You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
May 23 2024 3.42am

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 332 of 413 < 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 >

 

View The Dolphin's Profile The Dolphin Flag 29 Sep 23 6.59am Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

It should not even be relevant.
If racism is to be stamped out or if we want to see one colour then the media need to stop feeding it.
However the BBC just want to stir it up.

Edited by The Dolphin (29 Sep 2023 7.00am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 29 Sep 23 8.27am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

So your history is in banking then, like the poster you questioned? Or just maybe your hoping that it isn’t true!

Having any kind of history only gives you the ability to understand the relevant facts.

Until the facts are known everyone is ignorant. History or not.

The only facts we know are that the Republicans are making assertions and are running a fishing investigation to try to find something that supports them.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 29 Sep 23 8.31am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

I notice that the young lad that murdered the 15 year old schoolgirl in Croydon has not had his race mentioned by the BBC but they are happy to headline "Policeman on trial for murdering a black man"

They really should state the race for everyone or no-one in circumstances like this

Surely that’s only because his identity has not yet been released by the police.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 29 Sep 23 8.47am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by The Dolphin

It should not even be relevant.
If racism is to be stamped out or if we want to see one colour then the media need to stop feeding it.
However the BBC just want to stir it up.

Edited by The Dolphin (29 Sep 2023 7.00am)

I agree with the first proposition and have often said just this. We need to stop referring to skin colour or ethnicity as relevant to anyone’s character.

I don’t think the BBC are stirring things up though. I think they are using the accepted terminology when they ought to be leading the move to change.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 29 Sep 23 10.37am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Having any kind of history only gives you the ability to understand the relevant facts.

Until the facts are known everyone is ignorant. History or not.

The only facts we know are that the Republicans are making assertions and are running a fishing investigation to try to find something that supports them.

Surely fishing happened to trump as how did the evidence surface? Goose and gander etc, can’t have it one way only.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 29 Sep 23 2.12pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Surely fishing happened to trump as how did the evidence surface? Goose and gander etc, can’t have it one way only.

There is no need to fish for much with Trump. He does most things in plain sight. He just denies they are illegal or improper. He provides the evidence himself, all duly recorded and available for public scrutiny.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
NE14T Flag 29 Sep 23 7.28pm

Wisbech

At least Trump has transparent stupidity to show his flaws in plain sight not like the Biden’s who use multiple insidious shell nominee and off-shore companies to try to hide the proceeds of crime. We are talking in the region of $50million dollars being funnelled to the Biden from Ukraine, China, Russian and other dodgy jurisdictions with no underlying commercial explanation other than influence and bribery and corruption.

You’re obviously semi- intelligent but like so many you have become blinded in tribal politics and see what you want to see.

Yes. We are in early stages of the investigation but it looks bad…very bad.

Take off your left wing blinders for once.

 


The beatings will stop when morale improves.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 30 Sep 23 7.51am Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 30 Sep 23 11.59am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by NE14T

Wisbech

At least Trump has transparent stupidity to show his flaws in plain sight not like the Biden’s who use multiple insidious shell nominee and off-shore companies to try to hide the proceeds of crime. We are talking in the region of million dollars being funnelled to the Biden from Ukraine, China, Russian and other dodgy jurisdictions with no underlying commercial explanation other than influence and bribery and corruption.

You’re obviously semi- intelligent but like so many you have become blinded in tribal politics and see what you want to see.

Yes. We are in early stages of the investigation but it looks bad…very bad.

Take off your left wing blinders for once.

I have no left-wing anything. I am a centralist and pragmatist.

I have no doubt that Hunter Biden and his uncle have used professional tax and regulation lawyers to structure their businesses, or that overseas interests have used their names and perception of advantageous connection.

That though is not evidence of corruption. It's evidence of the frailties of capitalism and the willingness of people to exploit them.

Joe Biden has no more way of stopping that happening than we do. He might request it and resent it, but no control over it.

The most often quoted "example" of possible corruption is that he has met some of the people involved in the businesses. Big deal. Did he do that as a President, Vice President, Senator or just as a father? We all meet our children's friends and colleagues from time to time. That doesn't mean we discuss business, even if they want to. Joe Biden has a son with problems who he has a duty to support. You don't stop loving your children just because you become President. You take extra care to separate the two.

If there is any evidence of Joe Biden being corrupt then I would be the first to argue that due process should be followed. Right now I don't see anything other than assertions and political fishing trips.


 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 30 Sep 23 12.19pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

That's just more knife-wielding from a nasty right-wing rag who want to undermine confidence in our national broadcaster.

The BBC have covered this. I heard it discussed on both Today and PM and have little doubt it was elsewhere.

Why the news editors of the website chose not to run it as a headline story is up to them. Not the government. It's a good example of their independence.

They obviously thought other things to be more important than small adjustments to statistics that time has revealed.

I don't suppose these get too much publicity when they show a poorer picture than first thought either.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 30 Sep 23 2.58pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That's just more knife-wielding from a nasty right-wing rag who want to undermine confidence in our national broadcaster.

The BBC have covered this. I heard it discussed on both Today and PM and have little doubt it was elsewhere.

Why the news editors of the website chose not to run it as a headline story is up to them. Not the government. It's a good example of their independence.

They obviously thought other things to be more important than small adjustments to statistics that time has revealed.

I don't suppose these get too much publicity when they show a poorer picture than first thought either.

Go on then, put the headline link up to show us you have seen it on the bastion of fairness. If it was last week it would be in one of the 50 news pages you can access.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 30 Sep 23 4.11pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That's just more knife-wielding from a nasty right-wing rag who want to undermine confidence in our national broadcaster.

The BBC have covered this. I heard it discussed on both Today and PM and have little doubt it was elsewhere.

Why the news editors of the website chose not to run it as a headline story is up to them. Not the government. It's a good example of their independence.

They obviously thought other things to be more important than small adjustments to statistics that time has revealed.

I don't suppose these get too much publicity when they show a poorer picture than first thought either.

How predictable

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 332 of 413 < 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)