Have the Ultras gone too far this time?

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Have the Ultras gone too far this time?

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

chateauferret 16 Dec 17 2.18am
This post has been merged from a topic called 'Is hooliganism coming back?' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Willo I recall once addressing the multitudes at a function and a well-heeled chap congratulated me for my articulation comparing it to the elaborate introductions of acts by Leonard Sachs on the 'Good old days' !!!! I really don't think that I matched that degree of florid terminology nor the protracted words but I could understand why he formed that judgement ! Oh, you "address multitudes" too, do you? Wonders will never cease. WTF were you "addressing multitudes" about, just OOI? ============ The Ferret ============
Alert a moderator to this post

chateauferret

16 Dec 17 2.18am

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Is hooliganism coming back?' by Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by Willo

I recall once addressing the multitudes at a function and a well-heeled chap congratulated me for my articulation comparing it to the elaborate introductions of acts by Leonard Sachs on the 'Good old days' !!!!

I really don't think that I matched that degree of florid terminology nor the protracted words but I could understand why he formed that judgement !

Oh, you "address multitudes" too, do you?

Wonders will never cease.

WTF were you "addressing multitudes" about, just OOI?

============
The Ferret
============

Alert a moderator to this post

chateauferret 16 Dec 17 2.46am
Originally posted by OhthisbloodyPC Some people liked it. You didn't. From what I've already worked out about you, I wouldn't want you to like me. You're a pathetic, weak, illiterate, cowardly creep. If you liked anything I posted, I would have to ask myself where I went wrong. Let's see you put your thoughts up for consideration. Oh not, you won't do that, because you are too afraid to frame any original thoughts. "Illiterate" means unable to read and write. Not liking a particular kind of literature - a description which your OP meets only in the loosest of terms, BTW - is not evidence of illiteracy. I didn't like Animal Farm. Or The Go-between. Or for that matter Gogol's Zapiski sumasshyedshyevo. Does that make me illiterate? And he told you exactly what he thought of your post, which is neither weak nor cowardly. If anything, it's too far the other way. Grow up. Edited by chateauferret (16 Dec 2017 2.49am) ============ The Ferret ============
Alert a moderator to this post

chateauferret

16 Dec 17 2.46am

Originally posted by OhthisbloodyPC

Some people liked it.

You didn't.

From what I've already worked out about you, I wouldn't want you to like me. You're a pathetic, weak, illiterate, cowardly creep.

If you liked anything I posted, I would have to ask myself where I went wrong.

Let's see you put your thoughts up for consideration.

Oh not, you won't do that, because you are too afraid to frame any original thoughts.

"Illiterate" means unable to read and write. Not liking a particular kind of literature - a description which your OP meets only in the loosest of terms, BTW - is not evidence of illiteracy. I didn't like Animal Farm. Or The Go-between. Or for that matter Gogol's Zapiski sumasshyedshyevo. Does that make me illiterate?

And he told you exactly what he thought of your post, which is neither weak nor cowardly. If anything, it's too far the other way.

Grow up.

Edited by chateauferret (16 Dec 2017 2.49am)

============
The Ferret
============

Alert a moderator to this post

the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 16 Dec 17 4.37am
This post has been merged from a topic called 'Is hooliganism coming back?' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Willo It might be rambling like clematis but it really does essay a great well of oratory and the great cacophanous crescendo of punditry brought merriment to my face. Ive got it! You are that bloke who used to present Old Time Music Hall on the Tv, the crap programme my dad used to watch...... oops just read the earlier post Leonard Willo Sachs Edited by the silurian (16 Dec 2017 4.38am)
Alert a moderator to this post

the silurian

The garden of England.(not really) 16 Dec 17 4.37am

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Is hooliganism coming back?' by Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by Willo

It might be rambling like clematis but it really does essay a great well of oratory and the great cacophanous crescendo of punditry brought merriment to my face.

Ive got it! You are that bloke who used to present Old Time Music Hall on the Tv, the crap programme my dad used to watch......
oops just read the earlier post Leonard Willo Sachs

Edited by the silurian (16 Dec 2017 4.38am)

Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle 16 Dec 17 7.06am
Originally posted by OhthisbloodyPC From what I've already worked out about you, I wouldn't want you to like me. You're a pathetic, weak, illiterate, cowardly creep. Zig n Zag is right about your starting more than one thread to post the same text and I have merged them both into one thread. Obviously some people won't find you as amusing as you find yourself but if you use language again like the above you will find a pretty coloured flag next to your name
Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle

16 Dec 17 7.06am

Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by OhthisbloodyPC

From what I've already worked out about you, I wouldn't want you to like me. You're a pathetic, weak, illiterate, cowardly creep.

Zig n Zag is right about your starting more than one thread to post the same text and I have merged them both into one thread.

Obviously some people won't find you as amusing as you find yourself but if you use language again like the above you will find a pretty coloured flag next to your name

Alert a moderator to this post

OhthisbloodyPC 16 Dec 17 9.14am
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle Zig n Zag is right about your starting more than one thread to post the same text and I have merged them both into one thread. Obviously some people won't find you as amusing as you find yourself but if you use language again like the above you will find a pretty coloured flag next to your name Fine. It's your ball and we have to play your way. But just so I understand. It seems to be OK to use words like s* and dickhead, in a very negative post. But words that are generally acceptable in polite society, and on TV, like cowardly and weak, will attract a red flag. Not sure I understand that, but, hey ho. I assume on Palace Talk we must confine ourselves to the usual topics. The Ref robbed us Parish Must Go Sack the manager. Wilf just isn't good enough. I always thought these were a bit narrow. The other thing is the same negativity shown to other posters (s*! Dickhead!) is shown to the players. Partly because the narrow minded posters are now getting encouragement. I bet ZigNZig couldn't trap a ball if you gave him a net, and yet he's exactly the type to come on here endlessly whining about how Ward Or Cabaye or even Wilf are not good enough. The stadium isn't good enough. Steve Parish didn't save the club heroically enough and neglected to include gold taps in the toilets in the Holmesdale end. I find that negativity and narrow mindedness incredibly depressing. It's your web site, obviously, but isn't it possible to widen our horizons a bit? You're acting like a typical Virgo!
Alert a moderator to this post

OhthisbloodyPC

16 Dec 17 9.14am

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Zig n Zag is right about your starting more than one thread to post the same text and I have merged them both into one thread.

Obviously some people won't find you as amusing as you find yourself but if you use language again like the above you will find a pretty coloured flag next to your name

Fine. It's your ball and we have to play your way.

But just so I understand.

It seems to be OK to use words like s*** and dickhead, in a very negative post.

But words that are generally acceptable in polite society, and on TV, like cowardly and weak, will attract a red flag.

Not sure I understand that, but, hey ho.

I assume on Palace Talk we must confine ourselves to the usual topics.

The Ref robbed us
Parish Must Go
Sack the manager.
Wilf just isn't good enough.

I always thought these were a bit narrow.

The other thing is the same negativity shown to other posters (s***! Dickhead!) is shown to the players. Partly because the narrow minded posters are now getting encouragement.

I bet ZigNZig couldn't trap a ball if you gave him a net, and yet he's exactly the type to come on here endlessly whining about how Ward Or Cabaye or even Wilf are not good enough.

The stadium isn't good enough. Steve Parish didn't save the club heroically enough and neglected to include gold taps in the toilets in the Holmesdale end.

I find that negativity and narrow mindedness incredibly depressing.

It's your web site, obviously, but isn't it possible to widen our horizons a bit?

You're acting like a typical Virgo!

Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle 16 Dec 17 9.36am
Originally posted by OhthisbloodyPC Fine. It's your ball and we have to play your way. But just so I understand. It seems to be OK to use words like s* and dickhead, in a very negative post. Firstly it isn't my ball as it's the site admin that sets the rules and one of the rules that everyone signs up to is about not insulting other forum members Originally posted by OhthisbloodyPC I assume on Palace Talk we must confine ourselves to the usual topics. The Ref robbed us Parish Must Go Sack the manager. Wilf just isn't good enough. I always thought these were a bit narrow. One can discuss anything in Palace Talk as long as it's Palace related and with the best will in the world many of your posts aren't really Palace related but belong in what used to be known as Fun Talk but in now General Talk Originally posted by OhthisbloodyPC The other thing is the same negativity shown to other posters (s! Dickhead!) is shown to the players. Partly because the narrow minded posters are now getting encouragement. Unfortunately that isn't against the forum rules Originally posted by OhthisbloodyPC* It's your web site, obviously, but isn't it possible to widen our horizons a bit? You're acting like a typical Virgo! As I said, it's not my web site and I just help out with the site housekeeping. Why shouldn't I act like a typical Virgo as I am one
Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle

16 Dec 17 9.36am

Originally posted by OhthisbloodyPC

Fine. It's your ball and we have to play your way.

But just so I understand.

It seems to be OK to use words like s*** and dickhead, in a very negative post.

Firstly it isn't my ball as it's the site admin that sets the rules and one of the rules that everyone signs up to is about not insulting other forum members

Originally posted by OhthisbloodyPC

I assume on Palace Talk we must confine ourselves to the usual topics.

The Ref robbed us
Parish Must Go
Sack the manager.
Wilf just isn't good enough.

I always thought these were a bit narrow.

One can discuss anything in Palace Talk as long as it's Palace related and with the best will in the world many of your posts aren't really Palace related but belong in what used to be known as Fun Talk but in now General Talk

Originally posted by OhthisbloodyPC

The other thing is the same negativity shown to other posters (s***! Dickhead!) is shown to the players. Partly because the narrow minded posters are now getting encouragement.

Unfortunately that isn't against the forum rules

Originally posted by OhthisbloodyPC

It's your web site, obviously, but isn't it possible to widen our horizons a bit?

You're acting like a typical Virgo!

As I said, it's not my web site and I just help out with the site housekeeping.

Why shouldn't I act like a typical Virgo as I am one

Alert a moderator to this post

BarEagle Monmouth 16 Dec 17 9.59am
Originally posted by Willo This post has been merged from a topic called 'Is hooliganism coming back?' by Midlands Eagle It might be rambling like clematis but it really does essay a great well of oratory and the great cacophanous crescendo of punditry brought merriment to my face. Why be so pretentious? It is not impressive or clever. It shows arrogance, lack of intelligence and a key board warrior with a condescending opinion of others.
Alert a moderator to this post

BarEagle

Monmouth 16 Dec 17 9.59am

Originally posted by Willo

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Is hooliganism coming back?' by Midlands Eagle

It might be rambling like clematis but it really does essay a great well of oratory and the great cacophanous crescendo of punditry brought merriment to my face.

Why be so pretentious? It is not impressive or clever. It shows arrogance, lack of intelligence and a key board warrior with a condescending opinion of others.

Alert a moderator to this post

Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 16 Dec 17 10.25am
Originally posted by BarEagle Why be so pretentious? It is not impressive or clever. It shows arrogance, lack of intelligence and a key board warrior with a condescending opinion of others. Wasn't there mention a couple of posts ago about not hurling insults at forum members ? I totally refute the risible allegations about me. And YES, I can do so without recourse to personal slurs. Edited by Willo (16 Dec 2017 10.26am)
Alert a moderator to this post

Willo

South coast - west of Brighton. 16 Dec 17 10.25am

Originally posted by BarEagle

Why be so pretentious? It is not impressive or clever. It shows arrogance, lack of intelligence and a key board warrior with a condescending opinion of others.

Wasn't there mention a couple of posts ago about not hurling insults at forum members ?

I totally refute the risible allegations about me.
And YES, I can do so without recourse to personal slurs.

Edited by Willo (16 Dec 2017 10.26am)

Alert a moderator to this post

YT Oxford 16 Dec 17 10.31am
What is it with this thread? I read the OP and thought it was a good bit of satire, in similar vein to ‘Punch’, ‘Private Eye’, ‘Eagle Eye’ etc, then I read on and see that it’s generated bilious reaction. It’s just a bit of fun. What’s the matter with some people? Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)
Alert a moderator to this post

Oxford 16 Dec 17 10.31am

What is it with this thread? I read the OP and thought it was a good bit of satire, in similar vein to ‘Punch’, ‘Private Eye’, ‘Eagle Eye’ etc, then I read on and see that it’s generated bilious reaction.

It’s just a bit of fun. What’s the matter with some people?

Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 16 Dec 17 10.35am
Originally posted by collier row eagle What about the nuclear device found under Brighton pier ? No mention of that? Turned out to be an atomic bum. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 16 Dec 17 10.35am

Originally posted by collier row eagle

What about the nuclear device found under Brighton pier ? No mention of that?

Turned out to be an atomic bum.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 16 Dec 17 10.40am
Originally posted by YT What is it with this thread? I read the OP and thought it was a good bit of satire, in similar vein to ‘Punch’, ‘Private Eye’, ‘Eagle Eye’ etc, then I read on and see that it’s generated bilious reaction. It’s just a bit of fun. What’s the matter with some people? I concur with these sentiments. I expressed my positivity in respect of the post, yet somehow I attracted a "Bilious reaction" on account of my style of articulation ! Goodness me, the slurs were so 'Off Piste' and those who know me would shake their heads in incredulity on reading the accusations. Anyhow, let's get back to the subject matter.
Alert a moderator to this post

Willo

South coast - west of Brighton. 16 Dec 17 10.40am

Originally posted by YT

It’s just a bit of fun. What’s the matter with some people?

I concur with these sentiments.

I expressed my positivity in respect of the post, yet somehow I attracted a "Bilious reaction" on account of my style of articulation ! Goodness me, the slurs were so 'Off Piste' and those who know me would shake their heads in incredulity on reading the accusations.

Anyhow, let's get back to the subject matter.

Alert a moderator to this post

OhthisbloodyPC 16 Dec 17 12.53pm
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle As I said, it's not my web site and I just help out with the site housekeeping. Why shouldn't I act like a typical Virgo as I am one Thanks Midlands Eagle. You sound remarkably balanced for one who must be badly affected by the turbulence around Saturn at the moment. (That will clear up next week, by the way, as the ramification of Palace's one nil away win at Leicester begins to sink in)
Alert a moderator to this post

OhthisbloodyPC

16 Dec 17 12.53pm

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

As I said, it's not my web site and I just help out with the site housekeeping.

Why shouldn't I act like a typical Virgo as I am one

Thanks Midlands Eagle. You sound remarkably balanced for one who must be badly affected by the turbulence around Saturn at the moment. (That will clear up next week, by the way, as the ramification of Palace's one nil away win at Leicester begins to sink in)

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Have the Ultras gone too far this time?

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors