This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
The old boiling water and sugar punishment comes to mind.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
suicideatselhurst ![]() |
|
---|---|
I used to go out with a wpc who worked on the case when she first went missing, all the local old bill knew it was him (Bellfield), but the detectives on the case were looking at the dad, because of his fetish habits, no doubt at some stage he will confess to certain other murders.
Theres someone in my head ... But its not me X/Box game Tag bazcpfc1961, clan (HMS) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
The sick fvck is at it again [Link] How any solicitor can represent this coward, this evil piece of sh1t, is totally incomprehensible to me? Are they obligated? Jaime has got it in one. Control and attention. Someone in prison please get him. Burn him. But don't kill him. Then blind him. Then castration. Then keep him alive until he is 80. Sh1t in his food. Keep him awake at night. Make him go insane.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
pefwin ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
My grandfather was Governor of Wakefield in the early 1950s. Right tough b'stard he was, too. Never heard of boy butter for the grandkids?
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
I read somewhere a while back that scientists were working on a drug which could be administered to a prisoner, who if for arguments sake sentenced to 800 years prison would really feel they had served 800 years although in reality it would only take a few moments say in the time it took the doctor to have a cup of coffee. *No I am not Jamiemarten 721*
Pro USA & Israel |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
I read somewhere a while back that scientists were working on a drug which could be administered to a prisoner, who if for arguments sake sentenced to 800 years prison would really feel they had served 800 years although in reality it would only take a few moments say in the time it took the doctor to have a cup of coffee. *No I am not Jamiemarten 721* I think they just get them to read the 'Clattenburg' thread.
You fed me, you bred me, I'll remember your name. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
So now saying he didn't confess and now got some - equally publicity hungry - lawyer representing him and demanding that the police reveal their records of his recent interview.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
The sick fvck is at it again [Link] How any solicitor can represent this coward, this evil piece of sh1t, is totally incomprehensible to me? Are they obligated?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by beer man
Neither are.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Exceptions over the death penalty should be made. I believe Bellfield is one. The law should be streamlined in exceptional circumstances, where the doubt is non-existent and the crimes so horrific.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
Neither are. The usual route to a barrister is through a solicitor. Solicitors have good working relationships with barristers and are likely to be able to identify the most suitable barrister to deal with your case. Assuming that the barrister identified is available and that there are no conflicts of interest, they are under a duty to take on your case (under the 'cab rank' rule).
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by beer man
The usual route to a barrister is through a solicitor. Solicitors have good working relationships with barristers and are likely to be able to identify the most suitable barrister to deal with your case. Assuming that the barrister identified is available and that there are no conflicts of interest, they are under a duty to take on your case (under the 'cab rank' rule). But not in practice. If a barrister doesn't want the case, he/she won't take it. Happens a lot.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.