Rayner to be questioned

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Rayner to be questioned " under caution " by GMP

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Mapletree Croydon 29 May 24 9.40pm
Originally posted by eagleman13 Do try not to be so patronising, young child. This thread incase you forgot is about that Raynor bird. Do keep up, * **. I suppose you mean Rayner. The name is even in the thread title. Do keep up. And Rayner has been ‘cleared’ by HMRC, even The Daily Mail says so. You living in a yurt?
Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree

Croydon 29 May 24 9.40pm

Originally posted by eagleman13

Do try not to be so patronising, young child.

This thread incase you forgot is about that Raynor bird. Do keep up, *** ****.

I suppose you mean Rayner. The name is even in the thread title. Do keep up.

And Rayner has been ‘cleared’ by HMRC, even The Daily Mail says so. You living in a yurt?

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 29 May 24 9.46pm
Originally posted by Mapletree I suppose you mean Rayner. The name is even in the thread title. Do keep up. And Rayner has been ‘cleared’ by HMRC, even The Daily Mail says so. You living in a yurt? Cleaned ! … just before an election how strange.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 29 May 24 9.46pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

I suppose you mean Rayner. The name is even in the thread title. Do keep up.

And Rayner has been ‘cleared’ by HMRC, even The Daily Mail says so. You living in a yurt?

Cleaned ! … just before an election how strange.

Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree Croydon 29 May 24 11.32pm
Originally posted by cryrst Cleaned ! … just before an election how strange. Cleaned your yurt? Where do you plug in the vacuum cleaner?
Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree

Croydon 29 May 24 11.32pm

Originally posted by cryrst

Cleaned ! … just before an election how strange.

Cleaned your yurt? Where do you plug in the vacuum cleaner?

Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11 Beckenham 30 May 24 7.36am
Originally posted by Mapletree Cleaned your yurt? Where do you plug in the vacuum cleaner? I've stayed in a yurt they do have power points even in the middle of the desert believe it or not. just saying. Back to the thread. Edited by Badger11 (30 May 2024 8.22am) One more point
Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11

Beckenham 30 May 24 7.36am

Originally posted by Mapletree

Cleaned your yurt? Where do you plug in the vacuum cleaner?

I've stayed in a yurt they do have power points even in the middle of the desert believe it or not. just saying.

Back to the thread.

Edited by Badger11 (30 May 2024 8.22am)

One more point

Alert a moderator to this post

The Dolphin 30 May 24 7.50am
Listening to a few commentators over the last day or so, now that they are free to comment further, it seems clear that she broke the rules and gained from it as well. GMP with Burnham in their ear decided it wasn't worth it as did the Council and HMRC. The gains were small so who cares, however, it is the lies she told/tells that make it difficult to bear. This woman apparently met Muslim leaders two days ago, covering up her assets in deference to them and promising them that if they voted for her then she would publicly recognise Palestine. She has no shame - vile individual that she is.
Alert a moderator to this post

The Dolphin

30 May 24 7.50am

Listening to a few commentators over the last day or so, now that they are free to comment further, it seems clear that she broke the rules and gained from it as well.
GMP with Burnham in their ear decided it wasn't worth it as did the Council and HMRC.
The gains were small so who cares, however, it is the lies she told/tells that make it difficult to bear.
This woman apparently met Muslim leaders two days ago, covering up her assets in deference to them and promising them that if they voted for her then she would publicly recognise Palestine.
She has no shame - vile individual that she is.

Alert a moderator to this post

EverybodyDannsNow SE19 30 May 24 7.58am
Originally posted by The Dolphin Listening to a few commentators over the last day or so, now that they are free to comment further, it seems clear that she broke the rules and gained from it as well. GMP with Burnham in their ear decided it wasn't worth it as did the Council and HMRC. The gains were small so who cares, however, it is the lies she told/tells that make it difficult to bear. This woman apparently met Muslim leaders two days ago, covering up her assets in deference to them and promising them that if they voted for her then she would publicly recognise Palestine. She has no shame - vile individual that she is. Apparently at the same meeting she said ‘f*** the royal family’ and shared her admiration for sharia law while proclaiming ‘Allahu Akbar!’ Vile.
Alert a moderator to this post

EverybodyDannsNow

SE19 30 May 24 7.58am

Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow

Originally posted by The Dolphin

Listening to a few commentators over the last day or so, now that they are free to comment further, it seems clear that she broke the rules and gained from it as well.
GMP with Burnham in their ear decided it wasn't worth it as did the Council and HMRC.
The gains were small so who cares, however, it is the lies she told/tells that make it difficult to bear.
This woman apparently met Muslim leaders two days ago, covering up her assets in deference to them and promising them that if they voted for her then she would publicly recognise Palestine.
She has no shame - vile individual that she is.

Apparently at the same meeting she said ‘f*** the royal family’ and shared her admiration for sharia law while proclaiming ‘Allahu Akbar!’

Vile.

Alert a moderator to this post

The Dolphin 30 May 24 8.09am
Nice grown up answer!
Alert a moderator to this post

The Dolphin

30 May 24 8.09am

Nice grown up answer!

Alert a moderator to this post

HKOwen Hong Kong 30 May 24 11.41am
Originally posted by The Dolphin Listening to a few commentators over the last day or so, now that they are free to comment further, it seems clear that she broke the rules and gained from it as well. GMP with Burnham in their ear decided it wasn't worth it as did the Council and HMRC. The gains were small so who cares, however, it is the lies she told/tells that make it difficult to bear. This woman apparently met Muslim leaders two days ago, covering up her assets in deference to them and promising them that if they voted for her then she would publicly recognise Palestine. She has no shame - vile individual that she is. She said she would push for the UK to recognise Palestine Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.
Alert a moderator to this post

HKOwen

Hong Kong 30 May 24 11.41am

Originally posted by The Dolphin

She said she would push for the UK to recognise Palestine

Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree Croydon 17 Jun 24 10.42pm
Originally posted by HKOwen She said she would push for the UK to recognise Palestine As proposed by resolution 181 in 1947 do you mean?
Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree

Croydon 17 Jun 24 10.42pm

Originally posted by HKOwen

She said she would push for the UK to recognise Palestine

As proposed by resolution 181 in 1947 do you mean?

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 18 Jun 24 12.40am
They could just change the name to Palestein and then wait for the Americans to pull a hamstring throwing money at it. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

18 Jun 24 12.40am

They could just change the name to Palestein and then wait for the Americans to pull a hamstring throwing money at it.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

The Dolphin 18 Jun 24 6.22am
We are seeing very little of her right now so even Sir Keir is not happy with her. Just wait until her snarling left wing look appears large on our screens after July 4th
Alert a moderator to this post

The Dolphin

18 Jun 24 6.22am

We are seeing very little of her right now so even Sir Keir is not happy with her.
Just wait until her snarling left wing look appears large on our screens after July 4th

Alert a moderator to this post

palace99 New Mills 18 Jun 24 10.11am
Originally posted by The Dolphin Listening to a few commentators over the last day or so, now that they are free to comment further, it seems clear that she broke the rules and gained from it as well. GMP with Burnham in their ear decided it wasn't worth it as did the Council and HMRC. The gains were small so who cares, however, it is the lies she told/tells that make it difficult to bear. This woman apparently met Muslim leaders two days ago, covering up her assets in deference to them and promising them that if they voted for her then she would publicly recognise Palestine. She has no shame - vile individual that she is. I'm not sure how you can say it's clear see broke the rules as i have explained the rules in a previous reply and also explained how costs incurred are used to offset any potential gain. I'm not sure why the police would even be involved - if they can't be bothered to come out to a burglary why would they get involved with this, it seems a pure HMRC issue. For comparison Nadhim Zahawi deliberately tried to hide a share gain and ended up paying HMRC a £5m fee (the capital gains due and a fine). During this time he denied he was being investigated, was promoted to chancellor of the Exchequer (the 2nd highest govt position), and got his lawyer to send threatening letters to journalists who questioned his statement. Did the police get involved? Of course not. Rayners potential gain (c£1.5k) was 3,000 times less than this amount yet seems to have got considerably more coverage.
Alert a moderator to this post

palace99

New Mills 18 Jun 24 10.11am

Originally posted by The Dolphin

Listening to a few commentators over the last day or so, now that they are free to comment further, it seems clear that she broke the rules and gained from it as well.
GMP with Burnham in their ear decided it wasn't worth it as did the Council and HMRC.
The gains were small so who cares, however, it is the lies she told/tells that make it difficult to bear.
This woman apparently met Muslim leaders two days ago, covering up her assets in deference to them and promising them that if they voted for her then she would publicly recognise Palestine.
She has no shame - vile individual that she is.

I'm not sure how you can say it's clear see broke the rules as i have explained the rules in a previous reply and also explained how costs incurred are used to offset any potential gain.

I'm not sure why the police would even be involved - if they can't be bothered to come out to a burglary why would they get involved with this, it seems a pure HMRC issue.

For comparison Nadhim Zahawi deliberately tried to hide a share gain and ended up paying HMRC a £5m fee (the capital gains due and a fine). During this time he denied he was being investigated, was promoted to chancellor of the Exchequer (the 2nd highest govt position), and got his lawyer to send threatening letters to journalists who questioned his statement.

Did the police get involved? Of course not.

Rayners potential gain (c£1.5k) was 3,000 times less than this amount yet seems to have got considerably more coverage.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Rayner to be questioned " under caution " by GMP

Site Map