This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Corbyn is just not worth any discussion anymore, he's like a cold war relic from the 60s. He's rusting away in a dry docks right now. It's his legacy that worries me. He and his friends have managed to infiltrate the Labour party from grass roots all the way up, Starmer has a job on his hands to bring Labour back to the centre ground. Edited by Badger11 (23 Jul 2020 2.31pm)
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
It's his legacy that worries me. He and his friends have managed to infiltrate the Labour party from grass roots all the way up, Starmer has a job on his hands to bring Labour back to the centre ground. Edited by Badger11 (23 Jul 2020 2.31pm) You mean the tory centre ground. No thanks. Socialist measures are being used with some success, and otherwise where would we be.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
You mean the tory centre ground. No thanks. Socialist measures are being used with some success, and otherwise where would we be.
Quasi-socialist measures, implemented by a sensible, centrist government. As opposed to socialist measures implemented by Marxist lunatics. Big difference.
|
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Corbyn is just not worth any discussion anymore, he's like a cold war relic from the 60s. He's rusting away in a dry docks right now.
I loved Labour losing in 2019 but it was the biggest act of self-harm ever seen in British politics. Beyond stupidity. Why? And now this? The role of the offical opposition is an important one in how Britain functions. The leader of that opposition matters in the wider context of the UK. The focus now has to be on Starmer. Because he is a wrong'un. A 100% bought and paid for stooge.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
You mean the tory centre ground. No thanks. Socialist measures are being used with some success, and otherwise where would we be.
Thank god they only stay in place during a pandemic we would be f***ed of we done it in normal time.
|
|
|
I'd like to see the nasty old man chucked out of the Labour Party. He'd be much happier on the outside firing in and he can sit around chatting with his mates in Hamas to his heart's content. From there he can slowly decline into rabid senility and sprout his antisemitism all day long. The damage Corbyn and his like have to Labour is enormous. Originally posted by Badger11
Bump. The EHRC Report on Anti Semitism in the Labour Party is due out on Thursday. It will be interesting to see if they find Labour guilty and name names and if Corbyn gets any blame. From that Tory loving rag The Guardian
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by buzby1
I'd like to see the nasty old man chucked out of the Labour Party. He'd be much happier on the outside firing in and he can sit around chatting with his mates in Hamas to his heart's content. From there he can slowly decline into rabid senility and sprout his antisemitism all day long. The damage Corbyn and his like have to Labour is enormous. Quite possibly the last potential prime minister in our lifetimes with a principled mission in politics beyond self-gain.
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
Quite a dull report in the end, which isn't surprising given it comes from a very dull organisation. It got the headline in terms of interference in the complaints process, but the detailing means any legal challenge to someone significant won't stick. Its conclusion was also a dampener for the more zealous right wingers who wanted Corbyn et al expelled. Starmer said he'd act on all recommendations, and in the end he's probably relieved that they are pretty minor and unlikely to enflame the factional warfare. He can make a boring speech about detail which is his favourite thing to do and move on. Hard to disagree with much of that. It was always a bit of damp squib really in that when push comes to shove the attempts to equate anti-semitism with criticism of Isrealis policies falls down pretty much at the first corner of any kind of rigourous examination. Which ultimately is really the crux of it all. But lets be honest, a significant proportion of the Left feel Israel should not exist in the first place. Which is a lot more dubious.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
|
Originally posted by Matov
Hard to disagree with much of that. It was always a bit of damp squib really in that when push comes to shove the attempts to equate anti-semitism with criticism of Isrealis policies falls down pretty much at the first corner of any kind of rigourous examination. Which ultimately is really the crux of it all. But lets be honest, a significant proportion of the Left feel Israel should not exist in the first place. Which is a lot more dubious. Not sure about that. Maybe a few, but I think a lot of pro-Palestinian activists who properly engage with the issue would like a return to pre-67 boundaries. That Israel have consistently flouted international law by expanding their territory and never really faced sanctions undermines the very idea of borders around the world. A final note on this most tedious of subjects. I find it very revealing that the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism have submitted formal complaints against MPs. Firstly, the report doesn't actually name individual MPs as being culpable. You could argue that it names the Leader of the Opposition's Office and so indirectly Corbyn, but they've gone after Dianne Abbott as well. Now don't get me wrong, she has many faults. But what role has she played in anti-semitism? She isn't mentioned at all in the report. I doubt she even knows what it is FFS. Really confirms my suspicion that they were never that interested in what this report had to say, and just wanted to use it as a battering ram against their political opponents.
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
Now don't get me wrong, she has many faults. But what role has she played in anti-semitism? She isn't mentioned at all in the report. I doubt she even knows what it is FFS. Really confirms my suspicion that they were never that interested in what this report had to say, and just wanted to use it as a battering ram against their political opponents. And Starmer was at the top table. His influence was plain to see given that he led the charge for the insane second referendum policy that done Labours legs. Starmer was a MAJOR player in the Corbyn leadership. And yet appears to be getting off with not even a tap on the wrists. Now you now my stance on Starmer being a fully paid up stooge but how he seems to be swerving any of the blame for this is beyond me.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
JC has rejected the conclusions of a report on antisemitism in Labour, saying the extent of the problem was “dramatically overstated for political reasons” by opponents and the media, and that this harmed Jewish people. This is just a few rotten eggs and JC was slow as he has accepted. There is no history of anti-semitism in the labour party, quite the reverse.
Typical of that virtue signalling momentum lot. So full of their own bulls*** they refuse to acknowledge they have any flaws. JC started his statement "Antisemitism is abhorrent", using inflated adjectives to try and display false sincerity from the man who called Hamas and Hezbollah his friends. Corbyn has taken no responsibility to any defeat he or the Labour Party have suffered at the polling booth. Sadly, I think it will be very difficult to expel him as his supporters are excellent at playing the victim.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
JC has rejected the conclusions of a report on antisemitism in Labour, saying the extent of the problem was “dramatically overstated for political reasons” by opponents and the media, and that this harmed Jewish people. This is just a few rotten eggs and JC was slow as he has accepted. There is no history of anti-semitism in the labour party, quite the reverse.
That’ll comfort JC during his suspension.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
That’ll comfort JC during his suspension. He's not worried it will take them 3 years to investigate and then find him not guilty.
One more point |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.