You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Sir Keir Starmer
November 13 2026 7.11am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Sir Keir Starmer


Page 4 of 39 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >
Mapletree Flag Croydon 08 Apr 20 1.26pm

Originally posted by Spiderman

Not far off attended the Independent Reigate Grammar, followed by University of Leeds and St Edmund Hall Oxford.
As I said more Tory than many Tories

FFS NOOOOO

Attended the VOLUNTARY AIDED Reigate Grammar.

Why do you keep ignoring the facts?

 

Teddy Eagle Flag 08 Apr 20 1.41pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

FFS NOOOOO

Attended the VOLUNTARY AIDED Reigate Grammar.

Why do you keep ignoring the facts?

Which became an independent fee paying grammar school in 1976 while he was there. Facts, eh?

 

Mapletree Flag Croydon 08 Apr 20 1.43pm

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Which became an independent fee paying grammar school in 1976 while he was there. Facts, eh?

So what? He didn't come from an advantaged background he was just bright. Trying to make out he is more Tory than a Tory is BS, he doesn't come from a wealthy family that is trying to hold onto its advantages. He is just clever, whether or not that makes you jealous.

 

cryrst Flag The garden of England 08 Apr 20 1.55pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

So what? He didn't come from an advantaged background he was just bright. Trying to make out he is more Tory than a Tory is BS, he doesn't come from a wealthy family that is trying to hold onto its advantages. He is just clever, whether or not that makes you jealous.

Makes you angry though apparently.
You know what they say about truth!
He really wants to be a tory though I bet Matthew.

 

Teddy Eagle Flag 08 Apr 20 1.57pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

So what? He didn't come from an advantaged background he was just bright. Trying to make out he is more Tory than a Tory is BS, he doesn't come from a wealthy family that is trying to hold onto its advantages. He is just clever, whether or not that makes you jealous.

Doesn’t make me anymore jealous than I am of someone who went to Eton.

 

Mapletree Flag Croydon 08 Apr 20 2.01pm

Originally posted by cryrst

Makes you angry though apparently.
You know what they say about truth!
He really wants to be a tory though I bet Matthew.

What a silly comment. If he wanted to be a Tory he would be one. Why did you bet Matthew, is that someone to whom you really want to give money?

 

chris123 Flag hove actually 08 Apr 20 2.17pm

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Which became an independent fee paying grammar school in 1976 while he was there. Facts, eh?

I know someone who was at Manchester Grammar when it went from direct grant and it was only the new cohort who paid after it went independent - Reigate may have been the same. You can't hold it against the kid where they went to school though.

 

Mapletree Flag Croydon 08 Apr 20 2.18pm

Originally posted by chris123

I know someone who was at Manchester Grammar when it went from direct grant and it was only the new cohort who paid after it went independent - Reigate may have been the same. You can't hold it against the kid where they went to school though.

If you were in before it went fee paying you were paid for, end of. Happened to me too

 

Matov Flag 08 Apr 20 3.22pm

The issue with Starmer is just that he is seriously lacking in political nous. His pushing of Labours disastrous Brexit stance in the December 2019 GE in the face of overwhelming evidence that it would be disastrous for Labour is the absolute proof of that.

And given that Labour only have one issue to focus on between now and the 2024 if they want to win a GE is to persuade a leave supporting England that they have their best interests at heart, his lack of understanding of what England wants means he is simply not worthy of leading a major political party. He is just froth. No substance.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

JRW2 Flag Dulwich 08 Apr 20 3.31pm

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

True but that wasn't something that formed part of his duties as deputy leader of the Labour party

You're obviously right in saying that; I just saw an opportunity to have a go at Watson. He made an almighty error, and as far as I know he's never uttered a word of contrition or apology. I didn't know Corbyn had nominated him for an honour, but I've thought for years that that whole system stinks anyway.

 

Teddy Eagle Flag 08 Apr 20 5.33pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

If you were in before it went fee paying you were paid for, end of. Happened to me too

You mean you didn’t go to a comprehensive school ?
That’s a bit elitist.

 

Mapletree Flag Croydon 08 Apr 20 5.37pm

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

You mean you didn’t go to a comprehensive school ?
That’s a bit elitist.

Massively middle class. Just like most people including Keir Starmer. Nowt wrong with that. What annoys me is when the Labour Party bangs on and on about we are here for the Working Class. A whole 14% of British society.

I took my 11+ at Ashburton Juniors if that makes you feel better though.

Edited by Mapletree (08 Apr 2020 5.39pm)

 

Teddy Eagle Flag 08 Apr 20 6.34pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

Massively middle class. Just like most people including Keir Starmer. Nowt wrong with that. What annoys me is when the Labour Party bangs on and on about we are here for the Working Class. A whole 14% of British society.

I took my 11+ at Ashburton Juniors if that makes you feel better though.

Edited by Mapletree (08 Apr 2020 5.39pm)

Not at all. Wish I’d had the opportunity instead of getting my schooling at a holding pen for unconvicted felons.

 

Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 09 Apr 20 11.07am

Originally posted by Mapletree

Massively middle class. Just like most people including Keir Starmer. Nowt wrong with that. What annoys me is when the Labour Party bangs on and on about we are here for the Working Class. A whole 14% of British society.

I took my 11+ at Ashburton Juniors if that makes you feel better though.

Edited by Mapletree (08 Apr 2020 5.39pm)

Who is that 14% made up of?

I’m surprised there’s only 14% considered working class households, although there will be however many non working households.

Some jobs may require staff to put on a £120 suit but it’s modern day working class imo, if you’re looking at it in respect or pay. You then get scaffolders on more than managers in advertising etc. You can’t carry on in some physical jobs for ever and neither can you in advertising but you can in some. Accountancy, law. Qualified professions that don’t rely on age, new ideas as much as occupations with no barriers to entry such as exams.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (09 Apr 2020 11.14am)

 


COYP

Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 09 Apr 20 11.15am

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Not at all. Wish I’d had the opportunity instead of getting my schooling at a holding pen for unconvicted felons.

You did go to Eton then?

 


COYP

Matov Flag 09 Apr 20 11.25am

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Not at all. Wish I’d had the opportunity instead of getting my schooling at a holding pen for unconvicted felons.

Had an interesting discussion with my Daughter about schooling. She is at a good University (in the top 10 nationwide and top 5 for her particular degree course and yes I am inordainately proud of her for getting there) and amongst her floormates (10 or so), only her and one other girl went to a state comprehensive with the rest attending either private or ultra-selective grammar/religious schools.

Now her school was not a bad one and it is, as I understand how these things work, the top non-selective state school in the borough. She had a good time there and suffered nothing bad but she is amazed at how all the others she now lives with, apart from the other girl who attended a similar school to her in a different part of the country, express a real sense of affection about their schooling. A bond almost that she struggles to get her head around.

She went to her school, worked and played hard and achieved what she set out to do. But she feels no particular affinity to it now. Not quite indifference but neither does she have any sense of identity from being there.

A huge difference in mindset is how she put it.

Never really thought about schooling in those terms before. And that is where the state comprehensive system is so badly served. Functionality above all else.

Now my kid is bright. No point beating around the bush about it and comes from a supportive family and would do well in any environment. I say that without boastfulness, just stating it as fact. But for kids who do struggle with the books? Or lack her natural competetive spirit?

Socialism destroyed our Grammer school system purely for purposes of ideology. And as per usual, it was those who could least afford to be the playthings of Left-wing scum who pay the price.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Teddy Eagle Flag 09 Apr 20 11.27am

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

You did go to Eton then?

No, mine was an earthier establishment. Must have been good, it was approved after all.
Spike Milligan in one of his books had this exchange between a squaddie and an officer.
“Ere sir, where’d you get that accent?”
“Eton, old sausage”
“Well I’d stop eating old sausages”.

 

cryrst Flag The garden of England 09 Apr 20 11.27am

Originally posted by Mapletree

What a silly comment. If he wanted to be a Tory he would be one. Why did you bet Matthew, is that someone to whom you really want to give money?

You dont remember you bet with Matthew Kelly then.
As for being a silly comment that's your opinion the same as it was mine to say it. If you look at politics the centre left is very close to the centre right and starmer is centre left. Nearly a tory.
I went to trash burton senior school. Left just before it came bottom in a report uk wide. I was there when we did the rowntree festival ad. Not so much as a chocolate for my fame.
I remember mr Barlow (loved his stocks and shares)
Mrs dennison (looked dirty even to me back then)
Mr tufnell (the gay head master)
Mr Jones the PE boss (or mr angry as my mate found out on day one)
And poor adrian tassy RIP.
My long term memory is spot on but short term I'm a bit lax. That must be normal

 

cryrst Flag The garden of England 09 Apr 20 11.29am

Originally posted by Matov

Had an interesting discussion with my Daughter about schooling. She is at a good University (in the top 10 nationwide and top 5 for her particular degree course and yes I am inordainately proud of her for getting there) and amongst her floormates (10 or so), only her and one other girl went to a state comprehensive with the rest attending either private or ultra-selective grammar/religious schools.

Now her school was not a bad one and it is, as I understand how these things work, the top non-selective state school in the borough. She had a good time there and suffered nothing bad but she is amazed at how all the others she now lives with, apart from the other girl who attended a similar school to her in a different part of the country, express a real sense of affection about their schooling. A bond almost that she struggles to get her head around.

She went to her school, worked and played hard and achieved what she set out to do. But she feels no particular affinity to it now. Not quite indifference but neither does she have any sense of identity from being there.

A huge difference in mindset is how she put it.

Never really thought about schooling in those terms before. And that is where the state comprehensive system is so badly served. Functionality above all else.

Now my kid is bright. No point beating around the bush about it and comes from a supportive family and would do well in any environment. I say that without boastfulness, just stating it as fact. But for kids who do struggle with the books? Or lack her natural competetive spirit?

Socialism destroyed our Grammer school system purely for purposes of ideology. And as per usual, it was those who could least afford to be the playthings of Left-wing scum who pay the price.

Cue danh

 

Teddy Eagle Flag 09 Apr 20 11.37am

Originally posted by Matov

Had an interesting discussion with my Daughter about schooling. She is at a good University (in the top 10 nationwide and top 5 for her particular degree course and yes I am inordainately proud of her for getting there) and amongst her floormates (10 or so), only her and one other girl went to a state comprehensive with the rest attending either private or ultra-selective grammar/religious schools.

Now her school was not a bad one and it is, as I understand how these things work, the top non-selective state school in the borough. She had a good time there and suffered nothing bad but she is amazed at how all the others she now lives with, apart from the other girl who attended a similar school to her in a different part of the country, express a real sense of affection about their schooling. A bond almost that she struggles to get her head around.

She went to her school, worked and played hard and achieved what she set out to do. But she feels no particular affinity to it now. Not quite indifference but neither does she have any sense of identity from being there.

A huge difference in mindset is how she put it.

Never really thought about schooling in those terms before. And that is where the state comprehensive system is so badly served. Functionality above all else.

Now my kid is bright. No point beating around the bush about it and comes from a supportive family and would do well in any environment. I say that without boastfulness, just stating it as fact. But for kids who do struggle with the books? Or lack her natural competetive spirit?

Socialism destroyed our Grammer school system purely for purposes of ideology. And as per usual, it was those who could least afford to be the playthings of Left-wing scum who pay the price.

Fair play to her. Sounds as though she’ll do well in life.
I don’t envy the young now: when I was at school there was no expectation of going to university, I don’t remember it even being mentioned so there wasn’t that pressure and jobs were available anyway.
In any case everyone I knew was expected to start earning to bring some money into the house. A lot of kids left at Easter before the exams knowing they didn’t need any qualifications.

 

Page 4 of 39 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Sir Keir Starmer