This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This was couple days ago
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Agreed!!
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Townsend is a softie
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
Whatever the reason was... I hope Pardew saw the effect of Townsend's threat to Liverpool's defence compared to CY Lee. Both Ian Wright and Steve McManaman agreed at half time that we lacked a threat on both sides and that Lee should be replaced by Townsend or Puncheon. Klopp must have loved it when he got our team sheet and saw the lineup. Yet again Palace surrender the first half to our opposition. let's hope Pardew can select the best XI to start next week away to Burnley or shall we give them a one goal start too? Pards got tactics totally wrong first half as not having to attacking wingers and dropping deep was perfect for Liverpool. Lee was playing at his best when subbed which is comical. GT
Eagles S*** on Seagulls, Eagles S*** on Seagulls, |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.