This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
 Part Time James  15 Aug 17 8.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
UK will 'mirror' much of EU customs system for Brexit, plans reveal. No point in brexit at all. Let's mirror all of it....... Yes. Isn't that exactly what the repeal act is? Only going forward we can change the foundational rules without ratification from someone in Belgium?
|
|
| Stirlingsays 15 Aug 17 8.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
If it Leaves with a capital 'L'. Brexit lite seems to be gaining traction as rhetoric and blind and destructive ideology quietens and common sense come to the fore. Even Foxy has had some reality checks about Hard. Hard, light, peanut favoured....kind of meaninglessness terms. People by and large voted to stop freedom of movement. Apparently the EU....unlike in the past....want to have this as some kind of red line requirement.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Kermit8  Hevon 15 Aug 17 8.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Part Time James
For a long time I wanted a Hard Brexit. That's not changed, I don't want a Soft Brexit, but I wondered whether it's just a marketing issue and if it was renamed "Sensual Brexit" then everyone might finally unite and get behind it? Thoughts? Can't. Copyright infringement. She's on Channel 941 at 10.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Kermit8 Hevon 15 Aug 17 8.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Hard, light, peanut favoured....kind of meaninglessness terms. People by and large voted to stop freedom of movement. Apparently the EU....unlike in the past....want to have this as some kind of red line requirement.
I still reckon that if it were down to the two - having EU net migration or non-EU net migration - with both roughly the same numerically, that the former would win by a huge landslide. Irony is of course is that we are losing the former but keeping the latter which will probably increase a fair bit in order to fill the gaps left by Brexit.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 15 Aug 17 10.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
'If it walks, talks and acts like a duck then guess what, it's a duck.' If she walks, talks and acts like Jimmy Krankie then guess what, she is Jimmy Krankie.
|
|
| Stirlingsays 15 Aug 17 10.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
I still reckon that if it were down to the two - having EU net migration or non-EU net migration - with both roughly the same numerically, that the former would win by a huge landslide. Irony is of course is that we are losing the former but keeping the latter which will probably increase a fair bit in order to fill the gaps left by Brexit. Well, if the ponzi scheme on population growth just continues at the same pace a few years after Brexit then the bell will toll for those that allow it. It's a ponzi scheme and unsustainable.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 15 Aug 17 10.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
No, no ruffled feathers. Just taking the p1ss because she looks identical to Jimmy Krankie. Do you know what these proposals are/mean? I bet plenty don't.
COYP |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 15 Aug 17 11.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
No, no ruffled feathers. Just taking the p1ss because she looks identical to Jimmy Krankie. Do you know what these proposals are/mean? I bet plenty don't. A shame because although there is a resemblance it's repeatedly trotted out . This means people think Krankie, rather than SNP policies (which should be important in a democracy) when Sturgeon is mentioned in sections of the media to deliberately divert away from the important stuff.
|
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Aug 17 12.01am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Well, if the ponzi scheme on population growth just continues at the same pace a few years after Brexit then the bell will toll for those that allow it. It's a ponzi scheme and unsustainable. Be an unintended consequence of Brexit for the Alf Garnetts of this fine country if it meant there was an influx of coloureds to fill in the gaps left by those horrid Europeans leaving the UK.
|
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 16 Aug 17 12.13am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
A shame because although there is a resemblance it's repeatedly trotted out . This means people think Krankie, rather than SNP policies (which should be important in a democracy) when Sturgeon is mentioned in sections of the media to deliberately divert away from the important stuff. Don't watch Mock the Week then?
COYP |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Aug 17 12.21am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Don't watch Mock the Week then? Is that the one with all the young comics who are all called Russell on it?
|
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 23 Aug 17 11.52am |
|
|---|---|
|
Compromise on EU court jurisdiction. That'll go down well with the British rule for British people mob.
|
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 23 Aug 17 12.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Compromise on EU court jurisdiction. That'll go down well with the British rule for British people mob. 'Compromise' LOL. If there are aspects of European law that it would be in our interests to conform to, then of course we should.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Mr_Gristle In the land of Whelk Eaters 23 Aug 17 1.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
'Compromise' LOL. If there are aspects of European law that it would be in our interests to conform to, then of course we should. Like the ECJ and ECHR, you mean? Or what about EU food labelling standards (which are of genuine benefit to the consumer)? I thought the Brexit camp couldn't wait to "take back control" and free itself from the shackles of the Eurocracy.....
Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune) |
|
| Stirlingsays 23 Aug 17 1.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mr_Gristle
Like the ECJ and ECHR, you mean? Or what about EU food labelling standards (which are of genuine benefit to the consumer)? I thought the Brexit camp couldn't wait to "take back control" and free itself from the shackles of the Eurocracy..... I'm not really seeing a contradiction. We helped create and agreed with many of those regulations and standards. But by not being apart of it we can change what parliament don't agree with.....that's always going to be a tiny fraction.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 23 Aug 17 4.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I'm not really seeing a contradiction. We helped create and agreed with many of those regulations and standards. But by not being apart of it we can change what parliament don't agree with.....that's always going to be a tiny fraction. There is no contradiction Stirling. We can make our own laws, rules and regulations. If we choose to comply with some existing EU laws, rules and regulations because it is in our interests to do so, fine.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| chris123 hove actually 23 Aug 17 4.47pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Haha can't believe it. The only thing left for the brexiteers is 'taking back control' now that is gone too. Be far better off staying in the EU with the power of the veto. What can't you believe?
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.