This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
glaziermart ![]() |
|
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'New owners imminent?' by bexleydave Looks like something could happen soon
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'New owners imminent?' by bexleydave Not sure what's new - we've known for a while Blitzer and Harris wanted out.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'New owners imminent?' by bexleydave I saw this earlier today it doesn’t say anything we don’t already know that the club is up for sale, it says it’s not from the club but like you I hope something will happens soon. Edited by Bud (01 Oct 2019 8.30pm)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'New owners imminent?' by bexleydave I believe Tux & Willo are making a joint bid of Bitcoins from Tux & Willo's Esso World Cup 1970 Coin Collection
Pro USA & Israel |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'New owners imminent?' by bexleydave This only details the conditions of what the Americans want to sell, nothing about an actual buyer. Doubt anything's actually imminent as much as I'd like it to be The interesting bit to me is from the wording it seems like Parish wants out too
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'New owners imminent?' by bexleydave Originally posted by Jimenez
I believe Tux & Willo are making a joint bid of Bitcoins from Tux & Willo's Esso World Cup 1970 Coin Collection I think Tux will end up as the major shareholder!
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'New owners imminent?' by bexleydave Zenith!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by TheArmaniCode
My reading is the opposite as it says that up to 90% is for sale which implies that Parish wants to hang on to a shareholding which is why I don't think he will find a buyer. No wealthy buyer will pay that amount for a shareholding and pump tens of millions into the club on top of that without having complete control
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
It's a fairly specific document, so I would say this is a very determined effort by them to get shot of us from their portfolio. We need it done ASAP because I'm sure they'll be reluctant to sanction spending of any sort while they remain. I'm not saying they'll be outright 'no' but they're sure to add a big time layer. Personally, I think they signed Benteke and Sakho. And I think those were two gargantuan mistakes.
If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
My reading is the opposite as it says that up to 90% is for sale which implies that Parish wants to hang on to a shareholding which is why I don't think he will find a buyer. No wealthy buyer will pay that amount for a shareholding and pump tens of millions into the club on top of that without having complete control You don't need 100% for complete control, 51% will give you compete control, you can't then be out voted for anything you want to do, I once had 49% of a company, apart from dividends it might as well have been 1% and I didn't have a say in the amount of dividends.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by ARGILE OLD GEEZER
True but if a new investor provides enough cash to rebuild the stadium and buy a team good enough for a place in Europe the value of the club will soar and with it the value of the minority shareholding
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by ARGILE OLD GEEZER
You don't need 100% for complete control, 51% will give you compete control, you can't then be out voted for anything you want to do, I once had 49% of a company, apart from dividends it might as well have been 1% and I didn't have a say in the amount of dividends. Can you go to the brexit thread and post these as facts.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.