This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
David Miliband's thoughts: ""My message is simple: Now is not the time for unilateral political disarmament. Edited by Kermit8 (12 Apr 2016 8.22am) I'm pro exit - and have never thought anyone owes us anything, a little too much prolix from DM perhaps.
|
|
| Hoof Hearted 12 Apr 16 12.12pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
The EU costs us £350 MILLION a week.We get less than half of this back and we have NO control over the way it's spent - this is decided by politicians and officials in Brussels, rather than those we elected here at home. You keep reminding them Willo.... The left (sorry remain) camp, put their fingers in their ears and sing lalala when this is brought up. We are wasting over £175 MILLION a week after all the subsidies we get from the EU because of bureaucratic waste and the needs of poorer EU nations. We will be much better off economically outside of the EU.
|
|
| Hoof Hearted 12 Apr 16 12.16pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
David Miliband's thoughts: "How can I manipulate myself back into the political scene in the UK after the embarrassing loss to my goofy brother a few years back and being in the wilderness since?" EFA. Wouldn't trust any Miliband as far as I could throw one... all were like Nazi Generals to Blair's Hitler.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
You keep reminding them Willo.... The left (sorry remain) camp, put their fingers in their ears and sing lalala when this is brought up. We are wasting over £175 MILLION a week after all the subsidies we get from the EU because of bureaucratic waste and the needs of poorer EU nations. We will be much better off economically outside of the EU. Over the past decade the UK has paid over £150 billion to the EU budget. We send
|
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Over the past decade the UK has paid over £150 billion to the EU budget. We send Histrionic lobbying, sir, on your part. We give the EU £18mill a day in real terms once the rebate and others factors are included but we get way more than that back through lower costs in shops,etc, because of our membership. Edited by Kermit8 (12 Apr 2016 12.54pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Hoof Hearted 12 Apr 16 1.06pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Histrionic lobbying, sir, on your part. We give the EU £18mill a day in real terms once the rebate and others factors are included but we get way more than that back through lower costs in shops,etc, because of our membership.
None of which you can prove or even put numbers to, but we are expected to believe it? By contrast many small self employed traders say that the bureaucratic terms and regulation the EU impose cause them to have higher costs. So... at best if I'm being generous ... my argument completely negates yours, so why are we paying a net £175 Million a week?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
None of which you can prove or even put numbers to, but we are expected to believe it? By contrast many small self employed traders say that the bureaucratic terms and regulation the EU impose cause them to have higher costs. So... at best if I'm being generous ... my argument completely negates yours, so why are we paying a net £175 Million a week? £18mill x 7 days = £126million not £175mil. As for proof well, this and a bit of common sense and rationale go a long way. "Access to a .6 trillion a year Single Market of 500m people is the key benefit UK firms’ access to the Single Market goes beyond a standard free-trade agreement - the EU has eliminated tariff barriers and customs procedures within its borders, and has taken strides towards removing non-tariff barriers - such as different product regulations - by enforcing EU-wide competition law and coordinating product regulations. The EU is a springboard for trade with the rest of the world through its global clout: it accounted for 23% of the global economy in 2012 in dollar terms. Through 30 trade deals negotiated by the EU, including the Single Market itself, British firms have full access to a trillion market. The recent deal with Canada and on-going discussions with Japan and the US could double this to trillion - the UK would struggle to achieve the same quality of trade deals independently. CBI It's staring us all in the face. Economically, the EU is pretty good for us. If someone could disprove that and have a concrete and definite and implementable plan which will be better for us than being a member then go for it. Edited by Kermit8 (12 Apr 2016 2.09pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
David Miliband's thoughts: ""My message is simple: Now is not the time for unilateral political disarmament. Edited by Kermit8 (12 Apr 2016 8.22am) That prick doesn't live in the EU, never mind the UK. Every morning, he walks his children from the family’s rented apartment in Manhattan’s well-heeled Upper West Side to school and then joins the suited masses converging on midtown offices. The only delusional is that he thinks anyone gives a crap what he says about it.
Optimistic as ever |
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
£18mill x 7 days = £126million not £175mil. As for proof well, this and a bit of common sense and rationale go a long way. "Access to a .6 trillion a year Single Market of 500m people is the key benefit UK firms’ access to the Single Market goes beyond a standard free-trade agreement - the EU has eliminated tariff barriers and customs procedures within its borders, and has taken strides towards removing non-tariff barriers - such as different product regulations - by enforcing EU-wide competition law and coordinating product regulations. The EU is a springboard for trade with the rest of the world through its global clout: it accounted for 23% of the global economy in 2012 in dollar terms. Through 30 trade deals negotiated by the EU, including the Single Market itself, British firms have full access to a trillion market. The recent deal with Canada and on-going discussions with Japan and the US could double this to trillion - the UK would struggle to achieve the same quality of trade deals independently. CBI It's staring us all in the face. Economically, the EU is pretty good for us. If someone could disprove that and have a concrete and definite and implementable plan which will be better for us than being a member then go for it. Edited by Kermit8 (12 Apr 2016 2.09pm) Did we not trade with anyone else before and will people refuse to do so were we to vote out? We would have had our own pre-EEC deals with Canada and the US. Why could a new trans-Atlantic deal not be extended to an independent Britain? Edited by johnfirewall (12 Apr 2016 2.51pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by nhp61
The "In" campaign are continually banging on about how much worse off we would be if we left, how much weaker we would be, how more dangerous the world will be, blah blah blah... It's all cobblers. Nobody knows what it will be like if we leave. One thing I do know, and that is if we vote to leave, our government will be back in charge, making laws that benefit the UK. Cameron's pathetic "renegotiation" isn't worth the paper it's written on. Vote to remain, and the EU parliament can, as they have threatened, block what minor concessions that were agreed. Making the whole pantomime a complete waste of time. Our parliamentary system is not perfect, but at least we can vote out whoever is in power. Our politicians don't have the experience, know how, guts or courage to negotiate anything if we leave and IMO that's part of why they'd prefer to stay. They've rarely ever had to. They've been so used to being ruled by an external body they don't know anything else. Just like an abused spouse, they make excuses and are scared of what's on the other side.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Histrionic lobbying, sir, on your part. We give the EU £18mill a day in real terms once the rebate and others factors are included but we get way more than that back through lower costs in shops,etc, because of our membership. Edited by Kermit8 (12 Apr 2016 12.54pm)
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
|
Originally posted by johnfirewall
Did we not trade with anyone else before and will people refuse to do so were we to vote out? We would have had our own pre-EEC deals with Canada and the US. Why could a new trans-Atlantic deal not be extended to an independent Britain? Edited by johnfirewall (12 Apr 2016 2.51pm) Whilst we are in the EU we cannot make deals on our own.Consequently we have no trade deals with allies such as the USA,Australia or India, or important growing economies such as India and Brazil.Instead of making a deal which is beneficial to the UK, we have to wait for the 27 other countries to agree to it.
|
|
|
Originally posted by nhp61
The "In" campaign are continually banging on about how much worse off we would be if we left, how much weaker we would be, how more dangerous the world will be, blah blah blah... It's all cobblers. Nobody knows what it will be like if we leave. One thing I do know, and that is if we vote to leave, our government will be back in charge, making laws that benefit the UK. If we stay, we will end up being more and more under the thumb of unelected and unaccountable foreigners. Cameron's pathetic "renegotiation" isn't worth the paper it's written on. Vote to remain, and the EU parliament can, as they have threatened, block what minor concessions that were agreed. Making the whole pantomime a complete waste of time. Our parliamentary system is not perfect, but at least we can vote out whoever is in power. I agree with the desire for democratic accountability but to be consistent Brexit supporters must surely also campaign for the abolition of the House of Lords, the Monarchy and a reform of the voting system as well.
|
|
|
Originally posted by dannyh
Nice attempt but a big fat fall flat on yer face fail. It's in the link which you obviously haven't read. You will learn something if you do. Go for it.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Latest IMF report backed up by a leading world economist has a forecast which is pretty bad if a Brexit occurs. Well worth a read for both sides. Edited by Kermit8 (12 Apr 2016 9.26pm)
Guess it would be pretty bad for them if they couldn't rely on our payments, just like the other EU countries having to stump up to keep their private club running without our contributions.
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Nice attempt but a big fat fall flat on yer face fail. It's in the link which you obviously haven't read. You will learn something if you do. Go for it. HAHA you really have turned to the dark side I remember posts of your professing not to be lefty blah blah. You go about accusing posters of "histrionics" and your doing exactly the same thing to suit your argument, but when anyone dares point out the flaws in your argument, as becky has done already with that load of old woof from the IMF, we are all stupid froathing at the mouth racists. You sound more and more like Corbyn with each passing post. Ohh and just to show I did bother reading your link this is from it. in the same post you accuse the poster of histrionics. in relation to the money we pay the EU. "For context, that is more than the annual budget of the Home Office, which spends about £9 billion a year. It’s around a tenth of the budget for the NHS in England. It’s also enough to reduce the basic rate of income tax by 3p in the pound." That amount is 12.9 BILLION which is after the rebate that THATCHER negotiated in 84,and is in effect enough money to give everyone in the UK £200. My original comment stands im afraid old chap.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
|
Originally posted by becky
Guess it would be pretty bad for them if they couldn't rely on our payments, just like the other EU countries having to stump up to keep their private club running without our contributions. Your wasting your time he's currently having a mid life bromance with Gussett and Corbyn.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.