You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
October 27 2026 5.13pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)


Page 549 of 1552 < 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 >
Stirlingsays Flag 02 Feb 18 9.37am

Originally posted by steeleye20

'All that’s saying is that no deal would be just as harmful to the EU as it would to us; which is correct. The economic knock on effects globally could feasibly see us back into 2008 territory'

That from DanH and its right.

But the simple answer is simply not to do brexit at all.

Then those bad things will not happen.

Dump it.

Nope.......we don't like the EU......We don't like no control of our borders nor being apart of their ever closer political and economic union.

Bye bye EU.

We shall defend Europe if required, we won't defend the EU.

Edited by Stirlingsays (02 Feb 2018 9.37am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 02 Feb 18 10.12am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Nope.......we don't like the EU......We don't like no control of our borders nor being apart of their ever closer political and economic union.

Bye bye EU.

We shall defend Europe if required, we won't defend the EU.

Edited by Stirlingsays (02 Feb 2018 9.37am)

'We shall defend Europe if required'

Thank you Stirling and brexiteers, for that!!!!

By leaving the EU we end up defending Europe?

Ludicrous position.

 

matt_himself Flag Matataland 02 Feb 18 10.52am

Originally posted by steeleye20

'We shall defend Europe if required'

Thank you Stirling and brexiteers, for that!!!!

By leaving the EU we end up defending Europe?

Ludicrous position.

No it’s not.

If we were in a ‘Common Market’ with our European partners, then I would have voted to stay in that.

However, we are in a ‘Union’ that is attempting ecomonic, political and military union against the democratic will of the people.

We as a nation voted against being used from Brussels by a group of unelected commissioners.

If our European partners were invaded or attacked, we would defend them as that is entirely different from being locked into the US of E against our will.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

matt_himself Flag Matataland 02 Feb 18 10.53am

Originally posted by DanH

All that’s saying is that no deal would be just as harmful to the EU as it would to us; which is correct. The economic knock on effects globally could feasibly see us back into 2008 territory.

Both sides need to put their cocks away and get a sensible solution in place.

I said I agreed with he article and that a no deal looks attractive at the moment.

I stick with that.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 02 Feb 18 10.58am

Originally posted by matt_himself

I agree with this article:

[Link]

I thought Brexiteers thought all forecasts were baloney?

The premise in this article is not crazy, but reliant on a couple of big factors which are not in our favour, one being we have David Davis running the DExEU department and he's a moron and we have May running a weak government without a majority for this kind of Brexit. Furthermore the EU has other things to think about which it may consider more important than the economic damage to certain industries and that's the integrity of the whole bloc. This is a good article from a Dutch journalist:

[Link]

It's a bit like Sophie's choice for the EU.

I agree that if we are going to do Brexit we should be going for a proper Brexit otherwise what's the point, and it's clear a Soft Brexit is worse than no Brexit. The lack of clarity on this pre-referendum and lack of planning has made this into a massive mess and I'd prefer it if we started this whole process again and Dodgy Dave and useless Theresa were allowed no part of it.

 

matt_himself Flag Matataland 02 Feb 18 11.07am

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle

I thought Brexiteers thought all forecasts were baloney?

The premise in this article is not crazy, but reliant on a couple of big factors which are not in our favour, one being we have David Davis running the DExEU department and he's a moron and we have May running a weak government without a majority for this kind of Brexit. Furthermore the EU has other things to think about which it may consider more important than the economic damage to certain industries and that's the integrity of the whole bloc. This is a good article from a Dutch journalist:

[Link]

It's a bit like Sophie's choice for the EU.

I agree that if we are going to do Brexit we should be going for a proper Brexit otherwise what's the point, and it's clear a Soft Brexit is worse than no Brexit. The lack of clarity on this pre-referendum and lack of planning has made this into a massive mess and I'd prefer it if we started this whole process again and Dodgy Dave and useless Theresa were allowed no part of it.

I agree with you. Rees-Mogg should be leading our negotiations.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 02 Feb 18 11.10am

Originally posted by .TUX.

As with every POTUS before him, Obama 'stimulised' diddly. Money printed from thin-air and thrown by the barrel load to Wall Street is irrelevant. It's a casino.
Obama (give or take the odd farthing) 'borrowed' more than every single POTUS before him, ie DOUBLED THE 'FRIGGIN DEBT.........and things are still bad. That must tell you something.
As with every (PRIVATELY OWNED) Central Bank, policy is dictated by them, and only ever for THEIR benefit.



By whom?


FYI when Obama came in in 2008 general government debt was 93.1% of GDP and was 106.4% of GDP a year later, given the GFC and policies put in place by the Bush administration there was limited amounts he could have done about this debt figure.

He pursued a (reasonably modest) fiscal stimulus package which helped massively to improve the US economy. Monetary policy is determined by the Fed. US Debt to GDP in 2016 was 126.9% which is not double. Looking at absolute values is totally misleading and useless.

n.b. these are gross debt figures from OECD.

US GDP growth is pretty good and Obama's policies are to thank for that.

 

CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 02 Feb 18 11.11am

Originally posted by matt_himself

I agree with you. Rees-Mogg should be leading our negotiations.


I obviously disagree with that. But I do think he'd be better than Davis/May.

Electoral maths mean hard Brexit is hard to envisage.

We need a second referendum where the choices are in or hard out (not just out and then we'll sort it out after what that actually means). Then there can be no argument and no messing about.

 

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 02 Feb 18 11.17am

Originally posted by matt_himself

No it’s not.

If we were in a ‘Common Market’ with our European partners, then I would have voted to stay in that.

However, we are in a ‘Union’ that is attempting ecomonic, political and military union against the democratic will of the people.

We as a nation voted against being used from Brussels by a group of unelected commissioners.

If our European partners were invaded or attacked, we would defend them as that is entirely different from being locked into the US of E against our will.

There is no such thing as a United states of Europe as you very well know, you are just desperately living in a brexit fantasy that has no basis in real life.

 

matt_himself Flag Matataland 02 Feb 18 11.22am

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle


I obviously disagree with that. But I do think he'd be better than Davis/May.

Electoral maths mean hard Brexit is hard to envisage.

We need a second referendum where the choices are in or hard out (not just out and then we'll sort it out after what that actually means). Then there can be no argument and no messing about.

We don’t need a second referendum. We need parliament to approve the deal, or no deal, and move forward.

The referendum has happened. People decided what they wanted. Deal with it.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

matt_himself Flag Matataland 02 Feb 18 11.23am

Originally posted by steeleye20

There is no such thing as a United states of Europe as you very well know, you are just desperately living in a brexit fantasy that has no basis in real life.

What is my Brexit fantasy?

Saying that I would have backed staying in the Commkn Market as it was?

Yes, how isolationist that point of view is.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 02 Feb 18 11.36am

Originally posted by matt_himself

We don’t need a second referendum. We need parliament to approve the deal, or no deal, and move forward.

The referendum has happened. People decided what they wanted. Deal with it.


You're living in a fantasy. If they had decided what they wanted then why has the government still not announced what their plans are? Why are there still wranglings over soft vs hard brexit? There is no clear plan and the government is deeply divided. You say approve the deal - what deal? There is no deal. The government has no idea what deal it even wants, other than some sort of halfway cake and eat it unicorn scenario.

The deficiencies in the planning for and execution of the referendum has left us in limbo and without a clear mandated direction.

Your version of leaving the EU is not the same as others and therein lies the issue.

 

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 02 Feb 18 11.39am

Originally posted by matt_himself

What is my Brexit fantasy?

Saying that I would have backed staying in the Commkn Market as it was?

Yes, how isolationist that point of view is.

The United States of Europe as I said is your fantasy, there is no such thing.


 

matt_himself Flag Matataland 02 Feb 18 12.00pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

The United States of Europe as I said is your fantasy, there is no such thing.


At the moment yes but it will happen in future years and you knew what I meant.

Before the referendum, Nick Clegg said that talk of a combined EU army was rubbish yet it is happening.

The opposition leader in Germany has openly called for a Federal Europe.

The EU brings his all about by stealth and ignoring the will of people. When Ireland rejected the Lisbon Treaty, they forced agreement upon them.

Open your eyes.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 02 Feb 18 12.08pm

It is very obvious why Mrs Thatcher was so against referendums.

They are poison and this has ended up with half the country having hardly any representation in parliament.

if the country has to decide whether to leave finally, it should be at a general election.

Then the people decide and the make-up of parliament accurately reflects that decision.

Otherwise a festering divide that will go on for years perhaps decades?

 

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 02 Feb 18 12.12pm

Originally posted by matt_himself

At the moment yes but it will happen in future years and you knew what I meant.

Before the referendum, Nick Clegg said that talk of a combined EU army was rubbish yet it is happening.

The opposition leader in Germany has openly called for a Federal Europe.

The EU brings his all about by stealth and ignoring the will of people. When Ireland rejected the Lisbon Treaty, they forced agreement upon them.

Open your eyes.

'At the moment yes'

As you now admit, there is no United States of Europe.

 

CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 02 Feb 18 12.14pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

It is very obvious why Mrs Thatcher was so against referendums.

They are poison and this has ended up with half the country having hardly any representation in parliament.

if the country has to decide whether to leave finally, it should be at a general election.

Then the people decide and the make-up of parliament accurately reflects that decision.

Otherwise a festering divide that will go on for years perhaps decades?


One of the things that disgusts me about the current Tory party is their view that Theresa May should continue to deliver Brexit and then she must go as she's useless and a terrible leader. Basically they are saying she's good enough for the British public and to carry through the most important thing to happen to the country since WWII, but she's not good enough for the Tory party. The time to make that decision was on 9th June 2017 not 29th March 2019.

I'm amazed these ardent Brexit nuts aren't trying to get rid of her now. They must know she's a block to a hard Brexit and incapable of delivering a good outcome for anyone. Anyone keen on hard Brexit should be desperate for May to go and for another election/referendum that would provide a true mandate for hard Brexit.

 

matt_himself Flag Matataland 02 Feb 18 12.26pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

'At the moment yes'

As you now admit, there is no United States of Europe.

I didn’t say there was.

Are you broken?

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

matt_himself Flag Matataland 02 Feb 18 12.30pm

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle


One of the things that disgusts me about the current Tory party is their view that Theresa May should continue to deliver Brexit and then she must go as she's useless and a terrible leader. Basically they are saying she's good enough for the British public and to carry through the most important thing to happen to the country since WWII, but she's not good enough for the Tory party. The time to make that decision was on 9th June 2017 not 29th March 2019.

I'm amazed these ardent Brexit nuts aren't trying to get rid of her now. They must know she's a block to a hard Brexit and incapable of delivering a good outcome for anyone. Anyone keen on hard Brexit should be desperate for May to go and for another election/referendum that would provide a true mandate for hard Brexit.

The fact is that the Tory party disgusts you full stop, so the passive aggressive points made above betray a greater, anti-Tory, agenda.

You are partisan and are attempting to use what you portray as a reasoned assessment to bring people to your view that Brexit should be stopped at all costs.

I would have more respect for you if you admitted that.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 02 Feb 18 12.34pm

Originally posted by matt_himself

I didn’t say there was.

Are you broken?

'locked into the US of E against our will.'

From your post.

 

Page 549 of 1552 < 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic