This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by pefwin
is a zero hour contract, better than no contract?
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
There is some truth to that but many...well I'd say most actually don't want zero hours contracts but have to because the industry demands it. I was one of them for a time. Not recognising these realities doesn't really help the Tory brand in terms of being even handed. Not to mention how much power it give over employees with the capacity to withdraw hours. I know people on zero hour contracts who don't get paid for the time they travel between worksite meaning they lose two hours a day.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Stirling I am mindful of 'Both sides of the coin'. Just resentful of the way these are portrayed by Labour almost as if it is prevalent when it is not when less than 3% of the workforce work under these contractual arrangements. I think the Tories really hurt themselves with these kind of attitudes. Think about it Wilo. You say three percent...well the actual last figure I saw was 910,000 people in the Uk on zero hours. You say just say three percent....But think about it... when you drill down where that three percent come from...how many of them are doing ok? You can take out the higher and middle class straight away. That percentage those three percent are mostly coming from a set segment of society. The young and working class. Now that three percent actually becomes a large percent for that type of workforce. This election has shown just by ignoring the traditional working class Tory and allowing their standards of living to continually go down the Tories are going to allow in the far left. The number of working age working class Tories continues to go down and down. I think zero hours needs looking at....I think it needed looking at years ago. The 'I'm alright Jack' element that just thinks the Tories can just look after the greys and that this will win elections need to reconsider.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Not to mention how much power it give over employees with the capacity to withdraw hours. I know people on zero hour contracts who don't get paid for the time they travel between worksite meaning they lose two hours a day. Yep, and a lot of that type of worker just get treated pretty badly because they are so expendable. It wasn't a good time for me personally. It's not good for the country that the numbers for this kind of work get higher. It's use should be looked at I think.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Depends on how well those jobs pay. New labour created a lot of jobs. Its just they were low paid service McJobs. Its no good for society to have people stuck in dead end jobs with subsistence wages and next to no prospects.
That should be permanently on the mind of the relevant ministers. You would think that investment in science and information technology would be high on that agenda. We certainly can't compete in manufacturing against the globalized world.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I think the Tories really hurt themselves with these kind of attitudes. Think about it Wilo. You say three percent...well the actual last figure I saw was 910,000 people in the Uk on zero hours. You say just say three percent....But think about it... when you drill down where that three percent come from...how many of them are doing ok? You can take out the higher and middle class straight away. That percentage those three percent are mostly coming from a set segment of society. The young and working class. Now that three percent actually becomes a large percent for that type of workforce. This election has shown just by ignoring the traditional working class Tory and allowing their standards of living to continually go down the Tories are going to allow in the far left. The number of working age working class Tories continues to go down and down. I think zero hours needs looking at....I think it needed looking at years ago. The 'I'm alright Jack' element that just thinks the Tories can just look after the greys and that this will win elections need to reconsider. Good to have you back - the rational, logical and broader picture-minded Stirling. It's been quite a while.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I think the Tories really hurt themselves with these kind of attitudes. Think about it Wilo. You say three percent...well the actual last figure I saw was 910,000 people in the Uk on zero hours. You say just say three percent....But think about it... when you drill down where that three percent come from...how many of them are doing ok? You can take out the higher and middle class straight away. That percentage those three percent are mostly coming from a set segment of society. The young and working class. Now that three percent actually becomes a large percent for that type of workforce. This election has shown just by ignoring the traditional working class Tory and allowing their standards of living to continually go down the Tories are going to allow in the far left. The number of working age working class Tories continues to go down and down. I think zero hours needs looking at....I think it needed looking at years ago. The 'I'm alright Jack' element that just thinks the Tories can just look after the greys and that this will win elections need to reconsider. The pace of growth of hyper-flexible "zero-hours contracts", which do not guarantee workers a minimum amount of work, slowed markedly in the second half of 2016. The zero-hours "juggernaut" (as the 'Left' see it) is showing signs of slowing down, with barely any increase during the second half of 2016, according to Laura Gardiner, a senior policy analyst at the 'Resolution Foundation' think-tank. This slowdown is likely due to a strong jobs market meaning that job hunters now have more options available than taking a contract without guaranteed hours, firms being reluctant to be associated with using zero-hours contracts following the bad press received by firms like 'Sports Direct, and the high profile of these contracts meaning there is no backlog of people reporting being on one artificially boosting numbers. At the end of the day we have the lowest employment rate since 1975. Edited by Willo (17 Jun 2017 11.10pm)
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
The pace of growth of hyper-flexible "zero-hours contracts", which do not guarantee workers a minimum amount of work, slowed markedly in the second half of 2016. The zero-hours "juggernaut" (as the 'Left' see it) is showing signs of slowing down, with barely any increase during the second half of 2016, according to Laura Gardiner, a senior policy analyst at the 'Resolution Foundation' think-tank. This slowdown is likely due to a strong jobs market meaning that job hunters now have more options available than taking a contract without guaranteed hours, firms being reluctant to be associated with using zero-hours contracts following the bad press received by firms like 'Sports Direct, and the high profile of these contracts meaning there is no backlog of people reporting being on one artificially boosting numbers. At the end of the day we have the lowest employment rate since 1975. Nothing to crow about.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Good to have you back - the rational, logical and broader picture-minded Stirling. It's been quite a while. The Tories stand for things I believe in....Well, more than other parties do now Brexit is seemingly happening. But the working class Tory is becoming rarer as the party seems to retreat from them into its leafy areas and Elton graduates. Still, I come from a military family and I was brought up to have pride in my country. So far in my lifetime I can see that culturally, for the ideals of secularism, that the adage 'the west is best' isn't far off... and I see no problems with cultural ethnocentrism nor non violent nationalism. I don't believe in cultural revisionism nor multiculturalism nor so many of poorly thought out ideological ideas that I believe has been forced upon the nation. The natural pace of change needed to be far slower. So I guess I stand closer to Wilo than your good self. However this is in no means a slight to you as difference of viewpoint, with it's requirement for debate, is a healthy exercise for moderation in life. In cultures that don't encourage debate we see far harsher societies. I don't know if you are referring back to that previous thread and it's 'left is brighter than right' viewpoint but I'll just repeat my thoughts on it again...Mainly because it's important that it's stated. Someone's intelligence does not factor into believing in the same politics. If this were true then IQ breakdowns around the world would broadly fit into the same left/right/libertarian/authoritarian party support. A person's worldview, and hence political support is affected by far more than logic. Family upbringing and relationships and the nature of your environment form a far more important determinate. Anyone trying to suggest that Corbyn is say more intelligent than Putin is just being foolish.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| croydon proud |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Well I've worked in an industry where zero hours was your only choice and I have to say I don't agree with the one eyed nature of how you portray it. Some are fine with it in some industries because it fits their schedule...students for example...many though have little choice. Yes, try getting a mortgage on a zero hours contract, and whatever you do, dont get ill, you might starve to death if it goes on all week, and as for a holiday? The only people who like zero hours are students as mentioned or someone who has a partner earning good money and wants to get out of the house for a few hours a week!Lots of uber drivers love the scheme, they do a minimum amount of hours and get the tax payer to top up there income and pay there rent, and the company is worth £66 billion, but dont pay any tax in this country, as theyre not a taxi service, just a phone app! The buck stops at the conservative ex pm david cameron, his chancellor george, and to some extent foreign secretary boris bunter, although he was more roped in but didnt have the bottle to do the right thing,anyway, long as people are happy to use there tax hard earned money to prop up a multi billion pound company from overseas, its all good!
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Corbyn seems to have gone down quite well at Glasto.
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Corbyn seems to have gone down quite well at Glasto. Nice shirt...it has to be said.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
We would all be living in tents permanently if that Marxist f***wit gets anywhere to being in charge ,
|
|
|
'Jeremania hits Glastonbury' Good on you Jeremy Corbyn.
|
|
|
Originally posted by simlaboy
We would all be living in tents permanently if that Marxist f***wit gets anywhere to being in charge ,
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Pissed stained old tramp preaching to kids in a field , are Operation Yewtree aware ?
|
|
|
Originally posted by simlaboy
We would all be living in tents permanently if that Marxist f***wit gets anywhere to being in charge , A fair day's pay for a fair days work, affordable housing and job security are not that left wing and are pretty much center ground politics outside of the Sun and the Daily Mail. The corporate tax level he proposed was lower than Thatcher had in place. I have read Marx and he makes good points about the problems of Capitalism but I don't share his faith in the dictatorship of the Proletariat. But I certainly think that considering we are the sixth richest country in the world our current model of Capitalism is crap - unless you are rich. It the system that just keeps giving if you are rich. JC is spot on and that is why he is getting so much support despite the bias press coverage. To say Corbyn is a Marxist shows that you are better at echoing cliches than you are at getting your head around political ideas.
|
|
| pefwin |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by simlaboy
No cliches , I don't read any papers and haven't done for years , I have my own opinion , to me he is a career politician totally out of his depth,thrust into the spotlight with McCluskeys hand up his arse , and I didn't vote Tory either So what is your take on Marx?
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Bert the Head
A fair day's pay for a fair days work, affordable housing and job security are not that left wing and are pretty much center ground politics outside of the Sun and the Daily Mail. The corporate tax level he proposed was lower than Thatcher had in place. I have read Marx and he makes good points about the problems of Capitalism but I don't share his faith in the dictatorship of the Proletariat. But I certainly think that considering we are the sixth richest country in the world our current model of Capitalism is crap - unless you are rich. It the system that just keeps giving if you are rich. JC is spot on and that is why he is getting so much support despite the bias press coverage. To say Corbyn is a Marxist shows that you are better at echoing cliches than you are at getting your head around political ideas. Marxism v Capitalism. Take two examples: Germany and Korea were both divided into a marxist and a capitalist half. As time went by, the differences in the economic conditions of the poor in both countries became stark. On the marxist side of Korea there has been mass starvation, the capitalist side prospered. On the marxist side of Germany, the average wage was lower than unemployment benefit on the capitalist side, the capitalist side prospered and a wall was built to stop people escaping from the marxist side. After the world's two most populous countries, China and India, permitted more capitalism in their countries, their economic performance suddenly surged. In every single country that has tried marxism, political oppression has taken place. People have been killed and imprisoned without trial. In the Soviet Union, China and Cambodia, millions died in the marxist holocaust. Political oppression has occurred in every single marxist country. [some of this paraphrased from an article in the Spectator]
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.