I watched it and thought it was more than a little scary. It was just a diatribe of end-to-end conspiracy theories presented with total conviction that this was the unarguable truth. It reminded me of Andrew Torba. If this is what he really believes then I can understand why Fox needed to remove him.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

The idea that things like war, civil liberties, emerging science, demographic change, corporate power and natural resources don't get debated on TV because they aren't "permitted" by the political parties, and their donors, colluding to ban them. Then that the USA looks increasingly like a "one-party state".Then he talks of this being imposed by force.

That's enough, isn't it? These things are discussed regularly. Not maybe in the way he approves of, but that's different. The idea that there is any collusion between the two parties is transparent nonsense. These are nothing but conspiracy theories. Just opinions from a particular view of what might be. Not what is.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Honestly I don't really know what to say here.

Look, there are plenty of people who disagree with Carlson on plenty of stuff who agree with the obvious realities of what you....weirdly call conspiracy theory. Most of it isn't even denied and exists only as word play.

As for 'debate'.....I don't know what you think passes for the word 'debate' today but it seems to only encompass heavily restricted opinions.

Considering the freedom of speech the generation that raised you enjoyed for actual real debates, frankly I find it weird. You are definitely out of synch with most of them on these matters.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

That you don't think they are conspiracy theories is only to be expected, given the kind of sources you use. You are much more aligned with the right in the USA than you are with most of us here, or with reality. The right in the USA are a seriously odd bunch. I have spent time with some of them and although they are often extremely pleasant company it's often very difficult to follow their political logic. Many have no direct experience of other cultures, let alone care that they exist.

So these just aren't "obvious realities"! They are the twisted logic of those with a peculiar mindset.

There is loads of programming, and articles, which examine these issues in depth. Not made by spotty youths behind a camera in their basement but by proper journalists doing research and carrying out interviews. There are ways these then get reviewed and discussed. You won't see them because you reject the MSM as a biased source. Do you not understand that what you claim is being done to us, is actually being done to you. Step back and consider the veracity of the sources you use, and how they can be guaranteed. There is evil at play in the West. Our confidence in our institutions is being undermined. You think that is because those institutions have become rotten. I think someone is feeding you, and those who stoke your fires, those thoughts.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Have you ever been to Russia?

The Soviet system might be officially dead but the types who ran it are still in control. I don't defend the "state" come what may. I defend the truth and common sense and I criticise bs. Any Russian doing that would quickly be in hot water.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

[Tweet Link]

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)