This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by PatrickA
Kouyate is rarely injured, doesn't carry excess weight and shows no sign of slowing down or lacking fitness. If it is only a year on offer this could easily be a shot in our own foot. It might be Kouyates demands are to high. But all in all to lose a fit , experienced international, who has played a big part for us in both mid field and defence in the last two seasons, two years would make him 34 not to old unless injury prone, which he is not. So his loss has to be considered of doubtful use going forward.
|
|
|
Originally posted by ambrose7
A 2 year contract means Kouyate is another player at AFCON 2023 (in January 2024). We are at risk of Doucoure, Kouyate, Olise, Eze, Zaha, Schlupp and Ayew all being at that tournament. That is a huge reason not to give him a 2 year contract. I thought he was going to sign for a club in Middle East?
“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn |
|
|
Originally posted by PatrickA
Kouyate is rarely injured, doesn't carry excess weight and shows no sign of slowing down or lacking fitness.
|
|
|
Originally posted by ambrose7
A 2 year contract means Kouyate is another player at AFCON 2023 (in January 2024). We are at risk of Doucoure, Kouyate, Olise, Eze, Zaha, Schlupp and Ayew all being at that tournament. That is a huge reason not to give him a 2 year contract. Zaha, Schlupp, Ayew, contracts end before Jan 24 Eze Olise, as of yet do not play for African nations. So any decisions at that time go well beyond keeping Kouyate or not.
|
|
|
Originally posted by ambrose7
A 2 year contract means Kouyate is another player at AFCON 2023 (in January 2024). We are at risk of Doucoure, Kouyate, Olise, Eze, Zaha, Schlupp and Ayew all being at that tournament. That is a huge reason not to give him a 2 year contract. Why would Eze be at the Afcon? He will be in the England setup by then
|
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Why would Eze be at the Afcon? He will be in the England setup by then[. Olise will be aiming for the French team/quote]
|
|
|
Originally posted by BelfastEagle
Why a smart move ? He has left he has no contract that’s it. If he comes back then he’s a new signing. Because they left the door open for him to change his mind. He's not going to get a 2 year deal so that's why he ran his contract down however he may decide that better the devil... in which case we can re-sign him with minimum fuss on the deal he originally rejected. It may not happen but who knows.
One more point |
|
|
The trouble with making exceptions is that from then on every case wants to be viewed as an exception - With regards to Kouyate I am surprised he hasn't found somewhere in the time that this stalemate has been going on as you would think with his attributes (as you have pointed out below) someone else out there would be only too keen to offer him 2 years. Originally posted by PatrickA
Kouyate is rarely injured, doesn't carry excess weight and shows no sign of slowing down or lacking fitness.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Bullhorn76
Has dazza slipped down the back of a couch or something? ,although the links/rumours have been sparse on Twitter lately hence why Reliable D hasn’t been around as much……. Or because there is nothing happening!
|
|
|
Originally posted by BelfastEagle
Why a smart move ? He has left he has no contract that’s it. If he comes back then he’s a new signing. Still registered with us I guess?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Dubai Eagle
The trouble with making exceptions is that from then on every case wants to be viewed as an exception - With regards to Kouyate I am surprised he hasn't found somewhere in the time that this stalemate has been going on as you would think with his attributes (as you have pointed out below) someone else out there would be only too keen to offer him 2 years. Hmm, I see no floodgate issue here. 2/3 players a season will be able to make that case; only if they want to; and the club will consider it on its merits. 2 years works well with me for Kouyate. Does not take him past Jimmy Mac's age (or does it?).
|
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Why would Eze be at the Afcon? He will be in the England setup by then And Kouyate would be an important but fringe player by then.
|
|
|
I think it depends upon how its been integrated - if its a cast iron rule or if its a guideline consideration where there is the possibility where every case is decided upon its merits - in which case who decided which merits are more relevant ? As others have said how will they handle the Zaha situation, perhaps offer him a new deal whilst still 29 ? Additionally how many other guideline rulings are there (that we haven't heard about within the club) which could be effected by either upholding or an eroding of this one ? Difficult to say - But at the moment it seems as though the club is insisting on it being a one year deal & presumably the player is insisting that he wants more security than that - bit of a stalemate but the clock is ticking / the season is starting & presumably the club have a plan to go forward without him if necessary. Originally posted by silvertop
Hmm, I see no floodgate issue here. 2/3 players a season will be able to make that case; only if they want to; and the club will consider it on its merits. 2 years works well with me for Kouyate. Does not take him past Jimmy Mac's age (or does it?).
|
|
|
Originally posted by Dubai Eagle
I think it depends upon how its been integrated - if its a cast iron rule or if its a guideline consideration where there is the possibility where every case is decided upon its merits - in which case who decided which merits are more relevant ? As others have said how will they handle the Zaha situation, perhaps offer him a new deal whilst still 29 ? Additionally how many other guideline rulings are there (that we haven't heard about within the club) which could be effected by either upholding or an eroding of this one ? Difficult to say - But at the moment it seems as though the club is insisting on it being a one year deal & presumably the player is insisting that he wants more security than that - bit of a stalemate but the clock is ticking / the season is starting & presumably the club have a plan to go forward without him if necessary. I don’t the bit about wanting security? He has played in the Premier for 8 years, guessing his average wage over that period is £50k a week, he will of earnt £20m in wages. I don’t think he needs to worry about security.
|
|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
Hmm, I see no floodgate issue here. 2/3 players a season will be able to make that case; only if they want to; and the club will consider it on its merits. 2 years works well with me for Kouyate. Does not take him past Jimmy Mac's age (or does it?). I guess it also depends on if the club think we'll need him season after this. CD has effectively taken his CDM place. With Richards, we also now have some CB cover. If we continue to recruit well, there is a good chance that he wont make that bench let alone the team in 23/34.
|
|
|
Certainly some valid points made earlier & below - it will be interesting to see how it unfolds - Originally posted by MrRobbo
I guess it also depends on if the club think we'll need him season after this. CD has effectively taken his CDM place. With Richards, we also now have some CB cover. If we continue to recruit well, there is a good chance that he wont make that bench let alone the team in 23/34.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Painter
Or because there is nothing happening! I'm in the know about Dazza. Heard a rumour, from my source, he went to Clacton on his hols. I'll post an update.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.