Any criticisms of the leave campaign are balanced out with criticism of the remain campaign. Criticisms of the campaigns that are too loaded on one side are to my mind unbalanced as in truth neither campaign really knows what will happen. Both of them were arguing from an ideological position.

As for interpretations of what the vote meant. I differ significantly from you. I believe your position is just a fall back remain position to attempt to get another referendum....or indeed ignore the original.

There will be a vote upon the final terms in parliament. Polling data shows no call for another referendum...indeed it shows a desire to get on with the process.

Remain parties did not do well in the general election. Claiming the leave position is undemocratic isn't realistic.

I don't support attempts to interfere with the negotiating process by minority parties which can only weaken the UK position. But there are plenty of people who are quite happy to stand with the EU position rather than the UK....But be in no doubt this is very much a minority viewpoint in the UK.

Personally, I see the EU as a disaster waiting to happen and by leaving we are reducing the damage. Two Italian banks have just failed and with the state of southern Europe that's just the tip of the iceberg. The magic EU 'money' tree can't go on endlessly....and once Germany starts to stutter investors will panic and it all comes down.....This isn't something I'm looking forward to but I don't see how it doesn't happen without serious reform.....And the EU doesn't willingly do reform.

Perhaps in the future the UK may join a different type of union....But much water will pass under the bridge first.

Emphasis on British. I'd say the true Yardies would be more aligned with Kingston Jamaica than good old London town.

It was until we over-fished it. And please don't show such naivety in believing that a capitalist Tory government will be 'green' and right-on when it comes to sustainability.

We can't sell our fish to ourselves in the tonnage that would be needed to address any imbalances. We are an island nation but the irony being we are not big native fish eaters save for cod. A huge amount is exported entirely for that reason or ends up as animal feed.

How big is the fish counter at your local big supermarket? Ours is only about 10 feet long. That's the demand. Low.

There were over-fishing problems before the EU, but once we joined the problem went into overdive, as well as destroying the British fishing industry of course. You have faith in a capitalist, undemocratic, price-rigging cartel doing the right thing then? We are a net-importer of fish so plenty of opportunity to reverse that.

It's just your usual anti-British rhetoric - we are incapable of running our own affairs and need those wise and wonderful EU bureaucrats to do it fer us.

That one made me laugh out loud - stay in the EU or we will have dirty streets!

You can't argue because you're ignorant as to how the different economies work.

Well, I guess you are quite prepared to accept enslaving others then when it suits you.

I already know you are happy to destroy social cohesion and accept increased levels of terrorism if it suits your ideals of cultural Marxism.

Just a little note...if you want to go down that road....the German economy....wasn't built upon the Corbyn model.

Hence us actually being able to place restrictions on EU migrants but choosing not to. Anyone who thinks us leaving the EU will result in a magical and substantial decrease in migration has something very different coming to them. Especially with the undeniable economic volatility we're in for over the next however long, but that's okay "we'll be okay in the end".