This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Not far off attended the Independent Reigate Grammar, followed by University of Leeds and St Edmund Hall Oxford. FFS NOOOOO Attended the VOLUNTARY AIDED Reigate Grammar. Why do you keep ignoring the facts?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
FFS NOOOOO Attended the VOLUNTARY AIDED Reigate Grammar. Why do you keep ignoring the facts? Which became an independent fee paying grammar school in 1976 while he was there. Facts, eh?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Which became an independent fee paying grammar school in 1976 while he was there. Facts, eh? So what? He didn't come from an advantaged background he was just bright. Trying to make out he is more Tory than a Tory is BS, he doesn't come from a wealthy family that is trying to hold onto its advantages. He is just clever, whether or not that makes you jealous.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
So what? He didn't come from an advantaged background he was just bright. Trying to make out he is more Tory than a Tory is BS, he doesn't come from a wealthy family that is trying to hold onto its advantages. He is just clever, whether or not that makes you jealous. Makes you angry though apparently.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
So what? He didn't come from an advantaged background he was just bright. Trying to make out he is more Tory than a Tory is BS, he doesn't come from a wealthy family that is trying to hold onto its advantages. He is just clever, whether or not that makes you jealous. Doesn’t make me anymore jealous than I am of someone who went to Eton.
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Makes you angry though apparently. What a silly comment. If he wanted to be a Tory he would be one. Why did you bet Matthew, is that someone to whom you really want to give money?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Which became an independent fee paying grammar school in 1976 while he was there. Facts, eh? I know someone who was at Manchester Grammar when it went from direct grant and it was only the new cohort who paid after it went independent - Reigate may have been the same. You can't hold it against the kid where they went to school though.
|
|
|
Originally posted by chris123
I know someone who was at Manchester Grammar when it went from direct grant and it was only the new cohort who paid after it went independent - Reigate may have been the same. You can't hold it against the kid where they went to school though. If you were in before it went fee paying you were paid for, end of. Happened to me too
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
True but that wasn't something that formed part of his duties as deputy leader of the Labour party You're obviously right in saying that; I just saw an opportunity to have a go at Watson. He made an almighty error, and as far as I know he's never uttered a word of contrition or apology. I didn't know Corbyn had nominated him for an honour, but I've thought for years that that whole system stinks anyway.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
If you were in before it went fee paying you were paid for, end of. Happened to me too You mean you didn’t go to a comprehensive school ?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
You mean you didn’t go to a comprehensive school ? Massively middle class. Just like most people including Keir Starmer. Nowt wrong with that. What annoys me is when the Labour Party bangs on and on about we are here for the Working Class. A whole 14% of British society. I took my 11+ at Ashburton Juniors if that makes you feel better though. Edited by Mapletree (08 Apr 2020 5.39pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Massively middle class. Just like most people including Keir Starmer. Nowt wrong with that. What annoys me is when the Labour Party bangs on and on about we are here for the Working Class. A whole 14% of British society. I took my 11+ at Ashburton Juniors if that makes you feel better though. Edited by Mapletree (08 Apr 2020 5.39pm) Not at all. Wish I’d had the opportunity instead of getting my schooling at a holding pen for unconvicted felons.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Massively middle class. Just like most people including Keir Starmer. Nowt wrong with that. What annoys me is when the Labour Party bangs on and on about we are here for the Working Class. A whole 14% of British society. I took my 11+ at Ashburton Juniors if that makes you feel better though. Edited by Mapletree (08 Apr 2020 5.39pm) Who is that 14% made up of? I’m surprised there’s only 14% considered working class households, although there will be however many non working households. Some jobs may require staff to put on a £120 suit but it’s modern day working class imo, if you’re looking at it in respect or pay. You then get scaffolders on more than managers in advertising etc. You can’t carry on in some physical jobs for ever and neither can you in advertising but you can in some. Accountancy, law. Qualified professions that don’t rely on age, new ideas as much as occupations with no barriers to entry such as exams. Edited by Rudi Hedman (09 Apr 2020 11.14am)
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Not at all. Wish I’d had the opportunity instead of getting my schooling at a holding pen for unconvicted felons. You did go to Eton then?
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Not at all. Wish I’d had the opportunity instead of getting my schooling at a holding pen for unconvicted felons. Had an interesting discussion with my Daughter about schooling. She is at a good University (in the top 10 nationwide and top 5 for her particular degree course and yes I am inordainately proud of her for getting there) and amongst her floormates (10 or so), only her and one other girl went to a state comprehensive with the rest attending either private or ultra-selective grammar/religious schools. Now her school was not a bad one and it is, as I understand how these things work, the top non-selective state school in the borough. She had a good time there and suffered nothing bad but she is amazed at how all the others she now lives with, apart from the other girl who attended a similar school to her in a different part of the country, express a real sense of affection about their schooling. A bond almost that she struggles to get her head around. She went to her school, worked and played hard and achieved what she set out to do. But she feels no particular affinity to it now. Not quite indifference but neither does she have any sense of identity from being there. A huge difference in mindset is how she put it. Never really thought about schooling in those terms before. And that is where the state comprehensive system is so badly served. Functionality above all else. Now my kid is bright. No point beating around the bush about it and comes from a supportive family and would do well in any environment. I say that without boastfulness, just stating it as fact. But for kids who do struggle with the books? Or lack her natural competetive spirit? Socialism destroyed our Grammer school system purely for purposes of ideology. And as per usual, it was those who could least afford to be the playthings of Left-wing scum who pay the price.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
You did go to Eton then? No, mine was an earthier establishment. Must have been good, it was approved after all.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
What a silly comment. If he wanted to be a Tory he would be one. Why did you bet Matthew, is that someone to whom you really want to give money? You dont remember you bet with Matthew Kelly then.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Matov
Had an interesting discussion with my Daughter about schooling. She is at a good University (in the top 10 nationwide and top 5 for her particular degree course and yes I am inordainately proud of her for getting there) and amongst her floormates (10 or so), only her and one other girl went to a state comprehensive with the rest attending either private or ultra-selective grammar/religious schools. Now her school was not a bad one and it is, as I understand how these things work, the top non-selective state school in the borough. She had a good time there and suffered nothing bad but she is amazed at how all the others she now lives with, apart from the other girl who attended a similar school to her in a different part of the country, express a real sense of affection about their schooling. A bond almost that she struggles to get her head around. She went to her school, worked and played hard and achieved what she set out to do. But she feels no particular affinity to it now. Not quite indifference but neither does she have any sense of identity from being there. A huge difference in mindset is how she put it. Never really thought about schooling in those terms before. And that is where the state comprehensive system is so badly served. Functionality above all else. Now my kid is bright. No point beating around the bush about it and comes from a supportive family and would do well in any environment. I say that without boastfulness, just stating it as fact. But for kids who do struggle with the books? Or lack her natural competetive spirit? Socialism destroyed our Grammer school system purely for purposes of ideology. And as per usual, it was those who could least afford to be the playthings of Left-wing scum who pay the price. Cue danh
|
|
|
Originally posted by Matov
Had an interesting discussion with my Daughter about schooling. She is at a good University (in the top 10 nationwide and top 5 for her particular degree course and yes I am inordainately proud of her for getting there) and amongst her floormates (10 or so), only her and one other girl went to a state comprehensive with the rest attending either private or ultra-selective grammar/religious schools. Now her school was not a bad one and it is, as I understand how these things work, the top non-selective state school in the borough. She had a good time there and suffered nothing bad but she is amazed at how all the others she now lives with, apart from the other girl who attended a similar school to her in a different part of the country, express a real sense of affection about their schooling. A bond almost that she struggles to get her head around. She went to her school, worked and played hard and achieved what she set out to do. But she feels no particular affinity to it now. Not quite indifference but neither does she have any sense of identity from being there. A huge difference in mindset is how she put it. Never really thought about schooling in those terms before. And that is where the state comprehensive system is so badly served. Functionality above all else. Now my kid is bright. No point beating around the bush about it and comes from a supportive family and would do well in any environment. I say that without boastfulness, just stating it as fact. But for kids who do struggle with the books? Or lack her natural competetive spirit? Socialism destroyed our Grammer school system purely for purposes of ideology. And as per usual, it was those who could least afford to be the playthings of Left-wing scum who pay the price. Fair play to her. Sounds as though she’ll do well in life.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.