You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Jeremy Corbyn
November 9 2026 4.58pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Jeremy Corbyn


Page 267 of 279 < 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 >
Matov Flag 15 Apr 20 4.46pm

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Basically tried to appease the Leavers and the Remainers amongst their own party - leaving a very incoherent policy

But the policy was electoral suicide. Achieved nothing when put to the ultimate electoral test. With all the facts there. Already in votes case in 2016 and 2019.

The task for Labour was not a complex one in what it needed to do. Win a majority of seats in England and Wales. That was it. And by no longer offering to honour the 2016 result, then guaranteeing you could not achieve that.

Also, as I grasp the nature of these revelations, a significant amount of the 'worst' culprits from 2017 in terms of the Labour hierarchy who apparently did their best to try and ensure that Labour did not win went on to have roles in the Peoples Vote campaign.

Forget 52-48 as the percentages of the referendum. When broken down on a constituency basis it was nearer to 65-35. Meaning that adopting a policy of not honouring that was not only shockingly bad but actually negligent if you want your party to win an election.

And these are people who live and breathe this stuff 24/7. Who know the insides and outs of it all. Professionals. Paid, supposedly, to ensure their chosen party does well.

Leaving you with two options about Starmer who was the chief proponent of Labours change of stance over Brexit.

1. Starmer is a fool.
2. Starmer deliberately sought to stop Labour winning in 2019.


If there is a third option then please let me know.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 15 Apr 20 4.58pm

Originally posted by Matov

But the policy was electoral suicide. Achieved nothing when put to the ultimate electoral test. With all the facts there. Already in votes case in 2016 and 2019.

The task for Labour was not a complex one in what it needed to do. Win a majority of seats in England and Wales. That was it. And by no longer offering to honour the 2016 result, then guaranteeing you could not achieve that.

Also, as I grasp the nature of these revelations, a significant amount of the 'worst' culprits from 2017 in terms of the Labour hierarchy who apparently did their best to try and ensure that Labour did not win went on to have roles in the Peoples Vote campaign.

Forget 52-48 as the percentages of the referendum. When broken down on a constituency basis it was nearer to 65-35. Meaning that adopting a policy of not honouring that was not only shockingly bad but actually negligent if you want your party to win an election.

And these are people who live and breathe this stuff 24/7. Who know the insides and outs of it all. Professionals. Paid, supposedly, to ensure their chosen party does well.

Leaving you with two options about Starmer who was the chief proponent of Labours change of stance over Brexit.

1. Starmer is a fool.
2. Starmer deliberately sought to stop Labour winning in 2019.


If there is a third option then please let me know.

There is a third option, one that often pops up in Ireland.
How about if Labour knew they would be divided if they won? Add that to likely not having the money to deliver electoral promises, perhaps also uncertainty caused by Brexit? Then Labour people such as Starmer - perhaps even Corbyn himself - decided this term of government was a poison chalice that would make Labour even weaker than they already were: possibly even destroy Labour and turn them into the new Liberals?
Many Labour delegates may also have considered it likely that Boris would drop some kind of clanger (hardly the biggest stretch of the imagination) and they could look all responsible and alluring in opposition. They might have figured next election could see them make major gains - even win.
Or perhaps they haven't read 'The Prince' or 'The Art of War'? Or maybe I'm crediting politicians with brains they are unlikely to possess?

 


Red and Blue Army!

cryrst Flag The garden of England 15 Apr 20 5.33pm

A 4th option is that corbyn didnt want to sack abbott so losing was less painful. Skeletons in the cupboard maybe.

 

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 22 Jul 20 11.29am

Labour Party settles anti-Semitism row by apologising in court.

[Link]

It seems Starmer is continuing his clear out of the "nasty party members". By all accounts the Corbyn club are furious that he has settled.

 


One more point

Matov Flag 22 Jul 20 1.33pm

Originally posted by Badger11

Labour Party settles anti-Semitism row by apologising in court.

[Link]

It seems Starmer is continuing his clear out of the "nasty party members". By all accounts the Corbyn club are furious that he has settled.

They are furious because they would have won the case. This is insanity. Why on earth would a political party throw in the towel on a case they were likely to win?

Labour under Starmer are doing more to convince me of the idea of a 'hidden hand' in British politics than anything else I have ever lived through.

People need to put aside Left or Right here. And ask 'why'?

This is truly f***ed up.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 22 Jul 20 1.41pm

Originally posted by Matov

They are furious because they would have won the case. This is insanity. Why on earth would a political party throw in the towel on a case they were likely to win?

Labour under Starmer are doing more to convince me of the idea of a 'hidden hand' in British politics than anything else I have ever lived through.

People need to put aside Left or Right here. And ask 'why'?

This is truly f***ed up.

Why do you think they would win? This court case is more about them scapegoating whistle blowers and various senior Labour leaders trying to assassinate their characters and motives.

It's make sense to me that Starmer wants to put this to bed the Human rights commission will find Labour guilty I am fairly sure of that so he is just putting this to bed.

Edited by Badger11 (22 Jul 2020 1.42pm)

 


One more point

Matov Flag 22 Jul 20 1.47pm

Originally posted by Badger11

Why do you think they would win? This court case is more about them scapegoating whistle blowers and various senior Labour leaders trying to assassinate their characters and motives.


Edited by Badger11 (22 Jul 2020 1.42pm)

Look below the surface. Look beyond the usual slings and arrows. My understanding is that Labours own lawyers were telling them that they stood a real chance of winning this case. There is a lot more going on here than initially meets the eye.

Why on earth would you throw in a winning hand?

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 22 Jul 20 1.53pm

Originally posted by Matov

Look below the surface. Look beyond the usual slings and arrows. My understanding is that Labours own lawyers were telling them that they stood a real chance of winning this case. There is a lot more going on here than initially meets the eye.

Why on earth would you throw in a winning hand?

Okay but that is just your opinion based on what? Corbyn supporters will say that so maybe that is where the noise is coming from.

I think the answer is more like I said. Starmer wants to put this whole thing to bed there are various strands and when Labour are find guilty of Anti-Semitism (an assumption I know) all hell will break loose. So rather than drag it on he wants it over asap.

 


One more point

Matov Flag 22 Jul 20 2.44pm

Originally posted by Badger11

Okay but that is just your opinion based on what? Corbyn supporters will say that so maybe that is where the noise is coming from.

Thats a valid question. The only answer I can give you is that by the response from the parties involved, it 'stinks'. Only way to describe it.

If you are sad enough to follow this stuff closely you get a feel for it. Bloody daft when I write it down like this and feel free to mock but this goes beyond the usual games. From various accounts I follow and the like, this is not the usual BS.

This f***ed up. It really is. I openly admit to a real paranoia about Starmer. I see him as far more sinister that Corbyn ever was, absolutely convinced he was a leading party in deliberately engineering Labours defeat in December.

And now throwing in the towel on a court case the party he is leading stood a very good chance of winning, going by what is being said?

If Starmer is Labours solution then so far he has cost them an election and now gives in on court cases they can win.

Something ain't right.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 22 Jul 20 4.00pm

Originally posted by Matov

Thats a valid question. The only answer I can give you is that by the response from the parties involved, it 'stinks'. Only way to describe it.

If you are sad enough to follow this stuff closely you get a feel for it. Bloody daft when I write it down like this and feel free to mock but this goes beyond the usual games. From various accounts I follow and the like, this is not the usual BS.

This f***ed up. It really is. I openly admit to a real paranoia about Starmer. I see him as far more sinister that Corbyn ever was, absolutely convinced he was a leading party in deliberately engineering Labours defeat in December.

And now throwing in the towel on a court case the party he is leading stood a very good chance of winning, going by what is being said?

If Starmer is Labours solution then so far he has cost them an election and now gives in on court cases they can win.

Something ain't right.

I think you have a point about Starmer wanting Corbyn to fail he wasn't the only one. But with regards to the court case some pretty nasty things were said about the whistleblowers which was completely unprofessional. Labour may have won it's case but it would have been a
Pyrrhic victory.

Anyway we shall see no doubt more stuff will leak out.

 


One more point

eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 22 Jul 20 4.31pm

Originally posted by Badger11

I think you have a point about Starmer wanting Corbyn to fail he wasn't the only one. But with regards to the court case some pretty nasty things were said about the whistleblowers which was completely unprofessional. Labour may have won it's case but it would have been a
Pyrrhic victory.

Anyway we shall see no doubt more stuff will leak out.

Not with the Biased Bullshyte Co you wont, they will suppress it, hide it, accidently fail to report it. They will continue their rhetoric & demand 'everyone' pays for their huge obscene wages so they can *ahem* entertain, inform & educate the population to their wants.

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 22 Jul 20 4.52pm

Hopefully this will not be the end of matters with labour MPs without an anti-semitic bone in their bodies careers and reputations damaged.

Starmer is a nasty piece of work.

 

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 22 Jul 20 4.55pm

Originally posted by eagleman13

Not with the Biased Bullshyte Co you wont, they will suppress it, hide it, accidently fail to report it. They will continue their rhetoric & demand 'everyone' pays for their huge obscene wages so they can *ahem* entertain, inform & educate the population to their wants.

When you earn £190,000 pa of course it's good value for money.

 


One more point

Matov Flag 22 Jul 20 8.45pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Starmer is a nasty piece of work.


Perhaps the most sinister politician in British politics since Mandleson. And a much better actor. That is what makes him so dangerous. It is how he can present himself as this rather nice middle class chap. Even a 'Sir'. On the side of all reasonable people. But the stunts he has pulled, against his own party, are eye watering in terms of their treachery.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 22 Jul 20 9.59pm

Originally posted by Matov


Perhaps the most sinister politician in British politics since Mandleson. And a much better actor. That is what makes him so dangerous. It is how he can present himself as this rather nice middle class chap. Even a 'Sir'. On the side of all reasonable people. But the stunts he has pulled, against his own party, are eye watering in terms of their treachery.

Great choice we have, the Prince Regent or Uriah Heap.


 

Matov Flag 22 Jul 20 10.34pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Great choice we have, the Prince Regent or Uriah Heap.



We live in quite incredible times really. But we all have to accept our share of responsibility. We all play the game, we all take our own side and ignore the downsides of the rest.

And whilst I don't mean this as a personal slur, how many of the Left cheered Starmer on when he pushed for this second referendum? It was utter insanity on any kind of reasoned or rational understanding of British electoral politics. A complete no-go given how England and Wales were staunchly behind voting Leave. An absolute guaranteed way of ensuring that Labour lost and lost badly.

Yet many of you cheered it on. Wanted nothing more than the biggest electoral exercise in British history cast aside and were willing to blindly follow behind despite the glaring evidence of just how stupid the position was.

Now I can accept that I voted for that utter moron Johnson solely on the Brexit issue but for the life of me, I cannot truly fathom why so many people fell for Starmers second referendum BS, especially when the evidence of it being utterly without hope of ever coming to fruition was in plain sight.

Leaving us with this. They say we get the politicians we deserve and never has that been so true.


Edited by Matov (22 Jul 2020 10.36pm)

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 23 Jul 20 9.12am

Response from the BBC journalist to the idea that Labour had a good case and it was a political decision by Starmer to surrender.


[Link]

Corbyn supporters will disagree of course but it goes to my argument that this case was about how people within the Labour party libelled these 7 individuals rather than is the Labour party anti-Semitic.

 


One more point

Matov Flag 23 Jul 20 9.37am

Originally posted by Badger11

Response from the BBC journalist to the idea that Labour had a good case and it was a political decision by Starmer to surrender.


[Link]

Corbyn supporters will disagree of course but it goes to my argument that this case was about how people within the Labour party libelled these 7 individuals rather than is the Labour party anti-Semitic.

The BBC is in play now. Defunding it could well be a major manfiesto pledge in 2024 from the Tory side. Starmer is its only real hope of maintaining the status quo.

Hence why it will now go to bat fully on Starmers side. Labour could have won that case. That is the point. It utterly capitulated because it wanted to lose. It wants the guilt by way of tainting the left.

I am no Corbyn supporter. His brand, and support, from the left are the very anthisis of what I believe and stand for but Starmer represents a much wider and deeper threat. Corbyn, for all his many faults, is a man I believe genuinely values democracy. Believes in the notion of one man, one vote.

Where as Starmer patently does not. Only in power. And was willing to sacrfice is own party to achieve that. A man who cannot be trusted, who has not principles and no wider loyaltys other than to himself. A

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 23 Jul 20 9.46am

Originally posted by Matov

The BBC is in play now. Defunding it could well be a major manfiesto pledge in 2024 from the Tory side. Starmer is its only real hope of maintaining the status quo.

Hence why it will now go to bat fully on Starmers side. Labour could have won that case. That is the point. It utterly capitulated because it wanted to lose. It wants the guilt by way of tainting the left.

I am no Corbyn supporter. His brand, and support, from the left are the very anthisis of what I believe and stand for but Starmer represents a much wider and deeper threat. Corbyn, for all his many faults, is a man I believe genuinely values democracy. Believes in the notion of one man, one vote.

Where as Starmer patently does not. Only in power. And was willing to sacrfice is own party to achieve that. A man who cannot be trusted, who has not principles and no wider loyaltys other than to himself. A

I enjoy your posts Matov. I hadn't thought about the BBC angle it wouldn't surprise me the BBC needs all the allies it can get.

 


One more point

Matov Flag 23 Jul 20 1.07pm

Originally posted by Badger11

...the BBC needs all the allies it can get.

It is s*** or bust time for it. Its funding model is simply no longer justifiable and as for the salaries it pays people, then beyond belief really.

There is probably a role for it still at the upper end of the market but that could be funded by subscriptions, adverts and some limited Government funding for some of its news and current affairs output.

But in terms of competing with the major commerical channels for mass audiences, then its time has come and gone. When people had limited options in terms of what they could watch it could be justified and even when it at least adhered to the basic principles of fairness, then fine but now? After Brexit and its disgraceful coverage of it all?

No. Dead in the water. And a manifesto goal for the Tories. Has to be. Will force Labour into a kind of Brexit quandry again. Membership will be vehmently in support of keeping the licence fee, the votes it needs to challenge the Tories amongst people who would happily see the back of the liceence fee for ever.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Page 267 of 279 < 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Jeremy Corbyn