You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Who is English?
November 12 2026 8.52am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Who is English?


Page 4 of 19 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 15 Jun 24 5.54pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Who's expecting that? I, for instance, regard myself as both British and English. Some though seem to think I am only partly English.

Were you outraged by that Maradona goal?

 


Red and Blue Army!

Teddy Eagle Flag 15 Jun 24 6.06pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Who's expecting that? I, for instance, regard myself as both British and English. Some though seem to think I am only partly English.

Fair enough. Better than claiming to be a European.

 

orpingtoneagle Flag Orpington 15 Jun 24 6.10pm

I used to manage a team based in Edinburgh so used to spend a few nights up there every month.

Used to love the mostly Americans visiting 'home,' and getting carried off being 'Scotch,' mind you some of the most passionate Irishmen I have ever met have never set foot outside New York

 

Ouzo Dan Flag Behind you 15 Jun 24 7.35pm

What started all this is this post by Wisbech.

"There is no such thing as an English nationality. It doesn’t exist. We are all British citizens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Great Britain comprising the countries of England, Scotland and Wales.

Nothing other than culture makes you English, Scottish or Welsh. Every one of them is a British national"

English ethnicity like Scottish, Welsh & Irish runs deeper than culture, England being an island nation largely left alone for thousands of years leads to unique genetic mutations within its population a classic case study in this are the Sherpas of the Himalayas, their isolation & exposure to higher altitudes gives them traits exclusive to them

See below courtesy of Google AI

Himalayan people unique genetics
The Himalayan region is home to several ethnic groups, including the Sherpas, who are renowned for their exceptional adaptability to high-altitude environments. Research has shed light on the unique genetic characteristics of the Himalayan people, which have evolved to enable them to thrive in these challenging environments.

mtDNA Sub-Haplogroups

Studies have identified two common mtDNA sub-haplogroups unique to Sherpa populations: Haplogroup A15c1 and Haplogroup C4a3b1. These haplogroups are thought to have originated from East Asian populations and have been shaped by natural selection to adapt to high-altitude environments.

Genetic Adaptations

The Himalayan people have developed several genetic adaptations to cope with the low oxygen levels at high altitudes. These adaptations include:

Unique Hemoglobin-Binding Capacity: The Himalayan people have a higher affinity for hemoglobin, which allows them to extract more oxygen from the air at high altitudes.
Doubled Nitric Oxide Production: The Himalayan people have a higher production of nitric oxide, which helps to dilate blood vessels and increase oxygen delivery to the body’s tissues.
Genetic Continuity

Research has also shown that the Himalayan region was colonized by East Asians of likely high-altitude origin, followed by millennia of genetic continuity. This genetic continuity has allowed the Himalayan people to maintain their unique genetic characteristics over time.

Recent Tibetan Ancestry

A study published in 2015 found genetic evidence of a recent Tibetan ancestry to Sherpas in the Himalayan region. This suggests that the Sherpa people have a recent genetic connection to the Tibetan plateau, which has contributed to their unique genetic characteristics.

Conclusion

The Himalayan people’s unique genetics have evolved to enable them to thrive in high-altitude environments. Their mtDNA sub-haplogroups, genetic adaptations, and genetic continuity have all contributed to their exceptional ability to adapt to these challenging environments. Further research is needed to fully understand the complexities of the Himalayan people’s genetics and how they have evolved to inhabit this unique region.

Ethnicity is exclusionary & there is nothing wrong with that.

 


The mountains are calling & I must go.

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 15 Jun 24 8.36pm

Originally posted by georgenorman

All this nonsense that there are no English, just people and no white people, etc, is the same mindset that says there are no men or women, just people. Presumably there are no Crystal Palace fans - just football fans.

Of course there are English people! I am one, as presumably are you. Some here think I am not because I had a French born grandmother. Who became as English as me.

It’s how you define being English that’s disputed. With the DNA argument comprehensively destroyed as nonsense it’s obviously how you feel and not about how others feel about you.

It’s no different with men and women. Most have no doubt at all about their sexuality. You are getting confused about those whose physical appearance doesn’t match the way they feel.

Those here are all, presumably, Crystal Palace fans.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 15 Jun 24 8.37pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Who's expecting that? I, for instance, regard myself as both British and English. Some though seem to think I am only partly English.

You have a French grandmother. Simply expressed, you are a quarter French.
How many genes you actually inherited from your grandmother is another matter. It could be approximately 18% to 31%.

If you prefer to ignore your French heritage, then that is up to you. You do like to ignore reality when it suits you, after all.

Don't worry, being a quarter French doesn't stop you being 'English'. Of course, if by some twist of fate you had been born in France, according to your logic, you would be French.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (15 Jun 2024 8.39pm)

 

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 15 Jun 24 8.38pm

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Fair enough. Better than claiming to be a European.

I am also that. As you and almost everyone here are.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Teddy Eagle Flag 15 Jun 24 8.41pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I am also that. As you and almost everyone here are.

Why draw the line there? Just say we're all carbon based lifeforms and leave it at that.

 

Ouzo Dan Flag Behind you 15 Jun 24 8.44pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Of course there are English people! I am one, as presumably are you. Some here think I am not because I had a French born grandmother. Who became as English as me.

It’s how you define being English that’s disputed. With the DNA argument comprehensively destroyed as nonsense it’s obviously how you feel and not about how others feel about you.

It’s no different with men and women. Most have no doubt at all about their sexuality. You are getting confused about those whose physical appearance doesn’t match the way they feel.

Those here are all, presumably, Crystal Palace fans.

-.-'

You're not the first socialist to deny science in favour of feelings my quarter french troll.

 


The mountains are calling & I must go.

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 15 Jun 24 9.05pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

You have a French grandmother. Simply expressed, you are a quarter French.
How many genes you actually inherited from your grandmother is another matter. It could be approximately 18% to 31%.

If you prefer to ignore your French heritage, then that is up to you. You do like to ignore reality when it suits you, after all.

Don't worry, being a quarter French doesn't stop you being 'English'. Of course, if by some twist of fate you had been born in France, according to your logic, you would be French.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (15 Jun 2024 8.39pm)

This is completely twisted logic. Being born in France won’t make you French unless one of your parents are French. You can become French at 13 if you have lived there since birth. In other words been exposed to and accepted the culture. No DNA involved.

I am English not because I was born here. I have British citizenship because of that. I am English because I grew up here with English parents, went to school here and learned to appreciate our culture and heritage. I didn’t even know my grandmother was born in France until a few years ago. No DNA involved.

I am 100% English. My DNA, like yours, has no bearing on it. It’s how I feel. Not how you, or anyone else, feels about me.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 15 Jun 24 9.09pm

Originally posted by Ouzo Dan

-.-'

You're not the first socialist to deny science in favour of feelings my quarter french troll.

Wrong in every assertion. I am not a socialist. I never deny science. A am not a quarter French. I am 100% English with genes as garbled as everyone else. Genes don’t dictate how you feel.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 15 Jun 24 9.14pm

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Why draw the line there? Just say we're all carbon based lifeforms and leave it at that.

Carbon based life forms tend not to be restricted to specific regions so would not add a lot of understanding. European is about as far as you can go with this.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 15 Jun 24 9.15pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

This is completely twisted logic. Being born in France won’t make you French unless one of your parents are French. You can become French at 13 if you have lived there since birth. In other words been exposed to and accepted the culture. No DNA involved.

I am English not because I was born here. I have British citizenship because of that. I am English because I grew up here with English parents, went to school here and learned to appreciate our culture and heritage. I didn’t even know my grandmother was born in France until a few years ago. No DNA involved.

I am 100% English. My DNA, like yours, has no bearing on it. It’s how I feel. Not how you, or anyone else, feels about me.

So if you are born here but don't have English or British parent(s), you can't be British or English?

Thank you for confirming.

You are a quarter French. Accept it. It is a fact.

I don't have a problem accepting my genetic heritage. That's because I accept reality.

 

Teddy Eagle Flag 15 Jun 24 9.20pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Carbon based life forms tend not to be restricted to specific regions so would not add a lot of understanding. European is about as far as you can go with this.

Whereas Icelanders and Italians are indistinguishable.

 

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 15 Jun 24 9.23pm

Originally posted by Ouzo Dan

What started all this is this post by Wisbech.

"There is no such thing as an English nationality. It doesn’t exist. We are all British citizens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Great Britain comprising the countries of England, Scotland and Wales.

Nothing other than culture makes you English, Scottish or Welsh. Every one of them is a British national"

English ethnicity like Scottish, Welsh & Irish runs deeper than culture, England being an island nation largely left alone for thousands of years leads to unique genetic mutations within its population a classic case study in this are the Sherpas of the Himalayas, their isolation & exposure to higher altitudes gives them traits exclusive to them

See below courtesy of Google AI

Himalayan people unique genetics
The Himalayan region is home to several ethnic groups, including the Sherpas, who are renowned for their exceptional adaptability to high-altitude environments. Research has shed light on the unique genetic characteristics of the Himalayan people, which have evolved to enable them to thrive in these challenging environments.

mtDNA Sub-Haplogroups

Studies have identified two common mtDNA sub-haplogroups unique to Sherpa populations: Haplogroup A15c1 and Haplogroup C4a3b1. These haplogroups are thought to have originated from East Asian populations and have been shaped by natural selection to adapt to high-altitude environments.

Genetic Adaptations

The Himalayan people have developed several genetic adaptations to cope with the low oxygen levels at high altitudes. These adaptations include:

Unique Hemoglobin-Binding Capacity: The Himalayan people have a higher affinity for hemoglobin, which allows them to extract more oxygen from the air at high altitudes.
Doubled Nitric Oxide Production: The Himalayan people have a higher production of nitric oxide, which helps to dilate blood vessels and increase oxygen delivery to the body’s tissues.
Genetic Continuity

Research has also shown that the Himalayan region was colonized by East Asians of likely high-altitude origin, followed by millennia of genetic continuity. This genetic continuity has allowed the Himalayan people to maintain their unique genetic characteristics over time.

Recent Tibetan Ancestry

A study published in 2015 found genetic evidence of a recent Tibetan ancestry to Sherpas in the Himalayan region. This suggests that the Sherpa people have a recent genetic connection to the Tibetan plateau, which has contributed to their unique genetic characteristics.

Conclusion

The Himalayan people’s unique genetics have evolved to enable them to thrive in high-altitude environments. Their mtDNA sub-haplogroups, genetic adaptations, and genetic continuity have all contributed to their exceptional ability to adapt to these challenging environments. Further research is needed to fully understand the complexities of the Himalayan people’s genetics and how they have evolved to inhabit this unique region.

Ethnicity is exclusionary & there is nothing wrong with that.

This will only be true of a closed society with no interbreeding from invading peoples, settlers or travellers returning with new families. Hardly true of the English who have been invaded, settled and travelled extensively.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 15 Jun 24 9.29pm

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Whereas Icelanders and Italians are indistinguishable.

Culturally hugely, of course. Otherwise, not necessarily and certainly not relevantly.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 15 Jun 24 9.37pm

Sherpas and altitude

Italians and wheat

the Irish and Cows milk

Eskimo & heat conservation.

Ethiopians & heat loss.

We are all the product of a few thousand years of evolution. Trouble is, like the Panda bears, when you change their environment there is often trouble.

Some tribal populations of natural athletes suffer with dire Obesity when they left the Mountains and joined the modern World.

Many American Indians got destroyed by alcohol when the white man first invaded their territory.

the English ?
you tell me what is essential to their environment. And what changes could be deleterious.

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 15 Jun 24 9.37pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

So if you are born here but don't have English or British parent(s), you can't be British or English?

Thank you for confirming.

You are a quarter French. Accept it. It is a fact.

I don't have a problem accepting my genetic heritage. That's because I accept reality.

No, that’s the legal position in France as I understand it. Not the emotional one.

Only the emotional one has any relevance to the situation in the UK.

I am 100% English.

If by your twisted logic I am a quarter French, what is King Charles? Will you start advocating for his abdication and begin the search for his replacement with someone with pure English DNA, after first determining what that is exactly? How far back will you go and why?

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Teddy Eagle Flag 15 Jun 24 9.42pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Culturally hugely, of course. Otherwise, not necessarily and certainly not relevantly.

Sure.

[Link]

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 15 Jun 24 9.44pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

This will only be true of a closed society with no interbreeding from invading peoples, settlers or travellers returning with new families. Hardly true of the English who have been invaded, settled and travelled extensively.

No, not extensively or much at all for 1600 years. That bares no comparison to what we are experiencing now.

We have been invaded, but the effect on our genetic make up can be seen by anyone with a laptop or phone to be limited.

The Romans, Vikings, Normans only made a tiny change. The Germanic tribes, your Saxons, Jutes, Angles etc has a bigger effect, back around 400 AD. Their genes represent about 25% to 45% of the modern population. There has been virtually no change since then.

In rural England, if one carries any significant amount of genes beyond original English/Western European, they are most likely to be Scottish or Irish. Needless to say, we are now seeing big changes in the large cities because of the absurd amount of immigration in the last 30 years.

I know you will have to use the phrase, ahem, The Great Replacement Theory'. You can't help it.

 

Page 4 of 19 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Who is English?