This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Here we go, couldn't help yourself could you. Why do you feel the need. No Willo threads today/ Just banter that's all !!!! Some people on here probably think I am a "Stuffed shirt" (And worse !) but whilst I am not over-burdened with charisma I can be a cheerful chappie at times !. Let's get back to the subject matter.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by bexleydave
"Smoke and mirrors" is an idiom for a deceptive, fraudulent or insubstantial explanation or description. And still the man is so insubstantial that he can't post without the insults. I am sure that the definition is correct, I haven't checked, however, there is a big difference between being fraudulent, deceptive or insubstantial. Parish being fraudulent would imply that he is trying to make personal gain out of being dishonest. He is not. Deceptive would imply that he is being dishonest. Which he is not. Insubstantial would mean that he is not being dishonest, but is keeping some information private. Which is exactly what he is doing. The operative word in the definition is "or" which means that the term applies to any one of the three definitions. This, it is quite feasible for Parish to be partaking in "smoke and mirrors" without being deceitful.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
Just banter that's all !!!! Some people on here probably think I am a "Stuffed shirt" (And worse !) but whilst I am not over-burdened with charisma I can be a cheerful chappie at times !. Let's get back to the subject matter. When?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Palace in the Blood
When? I think, but sometimes I'm not sure, that people have lives outside the HOL.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by dp
I am sure that the definition is correct, I haven't checked, however, there is a big difference between being fraudulent, deceptive or insubstantial. Parish being fraudulent would imply that he is trying to make personal gain out of being dishonest. He is not. Deceptive would imply that he is being dishonest. Which he is not. Insubstantial would mean that he is not being dishonest, but is keeping some information private. Which is exactly what he is doing. The operative word in the definition is "or" which means that the term applies to any one of the three definitions. This, it is quite feasible for Parish to be partaking in "smoke and mirrors" without being deceitful.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Brentmiester_General ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by BigNasty12
He is rather unscrupulous in business dealings.
"We love you Palace, we f@cking hate Man U, We love you Palace, we hate the brighton too, We love you Palace we play in red 'n' blue, so f@ck you, and you ... |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by dp
Its not my job to give you hope Den. If you want to believe the spin and can't see that Zaha wouldn't have signed a new Contract without some indication of our ambition next year, then you are beyond any help that I could give you. the exit clause in his contract would cover that if we were relegated, hopefully not but first we need a manager and then prepare!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Palace quiz. Who scored Palace first premier league goal back in the prem after promotion in 12/13 ? Edited by Dan89 (18 Jun 2017 7.31pm)
Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by BigNasty12
How do you know ANY of this? Have you had business dealings with SP? SP could possibly be unscrupulous there's absolutely ZERO way you can make any of those assertions unless you've had business dealing with SP in the past. I think you might need to look a bit further back in the thread to see the context. I was explaining why I could say that SP was using smoke and mirrors without accusing him of being deceitful. I know this because I was referring to The English language. That said, you should take care not to accuse people of being fraudulent and deceitful on social media.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Den1923
the exit clause in his contract would cover that if we were relegated, hopefully not but first we need a manager and then prepare! Yes, but why would he have bothered signing if of he thought we were going to get relegated?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Dan89
Palace quiz. Who scored Palace first premier league goal back in the prem after promotion in 12/13 ? Edited by Dan89 (18 Jun 2017 7.31pm) I remember Moxey giving away the pen against Spurs in the first match that ended 1-0 but alas I am struggling after that. My son reckons we played Sunderland next and remembers Stuart OKeefe scoring, which I also recall but think that wasn't the first goal we scored
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Bexley Eagle
I remember Moxey giving away the pen against Spurs in the first match that ended 1-0 but alas I am struggling after that. My son reckons we played Sunderland next and remembers Stuart OKeefe scoring, which I also recall but think that wasn't the first goal we scored It was chamakh away to stoke. In a 2-1 defeat .
Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.