This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
We need to do a bit more than a few shots or touches in the opposition box every month or two. Not looking for Potterball before it’s possible, and when we do pass it around we wait for the opposition to all get behind the ball so we have everyone behind the ball just further up the pitch. It’s understandable for some of the matches but not all 38. What gets me is that we dont seem to have a plan for attacking. I can see weve been drilled in defending, but what's our attacking policy. We used to be a counter attacking team...not anymore, we dont have the pace for it anymore, even zaha holds the ball up these days. We used to play the long ball to the big centre forward..not anymore, we have the big centre forward but dont play to his strengths. So not really sure what our style of play is???
|
|
| palace99 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by spartakev2
What gets me is that we dont seem to have a plan for attacking. I can see weve been drilled in defending, but what's our attacking policy. We used to be a counter attacking team...not anymore, we dont have the pace for it anymore, even zaha holds the ball up these days. We used to play the long ball to the big centre forward..not anymore, we have the big centre forward but dont play to his strengths. So not really sure what our style of play is??? supposedly our stats were better against Liverpool when we lost 7.0. More possession, more chances created, more touches in the opposition's box etc. It's a funny old game, however, the law of averages says we need to improve our approach asap as a better team will destroy us
|
|
|
Originally posted by Aquilachrysaetos
Brighton may have dominated possession but were they unlucky? Did they have any shots which beat both defense and goalie but bounced back out off the inside of the post or the underside of the bar? No. Did they have any contentious VAR decisions go against them? No. Did they force VG into any worldy saves? No. Were they hacked to bits to prevent them from building attacks? No - not a single Palace booking - not even Luka. Instead they were completely thwarted by some brilliant defending , and then conceded two excellent goals. We shouldn't feel any embarrassment, just great pride in the boys who put in a heroic display. And just a little bit of shadenfreude as it was Brighton! I garland these comments with praise.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Aquilachrysaetos
Brighton may have dominated possession but were they unlucky? Did they have any shots which beat both defense and goalie but bounced back out off the inside of the post or the underside of the bar? No. Did they have any contentious VAR decisions go against them? No. Did they force VG into any worldy saves? No. Were they hacked to bits to prevent them from building attacks? No - not a single Palace booking - not even Luka. Instead they were completely thwarted by some brilliant defending , and then conceded two excellent goals. We shouldn't feel any embarrassment, just great pride in the boys who put in a heroic display. And just a little bit of shadenfreude as it was Brighton! Well said. We defended well and took our chances which is exactly what you need to do to win a football match. Some people seem to think extra points are given for style (thankfully they aren't although both goals were pretty stylish).
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
|
Originally posted by Aquilachrysaetos
Brighton may have dominated possession but were they unlucky? Did they have any shots which beat both defense and goalie but bounced back out off the inside of the post or the underside of the bar? No. Did they have any contentious VAR decisions go against them? No. Did they force VG into any worldy saves? No. Were they hacked to bits to prevent them from building attacks? No - not a single Palace booking - not even Luka. Instead they were completely thwarted by some brilliant defending , and then conceded two excellent goals. We shouldn't feel any embarrassment, just great pride in the boys who put in a heroic display. And just a little bit of shadenfreude as it was Brighton!
|
|
|
Originally posted by topcat
I'm not embarrassed, still over the moon with the win. Brighton looked pretty good at times but, aside from a 20 minute period in the 2nd half, never really looked as if that dominance was going to come to anything. All those shots but very few on target. This was supposed to be their big chance to show us up and they blew it. If anyone should be embarrassed, it's them. Agreed, on NSC last night they were demanding Potter out, fed up with tippy tappy football with no end result. They have won once at home this season. They acknowlegded our best players were out and they still couldnt win.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hutchyeagle
This seasons two games against Brighton , we had 3 shots last night at The Amex and 1 shot at Selhurst That’s Brighton 45 shots to Palace’s 4 no - three points.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Ashtcb
Was like watching the alamo,if fans are happy watching their team just defend,then okay.I am not,we were lucky,should have lost 4-1,at least.Cant wait until a new manager.Need to score goals thought that was what the game was about.We need a goal scorer,simple.I hate Brighton! Maybe it escaped your attention, but we did score goals, 2. Brighton got 1. No luck involved.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
|
Originally posted by NEILLO
Maybe it escaped your attention, but we did score goals, 2. No luck involved.
On the question of goals scored, we are only 2 behind what we got in the whole of last season and have scored more league goals than SEVEN teams in our league (including, of course, Brighton, despite all their pretty football). And we are managing it with the worst injury record of any team in the PL (including Liverpool).
|
|
|
Originally posted by doombear
On the question of goals scored, we are only 2 behind what we got in the whole of last season and have scored more league goals than SEVEN teams in our league (including, of course, Brighton, despite all their pretty football). And we are managing it with the worst injury record of any team in the PL (including Liverpool). The worst injury list of any team in the PL? Really? The only players who we have injured that are likely to be in the squad are Zaha, Schlupp, McArthur and Tomkins. That’s just 4. Compared to a lot of teams including Liverpool I reckon that’s pretty good and certainly no excuse for our pathetic and embarrassing tactics.
|
|
|
Originally posted by rollercoaster
Embarassed? come on we're Palace, everyone hates us even the BBC and the more they hate us the more we like it. If you do not get that you perhaps haven't been a Palace supporter for long enough. is that a ‘one-upmanship’ on Millwall’s ‘no-one likes us’?
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
|
Originally posted by pompeyeagle
The worst injury list of any team in the PL? Really? The only players who we have injured that are likely to be in the squad are Zaha, Schlupp, McArthur and Tomkins. That’s just 4. Compared to a lot of teams including Liverpool I reckon that’s pretty good and certainly no excuse for our pathetic and embarrassing tactics.
Also we have to consider the issue over the whole season so far and we started our season with our reserve defence in place and like Liverpool have been unable to start with a settled defensive line-up for most of the season. As for Liverpool how many of their injured players would be first choice? I'd say, Van Digt, one out of Gomes and Matip and possibly Jota. Hendo only joined the list last weekend. I doubt there has been a single game this season in which we've been able to field our first choice XI.
|
|
|
Originally posted by doombear
Although we haven't yet seen him, I'd add Ferguson to that list as a probable first team starter and many (although, not me) would also say Sakho. In other words half our first team starting XI. Also we have to consider the issue over the whole season so far and we started our season with our reserve defence in place and like Liverpool have been unable to start with a settled defensive line-up for most of the season. As for Liverpool how many of their injured players would be first choice? I'd say, Van Digt, one out of Gomes and Matip and possibly Jota. Hendo only joined the list last weekend. I doubt there has been a single game this season in which we've been able to field our first choice XI. We desperately miss Sakho's distribution. And although he often looks vulnerable - when he plays the stats suggest we're a better defensive unit.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Buckspalace
25 shots but how many actually on target 5. And how many of those 5 had guaita worried, the goal for me and the minor scramble in the box
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.