This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
You'd rather their pay was unfair? What is unfair pay?
|
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Public sector pay down way below private increases since 2010. What's wrong with a fair pay rise? Edited by CambridgeEagle (28 Jun 2017 7.42pm) Really,well since I gave up cab driving I have worked driving a lorry for the past 7 years....i have not had one increase in pay
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
|
Originally posted by elgrande
Really,well since I gave up cab driving I have worked driving a lorry for the past 7 years....i have not had one increase in pay Based on national stats yes really. But you're not wrong that this government's actions have led to declining real wages across the board not just in the public sector. You should be angry about that.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
What is unfair pay?
So yes then. You would rather it was unfair.
|
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Based on national stats yes really. But you're not wrong that this government's actions have led to declining real wages across the board not just in the public sector. You should be angry about that. I am not particularly angry no,I do think nurses,and emergency services deserve more pay of course I do. Doesn't mean all public sector workers should get more.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
So yes then. You would rather it was unfair. Don't embarrass yourself. What is unfair pay? Do tell, genius?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Don't embarrass yourself. What is unfair pay? Do tell, genius? Pay below that deemed commensurate with their jobs and costs of living as determined by independent public sector pay body. Which the current policy is and consistently had been.
|
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Pay below that deemed commensurate with their jobs and costs of living as determined by independent public sector pay body. Which the current policy is and consistently had been. And you think that everyone else thinks their pay is 'fair' do you? You Labour minions on here are becoming really tedious.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
And you think that everyone else thinks their pay is 'fair' do you? You Labour minions on here are becoming really tedious. I would argue that if any employer had imposed an arbitrary pay cap on its employees for the last 7 years for simply ideological reasons it would be unfair yes. You'd argue for inflicting the population with ebola for not other reason than labour were against it and the Tories were for it. If the government had backed the amendment I'd be applauding them and I hope you would too.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Just give them their raise. Simples. Why shouldn't everybody get a raise now and then. Not having their wage increases has done no good to the economy anyway. For MP's to turn them down you have to be kidding. Nobody has any time for them anymore. MPs have had increases from £65k in 2011 to £76k this year. No pay cap for them! Good on 'em. Plus they can still benefit from lucrative second jobs etc!
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
And you think that everyone else thinks their pay is 'fair' do you? You Labour minions on here are becoming really tedious. I'm assuming you've retired early and aren't doing too bad. Fair play and good luck to you. I sometimes wonder if you ever put yourself in the shoes of those that are struggling in society through no fault of their own and think about what day to day life is like for them.
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
I'm assuming you've retired early and aren't doing too bad. Fair play and good luck to you. I sometimes wonder if you ever put yourself in the shoes of those that are struggling in society through no fault of their own and think about what day to day life is like for them. Who is struggling exactly? What are those public sector workers earning right now?
|
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
I would argue that if any employer had imposed an arbitrary pay cap on its employees for the last 7 years for simply ideological reasons it would be unfair yes. You'd argue for inflicting the population with ebola for not other reason than labour were against it and the Tories were for it. If the government had backed the amendment I'd be applauding them and I hope you would too. Ideological reasons? Economic reasons more likely.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Who is struggling exactly? What are those public sector workers earning right now? My other half is a primary school teacher. She commutes over an hour to school for a half 7 am start and usually gets home about half 7 in the evening. All for less than £30k a year. She has to put in a damn sight more hours than me and earns considerably less. It's only through being a relationship she can afford to do what she could do; being single would be impossible (the only reason she's still with me obvs). The fact that she's now been consigned to an annual 1% pay rise set against ever increasing inflation really is disgraceful. Teachers, doctors, nurses, policeman, fireman etc. do what they do for the love, not the money. It's a vocation and they genuinely want to help people and better others' lives. Something that is foreign to a lot of people on here.
|
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
My other half is a primary school teacher. She commutes over an hour to school for a half 7 am start and usually gets home about half 7 in the evening. All for less than £30k a year. She has to put in a damn sight more hours than me and earns considerably less. It's only through being a relationship she can afford to do what she could do; being single would be impossible (the only reason she's still with me obvs). The fact that she's now been consigned to an annual 1% pay rise set against ever increasing inflation really is disgraceful. Teachers, doctors, nurses, policeman, fireman etc. do what they do for the love, not the money. It's a vocation and they genuinely want to help people and better others' lives. Something that is foreign to a lot of people on here. In which case what they earn should be secondary to them.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Ideological reasons? Economic reasons more likely. No. Austerity has been an ideological choice. It's very poor economics. It's damaging. One of many many many articles and studies on the matter.
|
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
No. Austerity has been an ideological choice. It's very poor economics. It's damaging. One of many many many articles and studies on the matter. So you have told us 1000 times. It wouldn't be because you are a Labour activist by any chance?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
In which case what they earn should be secondary to them. It is. But what they do is also essential to society. We literally couldn't function as a society without them. They are paid far less than what they are worth.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.