This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by james03
If what I read was true it did - BUT only if we exercised our agreement to buy him. We could simply have said 'no thanks' to that a year down the line. Edited by james03 (25 Aug 2016 3.04am) Given his injury record, could be a blessing in...
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Chelsea will have a say where remy goes and may feel West Ham doesn't suit them. Why would they help out a club that could be competing with them for the top four?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Brentmiester_General ![]() |
|
---|---|
We're outdoing West Ham in the transfer market now days.
"We love you Palace, we f@cking hate Man U, We love you Palace, we hate the brighton too, We love you Palace we play in red 'n' blue, so f@ck you, and you ... |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by lefty27
Chelsea will have a say where remy goes and may feel West Ham doesn't suit them. Why would they help out a club that could be competing with them for the top four? Not strictly true, the player has the final say in any transfer/loan deal.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by lefty27
Chelsea will have a say where remy goes and may feel West Ham doesn't suit them. Why would they help out a club that could be competing with them for the top four? Playing Devils advocate I'm sure they remember what happened the last time they loaned us a player !
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by BelfastEagle
Playing Devils advocate I'm sure they remember what happened the last time they loaned us a player ! Yes, indeed, but that young Bamford is far from (former) abilities of Loic Rémy.
EAGLES UP! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by lefty27
Chelsea will have a say where remy goes and may feel West Ham doesn't suit them. Why would they help out a club that could be competing with them for the top four?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by BelfastEagle
Playing Devils advocate I'm sure they remember what happened the last time they loaned us a player ! I'm not sure he played much more for Norwich (I may be mistaken) than he did for us. I think Chelsea would quite happily cut there losses with him now!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
If Remy is looking for a possible permanent move at the end of the season then surely us over the Spammers ? They have a striker injury crisis, with Ayew and Carroll both crocked, as well as Sakho. He would go there but they would likely return him at the end of the season, as they would have to off load first.
“ [T]here are known knowns; there are things we know that we know.There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know. ” |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Brentmiester_General
We're outdoing West Ham in the transfer market now days. hahahaha
Dont let Cabaye go |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by james03
If what I read was true it did - BUT only if we exercised our agreement to buy him. We could simply have said 'no thanks' to that a year down the line. Edited by james03 (25 Aug 2016 3.04am) Can't really understand what the benefit is of loaning Remy rather than buying him outright? We still have to pay his wages either way but can sell him on or loan him out if he's contracted to us. It's not as though he's an unknown. Surely, it saves money in the long run? No point in keeping the redecorating fund in the bank. Let's use that until we get the builders in.
Denial is not just a river in Egypt! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Percy of Peckham
Can't really understand what the benefit is of loaning Remy rather than buying him outright? We still have to pay his wages either way but can sell him on or loan him out if he's contracted to us. It's not as though he's an unknown. Surely, it saves money in the long run? No point in keeping the redecorating fund in the bank. Let's use that until we get the builders in. It allows us to basically have him on a trial period for a year, if he performs and scores goals we buy him, if he doesn't we don't and save 10 mil.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.