Come on, you can't really believe that the media is pro-remain - look at the Mail, Express, Telegraph, Sun - those are the principle drivers for Leave.

You often seem to regard the way people voted as a mark of their identity, rather than a vote. There is still no real clarity on how things are going to be any better after Brexit, so is it any wonder MPs think it's better to stay?

Every Central Bank is privately owned.

Buy Litecoin.

Your question is short-form for why I think party politics is a problem. As a party politician, you'd have to back positions you disagree with or risking getting it from the whips.

If I was an MP, I'd always want to vote on what I think will be best for the country and the community. Problem is, I don't think either are very good at distinguishing between wants and needs.

Currently, and just for the record, 4,300%.

..........with no tenants, agency fees or grief.

Buy Litecoin.

What was the point of a referendum then if the MPs are going to disregard the result

It certainly wasn't sold to the public as such.

It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.

That's just another in the long list of problems associated with it.

Number one for me is that it was not a vote for anything, just against the EU. Until there is a mandate as to what alternatives were available, we shouldn't have had a vote.

Or at least, it should have been the first in a series - ie, is there an appetite to leave? Well, that could have been the first vote. At which point the government sets up task forces to see what that could look like before starting the process on any of them. Puts the options to the people - stay, go on these terms.

Would have been better for everyone I think.

I think you are correct but the government was so anti Brexit that I'm not sure that we could have trusted them to set up an impartial task force.

Even now, we are only hearing of the negative aspects of Brexit but I suppose this will always be the case until we know what, if any, positives there are.

I hope that in 10 years time, we will be outside the EU, looking at it getting more and more political and bureaucratic (and expensive) and thinking thank feck that we are out of that and that £50 billion was cheap.

It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.

Has anyone noticed that Brexit has basically turned our government into (even more) pandering sycophants? In desperation to get a deal with countries like the US, out leaders are forced into doing nothing more than simpering to nations across the world, with offers which will involve a selling off of our sovereignty and our dignity in order to achieve some sort of trade deal, which in most cases will be stacked in the favour of the other side.

This is no better demonstrated by May's complete inability to properly rebuke Trump following his racist tweeting and his subsequent slap down of our PM. The fact that she won't revoke his offer of a state visit and that she even made it in the first place is a sign of how insipid and weak our government has become.

It's embarrassing and looks weak.

If we were staying in the EU her, Boris and Gove might not have had to be such a sycophants, climbing over one another to blow smoke up Trump's a*se.

Remainers will try anything to reverse Brexit. Anything. Ban the president from a low key visit, trade deals, engineer shyte deals with the EU or anyone else. Exaggerate anything else they can find. Anything.

Whenever anyone wants to stop something these days it's usually because they're remain.

COYP