This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by essetwentyone
The worst thing about today’s defeat is that once again we were so boring ! Roy’s tactics bore the pants off me and he is so predictable- sub brought on today after 63 minutes - again !!!!! When things weren't working Roy should have tried changing the formation slightly in the 2nd half by putting Zaha on the wings and Meyer centrally. He should have taken off Benteke and brough in Ayew early.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Tickled pink
Sheff.U only had one other real chance and that was given to them by van Aanholt losing possession in a ridiculous place so for all their hard pressing our defence was solid in actual defending with great blocks and bodies in the way when you actually think about it. Far too optimistic a reading. We did not have a single clear chance and only a few openings. They had far more of both. The start of the second half was especially depressing. I was waiting for us to up the intensity and put SU on the back foot. That is precisely what they did to us. After that we had no attacking ideas beyond hoof it to Tekkers, or give it to Wilf or Andros and see what they could do. With nil result.
The right place at the right time |
|
|
Originally posted by davehuggins
All great ideas, change this change that but RH is a very experienced manager. The board have NOT backed him in any shape or form during his tenure. SP and the owners are and will carry on taking us downward until RH gets the backing he needs. Tekkers was not his idea so IMO back RH or we have to accept the inevitable. What you say is true but if Roy won’t make best use of what he has then.... I guess we’ll find out soon. I’m not saying you’re wrong, but we’re not going to suddenly get players in now, unless a decent scorer come in on loan, but as someone else said, Parish isn’t going before Roy and I doubt Freedman will either. It’s not Roy’s fault but he’s not making it any better for himself. Edited by Rudi Hedman (19 Aug 2019 10.02am)
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Lyons550
The issues are two fold....lack of investment and poor transfer policy. The yanks are causing massive unrest at the minute wanting out and witholding much needed investment as a result. That means any money we get in is either being used to pay down debts or to line their pockets before they feck off. As for transfers...we made two GOOD acquisitions in Cahill and Camarassa...so why aren't we playing them. However in general our transfer policy is awful...we should be bringing in players to cover for those being sold...we knew either AWB or WIlf was going as did the club...so why not get on with this? The reason being that we needed the money to come in BEFORE we could then afford to buy anyone..getting stripped for the price in the process. Again this is down to the Yanks not paying their way...it all comes back to them. The sooner we have new investors come in the better...problem is would they be any better? Lyons is right. But if we get relegated their original investment will evaporate and be worth half or even less. As it stands they must be around break even if most of the AWB money has been used to pay off director loans. Or the director loans can now be paid off when cash flow allows it more now following the AWB sale. Unless the relegation loss maybe less or more likely not that much more than propping the squad up with loaned funds again in January. I think the US investors weren’t expecting this need for squad investment and with the mistakes by Parish and emergency repairs it’s been a problem we’re stuck with since one or two or theee big repair jobs that have caught up with us, or Parish to be precise.
COYP |
|
|
Durham on Talksport before the season started tipped us to go down and this game as a 6 pointer. I laughed at both but he was probably right
|
|
|
Originally posted by Lyons550
The issues are two fold....lack of investment and poor transfer policy. The yanks are causing massive unrest at the minute wanting out and witholding much needed investment as a result. That means any money we get in is either being used to pay down debts or to line their pockets before they feck off. As for transfers...we made two GOOD acquisitions in Cahill and Camarassa...so why aren't we playing them. However in general our transfer policy is awful...we should be bringing in players to cover for those being sold...we knew either AWB or WIlf was going as did the club...so why not get on with this? The reason being that we needed the money to come in BEFORE we could then afford to buy anyone..getting stripped for the price in the process. Again this is down to the Yanks not paying their way...it all comes back to them. The sooner we have new investors come in the better...problem is would they be any better? It appears American investors in Premier clubs expect a return on their money, they don’t go in for pumping loads of cash in to raise their profile as Russians and Middle East owners. Calls for new owners is just desperation on our part, a number of clubs have been sold over the last 15 years with varying degrees of success and failure. There is no guarantee any new owner is just going to throw cash in and get nothing back, they are businessmen not fools. As an investment we don’t look very attractive, the ground is the main issue, which Parish is trying to correct, but finding it difficult to get past CROYDON Council, Sainsbury’s and the Mayor of London. There is no easy solution.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Painter
It appears American investors in Premier clubs expect a return on their money, they don’t go in for pumping loads of cash in to raise their profile as Russians and Middle East owners. Calls for new owners is just desperation on our part, a number of clubs have been sold over the last 15 years with varying degrees of success and failure. There is no guarantee any new owner is just going to throw cash in and get nothing back, they are businessmen not fools. As an investment we don’t look very attractive, the ground is the main issue, which Parish is trying to correct, but finding it difficult to get past CROYDON Council, Sainsbury’s and the Mayor of London. There is no easy solution. I agree with most of what you say...except that if the investors were either Chinese or Saudi...then its a 'toy' and not so much of a business. Whether 'desperation' or not, ownership is clearly an issue that needs to be resolved...and soon. Those that aren't 'desperate' to see this change are quite probably relaxed about survival regardless of what has been served up in the last 2 games. If that is indeed the case then i'm not quite sure as to what they're seeing that the majority aren't (?)
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
|
Originally posted by thosewerethedays
Indeed they do! LM just afte signing a new deal should be leading and bollocking as a captain. I am hoping he isnt just comfortable now?! I can take a loss on the chin, I can't accept a gutless performance. This team needs a rocket up it and several hairdryers thrown at them. agree entirely, but it was a general malaise, no individual could be picked out although Luka dropped off his marker for their goal - the squad needs big changes, i.e. Wilf has to go - it's not really Parish's fault that he never got a suitable offer - I thought at least one top club wud bid 80mil, but we have an unbalanced squad and the players know this, the progress towards making us a comfortable rather than uncomfortable mid-table side has stalled and gone backwards, hopefully McCarthy and Camarasa can get some attacking drive going and we put Tompkins at right back and drop Ward who was awful yesterday, those aimless crosses from the deep!!! Roy needs to come up with one of his plans - Zaha and Andros as a front two two seasons back, Schlupp and McArthur (past sell by date now) as inside forwards in front of Luka last season, some new system with the new personnel will see some improvement, but failures in the summer window have made finding an effective tactical set-up much harder, that's the root of the problem, that's what's sapping the players' belief and motivation. We have to prepare for life after Zexit!
|
|
|
Originally posted by Gary St.Andrews
Our deliveries were very poor into the box, and why Townsend has to keep cutting in onto his left boot Christ knows. I want to see him get to the byline and cross it so Tekkers can attack it. We seem to complicate matters so much, and I’m sad to say it but Jimmy Mac is past it... Because he is left footed and playing on the right? Maybe we should think about playing Townsend on the left Wilf on the right and actually give Benteke a chance of scoring by crossing the ball.
|
|
|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
Not from benteke. Get Wickham and Eyew up front with Zaha and Townsend supplying them. Regards to benteke you can't keep doing the same thing and expect a different outcome anymore. Edited by dannyboy1978 (19 Aug 2019 7.32am) I don't know about Eyew may be we should try Eeyore up front......hold on ...wait a minute we already have a donkey there already.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.