Who? Sounds like clickbait...

It isn't just him. I've just been watching Sky Sports saturday talk about football that's going on all afternoon whilst not being allowed to actually watch any of it show.

They talked about the Southampton - Palace game for about five minutes without once mentioning Palace, Hodgson, any Palace player or anything we did. Southampton were s***, Pellegrino made poor decisions, so they lost.

That Hodgson employed excellent tactics, made excellent decisions, made the right substitutions and that Milivojevic scored an absolutely superb goal - not a word.

I suppose it didn't help that they had Matt le Tissier sitting there, a s*** pundit with an obvious Saints interest and the brains of a teddy bear.

Edited by chateauferret (06 Jan 2018 3.04pm)

============
The Ferret
============

When he starts debates about Wilf diving I am always tempted to ring him up and dig him out about that promotion year. He started that campaign on stop giving Palace penalties by watching the goal highlights on tv. He never saw the whole game, because he would have realised that wilf and Yannick were driving into the box at high speed at every opportunity. He never saw that we were actually denied twice as many penalties as we were given. If he had watched the games, he would have realised that accusing Wilf of diving was not the major issue at that time, as Glenn Murray was the sly crafty one who would run into the box and then just stop so the defender would clatter him to the floor. I honestly believe that Wilf's reputation stems from Durham's lazy journalism at this time.

has resisted writing a single post on the Ross McCormack thread !!!

He's the Katie Hopkins/Piers Morgan of the football world. He is bitter that we sent his team (Peterborough) down. The less people pay attention to him the better, as he's controversy is what keeps him in that job.

[Link]