This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Matov
Trying to stop people buying boats and so on is ignoring the basic reality that as long as people know that once they make it here then they have almost zero chance of being removed, then its not going to stop. The UK has two solutions. The first is to just register people when they turn up, give them a NI number and tell them that if they don't claim or commit a crime for 5 years then all will be fine. To be fair, if people are willing to risk crossing the channel then they have a certain something about them. Probably far worse migrants to have here. The second is to round them up, once they make it ashore, put them in camps and process their claims on the basis that if they are rejected, its immediate deportation or else kept locked up until such a time as they can be sent off. I don't like illegal immigration, especially of this kind, any more than anyone else. I find the whole situation very difficult to come to any conclusions about. We have international and moral obligations, but we also have to expect help from our neighbours, and not blind eyes. This problem won't be solved alone, and bickering won't help. How to stop the trafficking gangs seems critical, and we can't do that from here. I watched some of Newsnight on the evening that that large group drowned. There was an ex head of the Border Force there, on the harbourside in Dover, who was convinced we need to move to Australian style offshore processing, which sorted out their problem. However, the more the conversation went on, the less credible this seemed. Where could we take them? As it apparently takes a very long time for the processing, there would need to be huge facilities available. If I heard correctly as around 75% establish refugee status, what would be the point? So I really don't know how we move forward and don't envy those who have to decide how we try.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don't like illegal immigration, especially of this kind, any more than anyone else. I find the whole situation very difficult to come to any conclusions about. We have international and moral obligations, but we also have to expect help from our neighbours, and not blind eyes. This problem won't be solved alone, and bickering won't help. How to stop the trafficking gangs seems critical, and we can't do that from here. I watched some of Newsnight on the evening that that large group drowned. There was an ex head of the Border Force there, on the harbourside in Dover, who was convinced we need to move to Australian style offshore processing, which sorted out their problem. However, the more the conversation went on, the less credible this seemed. Where could we take them? As it apparently takes a very long time for the processing, there would need to be huge facilities available. If I heard correctly as around 75% establish refugee status, what would be the point? So I really don't know how we move forward and don't envy those who have to decide how we try. Very good post WE. I did not see Newsnight but if it was Tony Smith speaking, he is excellent Edited by Spiderman (30 Nov 2021 8.44am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Very good post WE. I did not see Newsnight but if it was Tony Smith speaking, he is excellent Edited by Spiderman (30 Nov 2021 8.44am) Yes, we can, probably more than we both know. fingers crossed for tonight!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
I read in the FT in the last day or two, some reporter had interviewed a couple of migrants living on the northern French coast, asking why they were so determined to get to the UK. The consensus seemed to be that the French (and other countries they'd been through) treated them so badly, it was tantamount to forcing them to move onto their nearest neighbour,...the end stop being the UK. Probably not the whole story, but there were enough similar responses to 'get a vibe' at their treatment Edited by Forest Hillbilly (30 Nov 2021 12.35pm) I mention this before, a friend is a Social Anthropologist and as she married a guy from Nigeria (she is white) and they have kids she has taken a professional interest in migrants. She has also had 2 books published and was a prominent Windrush protestor, basically she if a fully paid up member of the Lefty party. Anyway she is currently undertaking a study of migrant lives in Paris and as much as it most have pained her she says that the French treat them appallingly compared to us. She is not a fan of Boris either but the French are far worse. Make of that what you will.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
I mention this before, a friend is a Social Anthropologist and as she married a guy from Nigeria (she is white) and they have kids she has taken a professional interest in migrants. She has also had 2 books published and was a prominent Windrush protestor, basically she if a fully paid up member of the Lefty party. Anyway she is currently undertaking a study of migrant lives in Paris and as much as it most have pained her she says that the French treat them appallingly compared to us. She is not a fan of Boris either but the French are far worse. Make of that what you will. She thinks we treat people better and she is a prominent Windrush protester? Some of them have died waiting for their compensation only 5% actually have got any.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
She thinks we treat people better and she is a prominent Windrush protester? Some of them have died waiting for their compensation only 5% actually have got any. Try looking on the streets of Paris and especially the Muslim ghettos on the outskirts. Like I said she is not a fan how we treat migrants (I disagree of course) never the less her research tells her that the French are far worse which is why they wont to come here.
One more point |
|
|
Hurty comments between mates is full on racism in England. In France cattle prods, curfews and camps aren't racist - just fine.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
She has also had 2 books published and was a prominent Windrush protestor, basically she if a fully paid up member of the Lefty party.
Lots of research grant money to be chased, for sure. Social Anthropology ? what lessons did it find when a large number of young men all arrive into a new territory ? The Viking Era was interesting Social Anthropology.
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
What is the current location of the survivors mobile phone, it will have the record. In making this claim, he is also saying the smugglers are out to kill him.
It looks very much like our survivor did indeed call HM Coastguard emergency number from the sinking boat. Huge flap going on denying everything but the phone records will not lie.
|
|
|
Here is an example of what I have been saying, about how difficult it is to remove those that arrive with no documentation.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Here is an example of what I have been saying, about how difficult it is to remove those that arrive with no documentation. I think most migrants realise that if they can get here the chances of them being deported are very low indeed. Complete joke of our system it is time to quit the EHR court and the legislation that Blair passed have our own laws passed by Parliament.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
one of the countries in Eastern Europe had refugees on its Easterly borders, refugees looking to enter the country. so the refugees were put onto buses and sent across the country and wished good luck and bon voyage into the West. Was that Poland or Slovakia.....can anybody remember ? The refugees were allowed pass through the country but not to stay. Maybe today that is what the French are doing ? They have been doing it for years, as have the Italians. Italy used to issue them with a paper allowing them to pass through only and they had to do so within 7 days
|
|
|
Originally posted by Palace Old Geezer
Well, if the French can't (won't) stop 'em, perhaps the Navy can. It's about time we took a tougher stance. Call me cynical but I don't see the Royal Navy towing boats back to France. I doubt the government has the balls to put up with the flack.
One more point |
|
| croydon proud |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
I see Piti Patel's latest whizz to stop the boat people, the Home Office will no longer issue daily figures. Well it worked for law and order, if you stop counting something the problem goes away. Sigh. It"s a great idea by Priti, better than the giant hairdryer to blow the dingys back to France anyway! The added bonus is it will give those dingy watch folk an added purpose in life- bit like trainspotters but dingys, log boats coming over, numbers, sex, whats not to like?
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.