This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
Fair enough,other than the "any rational" bit.My error.I had wrongly assumed from your anti Khan posts you supported Goldsmith.I should have remembered your penchant for UKIP. If any one still doubts the bilge that epitomises Goldsmith's Lynton Crosby-run campaign,see the views of Tory activist,Shazia Awan I thought you'd like Peter, given that he is the only gay candidate and is into culture. Would have thought he is your secret dirty right wing fantasy. Like the Big Mac meal I bet you have every now and again, despite your public protestations on the evil of McDonalds.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
legaleagle ![]() |
|
---|---|
Does your fiancee know you are such a flirt,Matthew? Think I'd settle for Putin's girlfriend as my right wing fantasy should the need arise for one.But thanks for thinking about me when you turn your mind (as you seemingly do) to Peter and fantasies. Funnily enough,had my not at all irregular quarter pounder with cheese meal (as opposed to a Big Mac)only yesterday after the game Edited by legaleagle (18 Apr 2016 10.33pm)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Pussay Patrol ![]() |
|
---|---|
Decided never to vote labour or cons, I detest this bankrupt political ideology which pins itself to a non existent class system
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
Does your fiancee know you are such a flirt,Matthew? Think I'd settle for Putin's girlfriend as my right wing fantasy should the need arise for one.But thanks for thinking about me when you turn your mind (as you seemingly do) to Peter and fantasies. Funnily enough,had my not at all irregular quarter pounder with cheese meal (as opposed to a Big Mac)only yesterday after the game Edited by legaleagle (18 Apr 2016 10.33pm) Be fair Legal, I wasn't far away from the truth.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
legaleagle ![]() |
|
---|---|
Well, ok,...in the same way that in the big scheme of things elephants and hamsters both have four legs... One person's Big Mac is another's Quarter Pounder, Matthew
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Are you going to post up the seedy and dubious tactics Goldsmith is using then? Or just keep linking to articles you want to get more hits?
Optimistic as ever |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by JHB
Disappointingly there don't appear to be many comedy* candidates standing. The best I can find is somebody standing for the "Cannabis is safer than alcohol" party. I miss the days of the "Party Party", the "No Food Out of Context Party" and the incomparable "Monster Raving Looney Party". *I accept may people will regard quite a few of the candidates as 'comedy' Politics has become so laughable that it's not beyond comprehension that something like the Monster Raving Looney Party would have a decent chance this time around. Call it the Boaty McBoatface effect.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
legaleagle ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Stuk
Are you going to post up the seedy and dubious tactics Goldsmith is using then?
Edited by legaleagle (19 Apr 2016 8.35pm)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
Edited by legaleagle (19 Apr 2016 8.35pm) Aren't they the same links? I really don't know what your point is unless you post it?
Optimistic as ever |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
legaleagle ![]() |
|
---|---|
If you actually read the links you would see (as I said in my post) that one was a link I posted yesterday.The other wasn't. If you read them,you might get my point (even if you disagree).If you don't get it having done that,I can't help you further.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
If you actually read the links you would see (as I said in my post) that one was a link I posted yesterday.The other wasn't. If you read them,you might get my point (even if you disagree).If you don't get it having done that,I can't help you further. I read the initial two and requested you make your point, rather than post links. You've responded by posting more links, so who doesn't "get it?
Optimistic as ever |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This is all a bit backwards. Goldsmith maintains that he shouldn't have his comments on Khan's association with terror sympathisers dismissed on the grounds racism. A week later Cameron is the racist for branding a radical cleric and former Conservative member 'dangerous'. That's the Guardian's angle FFS. Perhaps he's beyond reproach because they're Toryist.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.