You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
October 31 2026 8.40pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)


Page 221 of 1552 < 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 >
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Jul 16 8.13pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

Who are you talking to?

You actually.

Sorry with all these left wing remain whingers. I get a bit confused.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (12 Jul 2016 8.23pm)

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Jul 16 8.20pm

Originally posted by Mr_Gristle

I'd be interested to see projections that were made on anything other than recent historical facts and present day evidence. Hang on, I guess that's exactly what I did see from the Leave Camp ;-)

It's not hard to plug in expected exchange rate change ranges and employment sentiment projections from Eu-facing companies in the event of either an In or Out vote. That's what empirical data and up to date client insight is for.

The models spit out results based on different variables.

If the models have got it wrong, then that's actually a really good thing for the country (and a pretty bad thing for the programmers).

Models are only as good as the programmer and the data you enter into them. This particular model must have been subject to a lot of guess work.

Forgive my skepticism.

 

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 12 Jul 16 8.26pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

You actually.

I see you have edited the post. You don't even blimmin read who is posting what you are answering to.

For those that missed it...

I'd be interested in your answer to the question though.

Edited by nickgusset (12 Jul 2016 8.28pm)

dont cover up your tracks hrolf.jpg Attachment: dont cover up your tracks hrolf.jpg (42.92Kb)

 

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 12 Jul 16 8.27pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

You actually.

Sorry with all these left wing remain whingers. I get a bit confused.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (12 Jul 2016 8.23pm)

I'm not a remain whinger. You obviously don't read properly. Check yer glasses out man.

 

Mr_Gristle Flag In the land of Whelk Eaters 12 Jul 16 8.28pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Models are only as good as the programmer and the data you enter into them. This particular model must have been subject to a lot of guess work.

Forgive my skepticism.

No problem - props for you staying on this thread to fly your particular flag.

The data is kosher. Any model is by definition a prediction and not a fact, I'll grant you. However, you need to forgive me for viewing concepts and rhetoric (from any source or side) with a lot more skepticism than I attach to evidence based prediction.

Pint?

 


Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Jul 16 8.28pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

I see you have edited the post. You don't even blimmin read who is posting what you are answering to.

For those that missed it...

Yes my mistake. I admit mine.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Jul 16 8.33pm

Originally posted by Mr_Gristle

No problem - props for you staying on this thread to fly your particular flag.

The data is kosher. Any model is by definition a prediction and not a fact, I'll grant you. However, you need to forgive me for viewing concepts and rhetoric (from any source or side) with a lot more skepticism than I attach to evidence based prediction.

Pint?

Fair enough but I would not rely on any financial projection to decide Britain's future. There is far more to it than economics in any case.

If you're buying...

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Jul 16 8.35pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

I'm not a remain whinger. You obviously don't read properly. Check yer glasses out man.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!

 

Mr_Gristle Flag In the land of Whelk Eaters 12 Jul 16 8.41pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Fair enough but I would not rely on any financial projection to decide Britain's future. There is far more to it than economics in any case.

If you're buying...

Yep, economics is one part of the arguement and not the whole one. But the UK my kids grow up in and their life chances are going to be impacted more by the economic state of the UK rather than it's demographic make up. I might not like it, but that's the way it seems to be for me.

Leave could have convinced me with facts - I don't have a closed mind.

Still, if Leave means no TTIP, then that's a win.

 


Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 12 Jul 16 8.47pm

Originally posted by Mr_Gristle

Yep, economics is one part of the arguement and not the whole one. But the UK my kids grow up in and their life chances are going to be impacted more by the economic state of the UK rather than it's demographic make up. I might not like it, but that's the way it seems to be for me.

Leave could have convinced me with facts - I don't have a closed mind.

Still, if Leave means no TTIP, then that's a win.

I'd imagine we'd get a deal worse than ttip if we want to trade more with the states.

 

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 12 Jul 16 8.47pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!

Again you are writing lies about me for your own gain. You learned well from the leave campaign.

 

Mr_Gristle Flag In the land of Whelk Eaters 12 Jul 16 8.50pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

I'd imagine we'd get a deal worse than ttip if we want to trade more with the states.

51st State. We're doomed Capt. Mainwaring! ;-)

 


Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Jul 16 9.15pm

Originally posted by Mr_Gristle

Yep, economics is one part of the arguement and not the whole one. But the UK my kids grow up in and their life chances are going to be impacted more by the economic state of the UK rather than it's demographic make up. I might not like it, but that's the way it seems to be for me.

Leave could have convinced me with facts - I don't have a closed mind.

Still, if Leave means no TTIP, then that's a win.

They are not mutually exclusive. It is also too presumptions to think that we can certain of the future.
Predicting the economic conditions Britain will face in 20 years is little more safe than predicting the weather in 20 years. I just can't share your pessimism.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Jul 16 9.16pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

Again you are writing lies about me for your own gain. You learned well from the leave campaign.

No one has lied about you Gusset.

 

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 13 Jul 16 12.15pm

Originally posted by tome

[Link]

Farage has said the £350m was a mistake. I guess partly if we did get the EEA option then we'd still have to pay, just have no say.

But not one they'd verified before plastering it on the sides of buses etc. The sum isn't the issue either, its the fact that they stated this openly and publicly as true, and then when called on it whisper about it being a mistake etc.

Which to me, suggests either they knew in advance, or didn't care. How hard is it to verify information? Not very. But they went ahead and did it anyway, because they knew it would create more support than it would damage.

No one in politics is so incompetent as to not double check their facts and data before a campaign. They knew it was 'a mistake', which makes it a lie.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 13 Jul 16 12.20pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

But not one they'd verified before plastering it on the sides of buses etc. The sum isn't the issue either, its the fact that they stated this openly and publicly as true, and then when called on it whisper about it being a mistake etc.

Which to me, suggests either they knew in advance, or didn't care. How hard is it to verify information? Not very. But they went ahead and did it anyway, because they knew it would create more support than it would damage.

No one in politics is so incompetent as to not double check their facts and data before a campaign. They knew it was 'a mistake', which makes it a lie.

Are we really still hung up on the fact that politicians exaggerate during campaigns?
If the Remains had won we would be talking about their nonsense.

 

Lyons550 Flag Shirley 13 Jul 16 12.24pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

So why didn't they say there was no plan before the referendum?

The only people that could and DID plan was the BoE...hence the banking system being more than robust enough to cope with the ripples the outcome has and will continue to cause.

The Tier 1 capital raised by our banks was in fact raised to deal with far worse scenarios then created by Brexit...but then Brexit isn't an economic crisis...unlike 2008 and as such it'll all settle down once we know the details of the withdrawal under Article 50.

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 13 Jul 16 12.28pm

Originally posted by Lyons550

The only people that could and DID plan was the BoE...hence the banking system being more than robust enough to cope with the ripples the outcome has and will continue to cause.

The Tier 1 capital raised by our banks was in fact raised to deal with far worse scenarios then created by Brexit...but then Brexit isn't an economic crisis...unlike 2008 and as such it'll all settle down once we know the details of the withdrawal under Article 50.

Of course settle down, doesn't necessarily mean in a positive way to some people. Although it'll be stable, doesn't mean it will be what people want. Just what it is.

I don't expect the UK to economically be as strong as it was out of the EU, that seems a bit absurd, given the size and power of the EU trading block. But surrendering some of our economic power, to obtain greater power to control over our economic future, even if its inferior, seems like a fair exchange.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 13 Jul 16 12.29pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

I'd imagine we'd get a deal worse than ttip if we want to trade more with the states.

Difference is, we'd have the option of not accepting that deal, and taking the economic hit.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Mapletree Flag Croydon 13 Jul 16 12.34pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Of course settle down, doesn't necessarily mean in a positive way to some people. Although it'll be stable, doesn't mean it will be what people want. Just what it is.

I don't expect the UK to economically be as strong as it was out of the EU, that seems a bit absurd, given the size and power of the EU trading block. But surrendering some of our economic power, to obtain greater power to control over our economic future, even if its inferior, seems like a fair exchange.

It's good to see you have the depth of pockets to take the hit then Jamie.

 

Page 221 of 1552 < 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic