You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Bias against Trump
November 6 2026 2.30pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Bias against Trump


Page 52 of 344 < 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 >
wordup Flag 03 Jan 18 8.59pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

If you think Mueller has anything significant then I think you are guilty of wishful thinking and naivety.

You say I shouldn't second guess Mueller and then the tone of your post shows you've decided it yourself.

My reasoning is based purely on common sense..
..one that these things would always get leaked...and that the length of time and amount of money spent on this already....and the result....A lot of hot air.

If he had been guilty of provable collusion the leaks would have been amongst us long ago.....these claims are pretty old. This guy's team has hardly been noted for being unbiased.....if there was anything significant that was worthy of impeachment this would be known by now.

I regard the whole episode as ridiculous and all just a semi on ride for democrats and those republicans who hate Trump.

If you think that indictments aren't coming down the line for family, the likes of Kushner or Trump jr then you had better reach for the popcorn. He's working his way up the chain because that's how serious investigations work.

Of course once that happens, we'll just get 'it's a witch hunt' style talk instead. But 'common sense' tells us that it will happen, and in all likelihood we won't have to wait that long for it.


 

Ray in Houston Flag Houston 03 Jan 18 9.06pm

Originally posted by wordup

If you think that indictments aren't coming down the line for family, the likes of Kushner or Trump jr then you had better reach for the popcorn. He's working his way up the chain because that's how serious investigations work.

Of course once that happens, we'll just get 'it's a witch hunt' style talk instead. But 'common sense' tells us that it will happen, and in all likelihood we won't have to wait that long for it.


Mueller has already got a plea deal from Flynn and indictments against Trump's campaign manager and deputy campaign manager.

The additional conviction of Papadopoulos is not insignificant in that he was - despite misdirection to the contrary - heavily engaged in the campaign and also, as we now know, the catalyst for the whole FBI investigation. Back in 2016, he got drunk in a London pub and started spouting off about the campaign having email dirt on Clinton. An Australian diplomat overheard him and the Aussies dropped a dime on him to their US counterparts and the FBI was put on the case.

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Stirlingsays Flag 03 Jan 18 9.12pm

Originally posted by wordup

If you think that indictments aren't coming down the line for family, the likes of Kushner or Trump jr then you had better reach for the popcorn. He's working his way up the chain because that's how serious investigations work.

Of course once that happens, we'll just get 'it's a witch hunt' style talk instead. But 'common sense' tells us that it will happen, and in all likelihood we won't have to wait that long for it.


Of course it's a witch hunt.....talking to the Russians! Wow....The amount of s***e that politicians get up to...and you take this seriously.

Trump is going nowhere from this.....and that's called common sense.

The good thing is that time will show which of us had better judgement on this matter.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

wordup Flag 03 Jan 18 9.27pm

Originally posted by Ray in Houston


Mueller has already got a plea deal from Flynn and indictments against Trump's campaign manager and deputy campaign manager.

The additional conviction of Papadopoulos is not insignificant in that he was - despite misdirection to the contrary - heavily engaged in the campaign and also, as we now know, the catalyst for the whole FBI investigation. Back in 2016, he got drunk in a London pub and started spouting off about the campaign having email dirt on Clinton. An Australian diplomat overheard him and the Aussies dropped a dime on him to their US counterparts and the FBI was put on the case.

Where there's potential interference by unelected citizens working with foreign powers, I am relieved that the investigation roll on. That the Mueller investigation has not yet been defanged, despite successes in doing so with the other investigations, should be a relief to both republicans and democrats interested in preserving the rule of law and democratic processes.


 

Ray in Houston Flag Houston 03 Jan 18 9.33pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Of course it's a witch hunt.....talking to the Russians! Wow....The amount of s***e that politicians get up to...and you take this seriously.


Getting - or attempting to get - something of value (opposition research) from a foreign power is against the law. Don Jr. has already admitted to doing this by his own voluntary disclosures, dragging Kushner and Manafort along with him.

Crimes have been committed; charges brought and convictions handed down. All of this adds up to this being the very opposite of a witch hunt.

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

wordup Flag 03 Jan 18 9.54pm

Originally posted by Ray in Houston


Getting - or attempting to get - something of value (opposition research) from a foreign power is against the law. Don Jr. has already admitted to doing this by his own voluntary disclosures, dragging Kushner and Manafort along with him.

Crimes have been committed; charges brought and convictions handed down. All of this adds up to this being the very opposite of a witch hunt.

It's important to add that the possibility that much of this happened while they were private citizens is what is important. If, in that position you are found to have a dubious amount of connections to hacked documents about an opponent and work to use or spread this, or engage in online propaganda strategies with a foreign government that indeed is very serious. Or if you receive something or offer something in exchange for 'help' from a foreign government. All of these are angles that Mueller is obviously investigating. This is being called 'Stupid Watergate' for a reason. He has so far been no shortage of reasons to indict and when those at the centre of this are found to be repeatedly lying until something new comes out, it doesn't do their cause much good.


 

Stirlingsays Flag 03 Jan 18 9.55pm

Originally posted by Ray in Houston


Getting - or attempting to get - something of value (opposition research) from a foreign power is against the law. Don Jr. has already admitted to doing this by his own voluntary disclosures, dragging Kushner and Manafort along with him.

Crimes have been committed; charges brought and convictions handed down. All of this adds up to this being the very opposite of a witch hunt.

It's precisely what a witch hunt is. Nothing that has been done there is of any significance at all....it's a joke in a world where Clinton had that email server and was then cleared....an absolute joke and a witch hunt.

A load of money throw at one aim....taking Trump out....a act against democracy that would lead to serious repercussions. You're just an unknown cheerleader for that aim.

You stated on here that Trump will go. I've said he won't. I'm going to enjoy watching your hubris laid bare.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Ray in Houston Flag Houston 03 Jan 18 10.12pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

It's precisely what a witch hunt is. Nothing that has been done there is of any significance at all....it's a joke in a world where Clinton had that email server and was then cleared....an absolute joke and a witch hunt.

A load of money throw at one aim....taking Trump out....a act against democracy that would lead to serious repercussions. You're just an unknown cheerleader for that aim.

You stated on here that Trump will go. I've said he won't. I'm going to enjoy watching your hubris laid bare.


I'm going to watch with interest the continued activity of the Mueller investigation. I don't give a f*** what you do.

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

kenbarr Flag Jackson Heights, Queens, New York ... 03 Jan 18 11.48pm

Originally posted by Ray in Houston


I'm going to watch with interest the continued activity of the Mueller investigation. I don't give a f*** what you do.

We Americans are kind of funny about foreign powers trying to influence our elections, especially when they hack into our files. I would remind all and sundry that the Watergate investigations lasted over two years. This has been going on for less than one.

 


Divorced...And LOVING it!
VJRAM Rev.
CPFC since Boxing Day 1989 CPFC 2-2 CFC
Gregg Berhalter, US International & USMNT Head Coach
Jill Ellis, England International & Retired USWNT Head Coach
Trevor Francis, International PRAT

wordup Flag 04 Jan 18 2.13am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Of course it's a witch hunt.....talking to the Russians! Wow....The amount of s***e that politicians get up to...and you take this seriously.

Trump is going nowhere from this.....and that's called common sense.

The good thing is that time will show which of us had better judgement on this matter.

Well it's a witch hunt of course and so even if Trump steps down or is impeached whatever is unearthed will be deemed irrelevant anyway. You're laying the groundwork.

 

twist Flag Miami, Florida 04 Jan 18 4.29am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

It's precisely what a witch hunt is. Nothing that has been done there is of any significance at all....it's a joke in a world where Clinton had that email server and was then cleared....an absolute joke and a witch hunt.

A load of money throw at one aim....taking Trump out....a act against democracy that would lead to serious repercussions. You're just an unknown cheerleader for that aim.

You stated on here that Trump will go. I've said he won't. I'm going to enjoy watching your hubris laid bare.

Clinton Email server issue ? your kidding me right ? What about Governor scott, who when petitioned via the correct channels to release his emails of the previous 3 1/2 years, the backups had magically disappeared ?
Then there have been multiple senators found to be using private email servers also, yet we still concentrate on Clinton, despite all those emails being able to be viewed by the FBI, who found only that she was pretty dumb to use a private server, and nothing else.

Bannon, reportedly, has said it right, treason has been committed, and the real sh!t is close to hitting the fan. Get ready for a war with North Korea, because thats what presidents do when things go south for them.

And just how democratic an election was it ? when so much fake news was thrown out there in the weeks leading upto the election, including the FBI flub that probably cost Clinton the presidency.

 

twist Flag Miami, Florida 04 Jan 18 4.34am

And to continue, many of the guys i work with are pretty hard core republics. They hated Obama with passion.
They voted trump, and were so happy and surprised when he won.
But all but 1 of them feel he is guilty of dealing with the Russians and probably will not and should not survive the eventual fallout. They maybe hardcore republicans, but they are Americans, and the word "Russian" is still a dirty word for them.

Pence is not a bad guy, at lease i can just disagree with his policies but i dont think i can doubt his patriotism, or statesmanship.

 

Stirlingsays Flag 04 Jan 18 4.50am

Originally posted by Ray in Houston


I'm going to watch with interest the continued activity of the Mueller investigation. I don't give a f*** what you do.

Well, I'm going to be ridiculing your hubris, so that's just as well.

Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Jan 2018 4.50am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Stirlingsays Flag 04 Jan 18 5.05am

Originally posted by twist

Clinton Email server issue ? your kidding me right ? What about Governor scott, who when petitioned via the correct channels to release his emails of the previous 3 1/2 years, the backups had magically disappeared ?
Then there have been multiple senators found to be using private email servers also, yet we still concentrate on Clinton, despite all those emails being able to be viewed by the FBI, who found only that she was pretty dumb to use a private server, and nothing else.

Bannon, reportedly, has said it right, treason has been committed, and the real sh!t is close to hitting the fan. Get ready for a war with North Korea, because thats what presidents do when things go south for them.

And just how democratic an election was it ? when so much fake news was thrown out there in the weeks leading upto the election, including the FBI flub that probably cost Clinton the presidency.

Nice whataboutery.

Why should I care about a Governor Scott? I'm not a republican. Clinton was secretary of state....not a bleeding governor.....the scale of what she had access to doesn't even come close.

My point is entirely a criticism of selective political interference. People obsessing over the corruptions that they want to come true because they hope it results in the undemocratic political outcome they want.....unseating a president they don't like....and all over what....his team talking dirt with the Russians? The amount of crap the democrats have spoken over this has shown me....if I hadn't already seen...that they are no better than the tea party that dogged Obama and the politicians who looked to impeach a president for a sodding blow job.

An election was held, a president was chosen. I'm not someone who supports this kind of opposition. I prefer criticism of policies rather than trying to unseat a president undemocratically.

If he's done something dramatically wrong then prove it.....I await the conclusion....After it, there will be people to criticise either way.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

wordup Flag 04 Jan 18 10.05am

Trump attorney sends Bannon cease and desist letter over 'disparaging' comments - [Link]

Quote During the campaign, then-candidate Trump had all campaign staff sign a non-disclosure agreement which required all staff, according to campaign sources, to refrain from any disparaging comments against the candidate, his family or the Trump campaign and organization.

One for the newly minted freedom of speech fans lol. Of course what's amusing is that bringing Wollf in and have him conduct 100+ interviews with people appears to have had the presidents approval at the time. How remarkably stupid to do such a thing if you want potentially very dodgy behaviour to go unquestioned. Bannon doesn't need to say another word. It's deckstairs on the titanic time so he can hardly be blamed for telling it like it is.

Quote Wolff, who chronicles the administration from Election Day to this past October, conducted conversations and interviews over a period of 18 months with the president, most members of his senior staff, and many people to whom they in turn spoke. Shortly after Trump’s inauguration, Wolff says, he was able to take up “something like a semi-permanent seat on a couch in the West Wing”—an idea encouraged by the president himself. Because no one was in a position to either officially approve or formally deny such access, Wolff became “more a constant interloper than an invited guest.” There were no ground rules placed on his access, and he was required to make no promises about how he would report on what he witnessed.

He appears to be employing people to simply tell him what he wants to hear, which is all well and good, but not with your own legal team where you might get brought down by your own behaviour due to the level of scrutiny involved in this role. And accusing someone of communicating disparaging information which at the same time saying they've 'lost their mind' isn't always a good move. If he takes legal action there will be of course be the discovery phase of evidence collection on both sides. This man doesn't need others to bring him down, it's always amateur hour with Trump.

Edited by wordup (04 Jan 2018 10.39am)

 

wordup Flag 04 Jan 18 10.22am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Nice whataboutery.

Why should I care about a Governor Scott? I'm not a republican. Clinton was secretary of state....not a bleeding governor.....the scale of what she had access to doesn't even come close.


And trump is 'bleeding president'. Clinton isn't.

Nice whataboutery.

Comey went the extra mile on the Clinton front and doing so arguably even tipped the election. Of course not a peep from people when Trump is even on video saying that he fired Comey because of the, apparently imaginary, 'Russia stuff'.


Edited by wordup (04 Jan 2018 10.41am)

 

Stirlingsays Flag 04 Jan 18 1.04pm

Originally posted by wordup

And trump is 'bleeding president'. Clinton isn't.


Nice whataboutery.

Clinton was a president and hence it's an accurate comparison on the behaviour of activists against them.

It isn't whataboutery as it's answering a 'whataboutery' point by making an actual comparison involving presidents.

Originally posted by wordup

Comey went the extra mile on the Clinton front and doing so arguably even tipped the election. Of course not a peep from people when Trump is even on video saying that he fired Comey because of the, apparently imaginary, 'Russia stuff'.

Edited by wordup (04 Jan 2018 10.41am)

Comey made a judgement on the Clinton emails that made no sense to me. Comey came across quite well in my view but that's just a view.

I don't comment that much on what Trump does unless it's actually under discussion. I spend most of my time criticising the hopelessly biased commentators against him.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

wordup Flag 04 Jan 18 2.29pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Comey made a judgement on the Clinton emails that made no sense to me. Comey came across quite well in my view but that's just a view.

I don't comment that much on what Trump does unless it's actually under discussion. I spend most of my time criticising the hopelessly biased commentators against him.

That will be because you're very well aligned with his particular brand of identity politics.

 

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 04 Jan 18 2.48pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Comey made a judgement on the Clinton emails that made no sense to me. Comey came across quite well in my view but that's just a view.

I don't comment that much on what Trump does unless it's actually under discussion. I spend most of my time criticising the hopelessly biased commentators against him.

Oddly I think they're kind of protecting him. All the talk about collusion and dumb things he says, and has pretty much protected him from what is likely to be a serious scandal involving money laundering for the Russians, that may have been going on for a decade.

The issue isn't really going to be what you like or don't like about the guy, but what the FBI can pin in terms of criminal charges - and thats looking very much like money laundering, tax and declaration offences relating to foriegn investments, and lying to the FBI / Under oath etc.

Its gone too far for the FBI not to press charges on something against very senior members of the administration - and I'd be astounded if there isn't anything to find in terms of financial misdeeds and illegal business practices.

My bet is that it'll be more about financial activity before even entering the primaries - and that the 'election stuff' turns out to be more something the Russians did in return for the laundering, rather than something more nefarious like 'treason'.

I suspect that he'll be hung out to dry, by others who had a more direct hand in the cookie jar. He's a 71 year old man, who even if the arrests were all done and dusted by tomorrow, could likely spend the next five years before a trial proper - with a number of options available to even avoid standing trial on grounds of ill health etc.

I'll be surprised, even if found guilty, that he'll spend any time in prison. He's the perfect 'fall guy', old, dumb and possibly 'mentally incompetent'.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Stirlingsays Flag 04 Jan 18 2.55pm

Originally posted by wordup

That will be because you're very well aligned with his particular brand of identity politics.

Really?

I'm with him on immigration and nationalism but there are plenty of Trump policies I'm against.

Are you conflating nationalism with racial identity?

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Page 52 of 344 < 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Bias against Trump