This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Olise transfer speculation
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
 Spiderman  Horsham 29 Jun 24 12.37pm |
|
Originally posted by palace99
if he is having a medical surely everything must be agreed between us and BM.
I do wonder if the release price comments are a few weeks old and surely have been resolved.
Not sure medical has taken place yet
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 29 Jun 24 12.47pm |
|
|
My take is that the fee is not the issue but the payment schedule is.
It seems like we have told Bayern he's all yours now where's the £50m* and Bayern are bulking at paying all at once which no doubt will impact any other signings they are planning.
Under the circumstances I think we are entitled to demand full payment which perhaps is why Chelsea dropped out.
*We may be using this argument to get Bayern to stump up more e.g. £50m now or say £60m if you want to spread it over several years.
Edited by Badger11 (29 Jun 2024 12.49pm)
One more point
|
Teddy Eagle  29 Jun 24 1.00pm |
|
Originally posted by JRW2
Yes, I can't exactly see Michael going around wearing lederhosen
and a big grin, with a litre of beer in his hand.
For a reasonable wage I could handle that for him. Apart from the lederhosen and grinning obviously.
|
Henry of Peckham  Eton Mess 29 Jun 24 1.11pm |
|
Originally posted by JRW2
Yes, I can't exactly see Michael going around wearing lederhosen
and a big grin, with a litre of beer in his hand.
... However, he may yet trip over his fat wallet and be out for half of next season.
I wonder why Chelsea supposedly baulked at the cost of signing him? They are always asking silly money for their players.
Denial is not just a river in Egypt
|
| Putitout Oxford 29 Jun 24 2.53pm |
|
|
It’s impossible to know what’s true in this Olise saga,after all it’s only ever been click bait prompting click bait. In variably the player , who is under contract , has agreed terms, tapped up then. This unsettles not just the player but often others in the club. The bigger problem being it’s not always true , take last year Olise , agreed terms with Chelsea, no he didn’t. It’s easy to know virtually every wealthy club would fancy Olise.hence the click bait. My feeling is that in this case all the Premier sides backed away at the cost ,leaving Bayern thinking they can fiddle a cheaper than cheap deal, with the click bait brigade taking it for granted deal done. My hope is that Bayern back off, but if not the price paid is substantially higher than any yet mentioned .
|
| Mystic Smeg Here 29 Jun 24 3.09pm |
|
|
Never mind Fabricatezio Romano and all the other click bait mob, wait til the end of the window. As I've said from the start wahen when all these fakes said the deal was done, Michael ain't going to Bayern and he probably knows little about it. There's a deal waiting at Palace and I'll say he'll take it.
Against the disease of writing one must take special precautions, since it is a dangerous and contagious disease
|
CPFC Dartford  Dartford 29 Jun 24 4.18pm |
|
|
I’d walk away right now from negotiations. Imagine if we desperately needed to sell, they could have really stitched us up.
|
| PatrickA London 29 Jun 24 4.20pm |
|
|
He signed a new 4 year deal ten months ago.
He was injured for half of the first season of that term.
Why should he be offered a new contract when he has 3 years remaining and when one concludes he was only too happy to sign up for 4 years less than a year ago?
Let's assume he's offered new terms and signs another contract with Palace and has a brilliant start to the season.
Do we offer him another contract in the New Year when the January window commences?
Surely a line has to be drawn on this saga?
|
| eritheagle Erith 29 Jun 24 4.46pm |
|
Originally posted by Henry of Peckham
... However, he may yet trip over his fat wallet and be out for half of next season.
I wonder why Chelsea supposedly baulked at the cost of signing him? They are always asking silly money for their players.
They're getting Dewsbury-Hall for half the amount now.
|
| RubinsCube Wimbledon 29 Jun 24 8.59pm |
|
Originally posted by PatrickA
He signed a new 4 year deal ten months ago.
He was injured for half of the first season of that term.
Why should he be offered a new contract when he has 3 years remaining and when one concludes he was only too happy to sign up for 4 years less than a year ago?
Let's assume he's offered new terms and signs another contract with Palace and has a brilliant start to the season.
Do we offer him another contract in the New Year when the January window commences?
Surely a line has to be drawn on this saga?
Because the current one contains a release clause criminally below his market value.
|
| PatrickA London 29 Jun 24 9.40pm |
|
|
Well some on here have suggested that Olise was only prepared to sign the contract with a reduced value to ensure that he would be able to move.
That he wouldn't sign a prohibitive clause that would reduce his attraction.
Who knows, but as I have consistently maintained these clauses seem to invariably operate in the interests of the player rather than the club.
Originally posted by RubinsCube
Because the current one contains a release clause criminally below his market value.
|
| DANGERCLOSE London 29 Jun 24 11.47pm |
|
|
It won’t be done until the fee is paid. Steve Parish is not a soft touch.
Nice 1
|
| Gary St.Andrews Kenley 30 Jun 24 8.07am |
|
|
Im sure Man City are waiting in the wings should Bayern take too long and they would have better understanding of how things should be done.
Where does Olise’s agent figure in all this, I bet he is the poison pill knocking about in the background?
|
| YT Oxford 30 Jun 24 9.29am |
|
Originally posted by Gary St.Andrews
Im sure Man City are waiting in the wings should Bayern take too long and they would have better understanding of how things should be done.
Where does Olise’s agent figure in all this, I bet he is the poison pill knocking about in the background?
Why is a player's agent a 'poison pill'? What does that mean?
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 30 Jun 24 9.37am |
|
|
I hope thew reports that Parish is playing hard ball are true. Bayern are supposed to be European royalty not tire kickers like Spurs or Arsenal always looking for a cheap deal.
As much as I hate Moan United when they wanted Zaha and AWB they did not muck about and agreed a fee fairly quickly.
Time for Bayern to put up or shut up.
One more point
|
| esox lucius Deal 30 Jun 24 1.25pm |
|
|
I don’t know what Bayern are moaning about, even at £55m it’s an absolute steal.
|
| Palacesince64 Edinburgh 30 Jun 24 10.33pm |
|
|
Apparently Nico Williams has a £49 million release clause. Take the £50 million for Olise, buy Williams, enough left over for beers all round! 
|
pssguy  30 Jun 24 10.50pm |
|
Originally posted by Palacesince64
Apparently Nico Williams has a £49 million release clause. Take the £50 million for Olise, buy Williams, enough left over for beers all round!
I think the only reason other teams haven't snapped up Williams is that he is looking for 350,000 a week
|
| DANGERCLOSE London 30 Jun 24 11.19pm |
|
|
Nixon is saying
It’s £6.5m difference … if they have the £43m then surely they can find £49.5m
|
taylors lovechild  01 Jul 24 8.22am |
|
|
If there is any confusion you would imagine it's not what they need to pay Palace, but rather what they have to pay Reading and Olise. Possibly the figure is £43 million to Palace, but then say £5 million to Reading and £2 million to Olise's team. It's possibly Palace have said that they won't negotiate on their end, but feel free to speak to Olise.
Pure speculation on my part, but that way it's on Olise and if he's that keen to move he drops his cut of the deal, or takes a lower wage.
|