling us to vote Labour.

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

There are a few reports about library service reductions in which councillors talk about the need for austerity, as if austerity were some new-fangled wheeze that just occurred to them: "Tell you what, Reg, Linda, why don't we all tighten our belts and safeguard the service?" Oh, never heard that one before and of course, far from safeguarding any of the services given a quick austerity fix, those services have been pauperised then privatised. Austerity was always a delusion, a fundamental shift of wealth, control and influence from public service to private acquisition, from poor to rich.
Austerity crucified Greece, plunging it into a shattering economic crisis reminiscent of the 1930s. George Osborne missed every deficit target while administering it and added half a trillion pounds to the national debt. As the International Monetary Fund noted, they had "massively understated the damage that spending cuts inflict on a weak economy” and found that all economic research backing austerity “has been discredited.” Nonetheless lamentable George Osborne declared austerity permanent and his successor Philip Hammond continues to argue its effectiveness against all the arguments to the contrary. May is a permanent austerian too, in as much as she has any ideology except her own career and the electoral fortunes of the Tory Party as the key body defending British capital. UK wages are growing more slowly than in any European nation except Greece with very high numbers of short term, part time and 'self-employed' jobs explaining the Tories boast about high employment.
Austerity was always a con. It is now a demonstrably bankrupt one.

Never heard such nonsense about the TV debate for some time.

It has been reported that Mrs May will appear in a 'Question Time' format rather than a head-to-head debate where the format favours opposition parties.

TV debates in the past have turned elections into a 'X Factor' type talent show. Why should Mrs May demean her 'High office' by agreeing to equal billing with political 'Lightweights', some might deem misfits, who are united only in their hostility to Brexit and the Conservative Party ?

Anyway I've got a busy day out campaigning etc so no more from me today on this thread.

By all accounts ITV will empty chair her. (may not Willo)

They will be wrong to if they do. Trying to bully her, or anyone in to appearing is wrong.

Empty chairing smacks of political bias too.

The fall in the pound isn't much less than 20% as he says. It is 20%. And I voted Leave.

COYP

Do you know whether there will be freedom of movement
Do you know whether European residents will be allowed to stay
Do you know whether we will have any trade agreements in place come Brexit Day?

No one, absolutely no one knows what will happen. It may be the best thing that has happened to the country in 50 years, it could be the worst. Time will tell.

I wouldn't crow about it just yet, as Rudi says the pound has dropped 20% already. And yes, I am aware that there are pros and cons to that

Brexit hasn't happened yet. Jobs are, as we speak, being moved out of the UK, along with international agencies and companies.

The FTSE moves with negative correlation to the pound and the value of the pound reflects investors confidence in the future of the underlying economy. These things weren't predicted to happen 24th June, but over time post Brexit.

What has already happen, ironically, is billions of pounds worth of UK property has been sold from UK investors and pension funds to foreign investors, mainly from Asia, the biggest example is the Cheesegrater which was sold by British Land to a Chinese company for over £1bn. Just a fortnight ago a Chinese investor purchased the Nestle building and surrounding buildings in Croydon. This was brought about by UK investors being concerned about the future of the economy, particularly for office occupiers in London so pulling their money out, and the fall in the value of the pound, which made purchasing UK property using foreign currency much cheaper. Why is this ironic? Well the direct result of this is when British companies pay their rent each quarter a significantly larger proportion than pre-Brexit goes straight out of the country. Rather than going into a pension pot for UK citizens these rents now go to China or wherever else. This is basically like importing property. In a vote to stop letting people come here to work and contribute to society and the economy, the Brexit brigade has accelerated the removal of British assets owned by British interests and results in money flowing directly out of the economy.

The largest landowner in London is Qatar Holdings. The government of Qatar are the 51st biggest owner of London property. The government of Kuwait is the 16th. This has only got worse since 23rd June.

I take it you will be voting for Corbyn's Labour, in June. Sell it to me!