This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
| Hoof Hearted 07 Apr 16 11.20am | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by susmik
Have to agree with you on this one hoof and I am a life long tory....Slowly going off the guy I am afraid. He's showing his true colours now... he hasn't come out of this latest tax haven scandal very well and appears to be at best a very slippery customer and at worst a lying cheating tax dodging double standards merchant. Still... good job we're all in it together eh? Where is a decent opposition party/leader when you want one? At this rate we can only rely on Boris/Farage for straight talking, you can forget about Cameron and Osborne.... and Corbyn is not even worth heckling he is so pathetic and ridiculously out of his depth.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
Cameron playing dirty again in this referendum..... Spending £9M on leaflets highlighting what he says are "the key facts" about Brexit.... but none of them are pro Brexit... he has just stated the key issues in support of staying in the EU. Cameron has pulled a fast one doing this now because:- The designated Leave campaign, and its Remain opponent, will be able to spend up to £7m each on advertising and promotion once the official campaign period starts next week. This includes £600,000 of public grants set aside for free mailshots and TV broadcasts. So Cameron's remain team will have spent £16M on it's campaign as opposed to only £7M allowed for the leave campaign. Hardly fair is it!?! Interestingly*, the level of spending when it comes to election/referendum campaigns has showed to have little to no impact on the result of it. *In the jamiemartin911999 sense of interesting
|
|
|
Originally posted by npn
I'm already loving the total patheticness (made up word) of both sides on their facebook campaigns. So far I've had: * How will Brexit affect your football team's squad Dreadful from both sides (but I've received more from the group "Stronger in Europe" or something like that - no idea if they are legit or official or just another fringe group. Hate the whole thing already. It's infuriating isn't it, because people WILL make such a key decision on such ridiculous considerations. You mention some cracking examples, but even the economy is irrelevant in the context of this bid to secure democracy. There will always be those with selfish interests, but it's so sad that some will think they're making the right choice because they have been so confused by a myriad of arguments which deflect from the seriousness of it all. If I wasn't a sad 20-something with a lot of time on my hands, then I'd be just as fed up of it as you are!
|
|
|
out.
Kids,tired of being bothered by your pesky parents? |
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
^^^^^^^^ Little picture Swalecliffe. The bigger picture is that Europe - specifically Western Europe - has functioned a lot better having common economic interests bound by agreements and treaties since the 1950's than it did not having them in the previous 1,000 years of bloodshed. You want to build up walls again? Not for me. I'm gonna have grandkids to think about one day. Edited by Kermit8 (11 Apr 2016 6.09pm) I'm pleased for you, but I have a child due in October, so what's your point? So that's your grand reply, is it? I expected one, but I expected better than that. You call democracy the 'little picture'? I'll leave others to judge that cracker! I totally agree that economic integration is conducive to peace and you're gonna have to trust me (because I don't want to be boring) that I have as solid a grasp as you of the origins of European integration (which lie in the 1920s, by the way). But where you and I differ is that you say: 'the EU is necessary to prevent war'....whereas I say 'The ECC was once necessary to prevent war'. I'm sad you cannot make such a basic distinction between the two organisations, and it is to my child and your grandchildren's detriment that you do. Peace is not owed to the EU, it is owed to global economic integration. If you think that will for peace which exists in the civilised world will dissipate because we leave the EU, and as such we will go to war with our European neighbours...then that really is the pits of all logic. Definitely more Kermit than Kant, I'd say. The conditions under which we went to war do not exist in Europe today. None of that is down to the EUROPEAN UNION. I don't know if you're aware, but that's what we're voting for. The world is integrated whether we like it or not, and no referendum will change that. And, in case you haven't noticed, war ravages the world over, still, today. Your picture isn't really a picture at all, so much as it is a false reality based on a misunderstanding of historical nuances. But anyway, if you know anything about history, you will know that Empires ALWAYS crumble in the end. So, good luck with that. Edited by SwalecliffeEagle (11 Apr 2016 6.34pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by SwalecliffeEagle
I'm pleased for you, but I have a child due in October, so what's your point? So that's your grand reply, is it? I expected one, but I expected better than that. You call democracy the 'little picture'? I'll leave others to judge that cracker! I totally agree that economic integration is conducive to peace and you're gonna have to trust me (because I don't want to be boring) that I have as solid a grasp as you of the origins of European integration (which lie in the 1920s, by the way). But where you and I differ is that you say: 'the EU is necessary to prevent war'....whereas I say 'The ECC was once necessary to prevent war'. I'm sad you cannot make such a basic distinction between the two organisations, and it is to my child and your grandchildren's detriment that you do. Peace is not owed to the EU, it is owed to global economic integration. If you think that will for peace which exists in the civilised world will dissipate because we leave the EU, and as such we will go to war with our European neighbours...then that really is the pits of all logic. Definitely more Kermit than Kant, I'd say. The conditions under which we went to war do not exist in Europe today. None of that is down to the EUROPEAN UNION. I don't know if you're aware, but that's what we're voting for. The world is integrated whether we like it or not, and no referendum will change that. And, in case you haven't noticed, war ravages the world over, still, today. Your picture isn't really a picture at all, so much as it is a false reality based on a misunderstanding of historical nuances. But anyway, if you know anything about history, you will know that Empires ALWAYS crumble in the end. So, good luck with that. Edited by SwalecliffeEagle (11 Apr 2016 6.34pm) Also, you sound like a bit of a nutcase so am wanting to vote 'in' even more now than i did one hour ago Edited by Kermit8 (11 Apr 2016 6.38pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Also, you sound like a bit of a nutcase so am wanting to vote 'in' even more now than i did one hour ago Edited by Kermit8 (11 Apr 2016 6.38pm) Cry me a river. Has someone lost the argument? Go on. I want to hear you admit it. Edited by SwalecliffeEagle (11 Apr 2016 6.48pm) Edited by SwalecliffeEagle (11 Apr 2016 6.48pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by SwalecliffeEagle
Cry me a river. Has someone lost the argument? Go on. I want to hear you admit it. Edited by SwalecliffeEagle (11 Apr 2016 6.48pm) Edited by SwalecliffeEagle (11 Apr 2016 6.48pm) "those that cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" If and when Europe breaks up we will, one year in the middle to distant future, go to war again. Let's not hasten that probable inevitability, shall we? Edited by Kermit8 (11 Apr 2016 7.17pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
"those that cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" If and when Europe breaks up we will, one year in the middle to distant future, go to war again. Let's not hasten that probable inevitability, shall we? Edited by Kermit8 (11 Apr 2016 7.17pm) Ever increasing numbers of military personnel are disputing the "IN" campaign’s scaremongering about the EU and national security. They know that it is NATO, which has kept the peace in Europe and NOT the EU.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
"those that cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" If and when Europe breaks up we will, one year in the middle to distant future, go to war again. Let's not hasten that probable inevitability, shall we? Edited by Kermit8 (11 Apr 2016 7.17pm) Well, fair enough. I respect your conviction and it's a more noble reason than the amount of science funding we get (that sort of point grinds on me), but I really do not share your fear. You maysee me as naive but I just think global integration is too embedded for that. And I believe that when the EU falls something simpler and better will stand in it's place. I don't want walls built, and I don't loathe Europe the place, I just don't want a terrifying amount of control given to other people, with vested interests, who no one can reach out to. That scares me more than war and that's what I see in the here and now.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Ever increasing numbers of military personnel are disputing the "IN" campaign’s scaremongering about the EU and national security. They know that it is NATO, which has kept the peace in Europe and NOT the EU. As you would expect, I couldn't agree more. And perhaps we could spend some of the money we send to Brussels on NATO, thus easing U.S. disquiet at our nonchalance.
|
|
|
Originally posted by SwalecliffeEagle
I'm pleased for you, but I have a child due in October, so what's your point? So that's your grand reply, is it? I expected one, but I expected better than that. You call democracy the 'little picture'? I'll leave others to judge that cracker! I totally agree that economic integration is conducive to peace and you're gonna have to trust me (because I don't want to be boring) that I have as solid a grasp as you of the origins of European integration (which lie in the 1920s, by the way). But where you and I differ is that you say: 'the EU is necessary to prevent war'....whereas I say 'The ECC was once necessary to prevent war'. I'm sad you cannot make such a basic distinction between the two organisations, and it is to my child and your grandchildren's detriment that you do. Peace is not owed to the EU, it is owed to global economic integration. If you think that will for peace which exists in the civilised world will dissipate because we leave the EU, and as such we will go to war with our European neighbours...then that really is the pits of all logic. Definitely more Kermit than Kant, I'd say. The conditions under which we went to war do not exist in Europe today. None of that is down to the EUROPEAN UNION. I don't know if you're aware, but that's what we're voting for. The world is integrated whether we like it or not, and no referendum will change that. And, in case you haven't noticed, war ravages the world over, still, today. Your picture isn't really a picture at all, so much as it is a false reality based on a misunderstanding of historical nuances. But anyway, if you know anything about history, you will know that Empires ALWAYS crumble in the end. So, good luck with that. Edited by SwalecliffeEagle (11 Apr 2016 6.34pm) Yes of course they don't. The 1930's were characterised by economic uncertainty, falls in real wages, general dissatisfaction with the current political order,the rise of far right political parties and nationalism, people blaming certain ethnic and religious groups for problems and a major power who had lost it's empire and turned to a hard man with expansionist ideas. Nope can't see any similarities with today at all. Edited by JHB (11 Apr 2016 9.39pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by SwalecliffeEagle
Those voting to stay have a bad case of EU-bola/ Brussels Syndrome....they've been captive for so long that they have lost any independent spirit they once had. They are political sheep. I am sad for them. They aren't what helped kick the industrial revolution into gear, they aren't the type of people who fought for democracy (no, they're not, because they're not doing it now) and they aren't thinking of the impact their lack of intuition will have on future generations. They are two types of people: the fundamentally misled, and the fundamentally immoral. Indeed, half of them are just that - misled. I can handle this sort, they believe by voting to stay they ARE doing the right thing, and they genuinely feel confused. It's so frustrating, because there's nothing confusing about it. Use your intuition, ask yourself the big questions, and you will arrive at the right decision. The other half however, and they know who they are, are those harbouring their own selfish interests and to hell with the consequences for everyone else, they say! You know the sort, the hideously tanned ex-pat on a beach in Spain who hates England yet all of a sudden professes his love for the country (nowt to do with healthcare, of course). They talk of 'jobs', being 'stronger together' and 'the economy,' and they enjoy dragging people down into the detail because they know it goes nowhere fast. Like idiots, they drag you down to their level and will beat you with experience. That sort of person isn't worth the dripping off my nose. They will have to live with their choice, and I only hope they leave this world after they see the damage they have done to the lives of today's children, and not before. But my message to fellow Brexiters is this: don't get wound up (as I have before) with those who will place their own interests above the moral choice. They will do what they wish to do, and they care not for your democratic birthright. They cannot care, because democracy, whatever they say, is what this referendum is all about. It is nothing to do with jobs, 'togetherness', the environment or intelligence sharing (that's my personal favourite)... it is about the broad, overarching principle upon which any decent, liberal society is built....that of having self-determination and direct representation. It is an inalienable right which will be severely undermined by anyone who votes to stay. There is no legitimate counter-argument to this. Not one. Nothing is more important than our right to fair representation, and remaining in the EU will only weaken that right. I do hope to god no one is bold enough to argue that basic, largely-accepted point. Democracy is ALL anyone should concern themselves with when it comes to this vote. It overrides everything, for everyone. Ignore the so-called 'facts' which no one knows of and use your goddamned instincts, like an actual person with an innate sense of justice and reason. I think it was Kant who described the Enlightenment as 'having the courage to use your own reason'. I'd listen to Kant, and not Cameron, if I were you.
What's your view on the monarchy, house of lords and the current voting system?
|
|
|
Originally posted by JHB
What's your view on the monarchy, house of lords and the current voting system? Christ, you've got it in for me haven't you...
|
|
|
Originally posted by SwalecliffeEagle
Christ, you've got it in for me haven't you... Not at all. Just discussing the points. I agree that the EU in its current format lacks sufficient democratic accountability. To be consistent on the points around democracy being your key driver though then I take it you'd have to be in favour of a directly elected upper chamber of the UK Parliament and some sort of reform to the voting system. It can't really be right can it that UKIP got 4m votes at the last election and only 1 MP?
|
|
|
Originally posted by SwalecliffeEagle
As you would expect, I couldn't agree more. And perhaps we could spend some of the money we send to Brussels on NATO, thus easing U.S. disquiet at our nonchalance. The EU costs us £350 MILLION a week.We get less than half of this back and we have NO control over the way it's spent - this is decided by politicians and officials in Brussels, rather than those we elected here at home. Edited by Willo (11 Apr 2016 10.45pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by SwalecliffeEagle
I'm pleased for you, but I have a child due in October, so what's your point? So that's your grand reply, is it? I expected one, but I expected better than that. You call democracy the 'little picture'? I'll leave others to judge that cracker! I totally agree that economic integration is conducive to peace and you're gonna have to trust me (because I don't want to be boring) that I have as solid a grasp as you of the origins of European integration (which lie in the 1920s, by the way). But where you and I differ is that you say: 'the EU is necessary to prevent war'....whereas I say 'The ECC was once necessary to prevent war'. I'm sad you cannot make such a basic distinction between the two organisations, and it is to my child and your grandchildren's detriment that you do. Peace is not owed to the EU, it is owed to global economic integration. If you think that will for peace which exists in the civilised world will dissipate because we leave the EU, and as such we will go to war with our European neighbours...then that really is the pits of all logic. Definitely more Kermit than Kant, I'd say. The conditions under which we went to war do not exist in Europe today. None of that is down to the EUROPEAN UNION. I don't know if you're aware, but that's what we're voting for. The world is integrated whether we like it or not, and no referendum will change that. And, in case you haven't noticed, war ravages the world over, still, today. Your picture isn't really a picture at all, so much as it is a false reality based on a misunderstanding of historical nuances. But anyway, if you know anything about history, you will know that Empires ALWAYS crumble in the end. So, good luck with that. Edited by SwalecliffeEagle (11 Apr 2016 6.34pm) One of the best ever posts on here. Bravo.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.