This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
What a cock. If they go back to the polls those two populist parties will increase their votes. The EU is very lucky that France has such a rigged form of general elections. Agreed. Quick update on the unelected bureaucratic gobs***e...........surprise surprise, he's now apologised.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
Agreed. Quick update on the unelected bureaucratic gobs***e...........surprise surprise, he's now apologised. The last few days have been absolute gems. First the utter farce that is Italy and the shocking developments there (apparently the best excuse the Remainers can come up with is that the Italian President did what he did because he wanted to stop the markets having kittens. LOL. That went well.) And then we have good old George Soros. You truly could not make this up. A foreign Billionaire heading up a campaign to give us poor bewildered Brits another chance to vote again so that we can acknowledge how silly we were the first time around. Its beautiful. It really is. The only single doubt I have at the back of my mind, and it is perhaps more a sign of my paranoia than any logic, is wondering if these people can be this deliberately stupid? Part of me wonders if they actually want to create the chaos? But I need to ignore that voice although it has been right, on occasion, in the past. Just enjoy. That is what I keep telling myself. Edited by Matov (30 May 2018 7.05am)
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
George 'part of the problem' Soros yesterday (cue violin).......(full speech in the link)
Buy Litecoin. |
|
|
Originally posted by Sportyteacher
UKIP is finished - wiped out within recent local elections etc. They have proven to be a one-trick/leader pony under Farage who is now relishing life within 'celebritydom'. EU was always going to make negotiations as tough as possible given that too generous a deal would open the floodgates for other countries to seek a similar appetite to leave. The reality is that Brexit Govt ministers had NO evidence of impact or proper policy platform in place as was revealed come the result of the Referendum. Since then, it has been decision making made on the hoof. I wouldn't be so sure. Ukip's state of influence is entirely down to Brexit developments. Of course it's a one trick pony and that's how the vast number of its voters, including me, view it. I, along with many of its previous voters, didn't vote Ukip since the Brexit vote. But as things stand at the moment I will be voting Ukip at the next election.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
I think it would suit some remainers to have a financial crisis so they can finger point and say its only going to get worse. What is happening in Italy is a disgrace I hope they do have another election and the euro skeptic parties win a landslide. Reports today that George Sorros a foreign billionaire and Lord Adonis who has never held an elected position will launch a campaign for a 2nd referendum. I hope the public greet this with a massive yawn. Part of me wants a 2nd vote only my vote would be deal or no deal with no deal meaning we leave and keep our 40bn. I hope Mrs May takes note that the EU will be bailing out the Italians and will need our 40bn, time to turn the screw Theresa. Edited by Badger11 (30 May 2018 7.53am) Question on this - in this no deal scenario, in your opinion (we still don't know the govt's opinion btw), what would this mean for Northern Ireland and it's border with Eire? I've been trying to think of how this can be solved and (unsurprisingly) can't come up with anything.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
'Brexit means Brexit'. Except when you have remainers in charge. We could be seeing the Tories badly damage themselves and rekindle Ukip. Unless they sort it out Ukip will be coming back strong because lots of Tory voters and some Labour ones will feel they have been lied too. Ultimately perhaps that will only be positive for Corbyn.....though I might be wrong about that as there are many northern leavers who vote Labour. Edited by Stirlingsays (27 May 2018 5.07pm) Interesting report the other day suggested Labour may not need the leave voters to keep a large number of seats which voted leave. Will be interesting to see how the Labour position evolves over the next 6 months. Momentum also pushing for a debate within Labour over it's Brexit stance. Their current policy just seems to be stay one step closer to soft Brexit than the Tories. Which is frustrating and not a proper opposition stance IMO. Corbyn's best PMQs ever have been in the past 3 weeks when he's attacked the Tory Brexit shambles and constant cabinet infighting. All the while the govt postpones the debate on the withdrawal bill, Ireland and the customs bill Corbyn has an open goal in PMQs and should continue to roll them into the back of the net.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
It looks like reality is dawning upon the UK. We are to be taking part in the EU budget talks for the next 7 years and it is by invitation. What is behind it, I think that we are not leaving. If we are it is a flag-waving exercise with a close re-alignment to prevent the economic damage being too bad. Business as usual or as near as damn it, that's what the treasury needs. I do think the intervention of Mr.Soros will keep labour out of office as 65% of labour voters were remainers and were not represented by JC and labour. Labour have caused George Soros because they don't oppose the government, always being too clever by half.
|
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Question on this - in this no deal scenario, in your opinion (we still don't know the govt's opinion btw), what would this mean for Northern Ireland and it's border with Eire? I've been trying to think of how this can be solved and (unsurprisingly) can't come up with anything. No hard border. Apparently for most companies the import export documentation / tax affairs are done in the office and not at any border. That then leaves those who are smuggling or failing to declare goods. Well that goes on now in Ireland and has done since the 1920's. Even when we had a hard border we couldn't stop arms and people crossing the border. I think we can live with this to continue the Good Friday Agreement.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
No hard border. Apparently for most companies the import export documentation / tax affairs are done in the office and not at any border. That then leaves those who are smuggling or failing to declare goods. Well that goes on now in Ireland and has done since the 1920's. Even when we had a hard border we couldn't stop arms and people crossing the border. I think we can live with this to continue the Good Friday Agreement. Where are tariffs collected though? And standards checked? Checks done for rules of origin? Also things like Quotas and Embargoes? So much harder to manage if it's allowed to dissipate into the hands of private companies. HMRC have predicted this kind of "customs partnership" approach would cost UK £20bn (£350m a week). It's also been rejected by the EU. I don't know. I sense that this "simple solution" would be anything but and would be expensive to manage for UK business (and therefore consumers) (and Irish ones) and would put the GFA at risk. I don't think the EU would accept a breach of the integrity of it's market like the one you describe. It seems like a bit of a non-starter to me.
|
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Where are tariffs collected though? And standards checked? Checks done for rules of origin? Also things like Quotas and Embargoes? So much harder to manage if it's allowed to dissipate into the hands of private companies. HMRC have predicted this kind of "customs partnership" approach would cost UK £20bn (£350m a week). It's also been rejected by the EU. I don't know. I sense that this "simple solution" would be anything but and would be expensive to manage for UK business (and therefore consumers) (and Irish ones) and would put the GFA at risk. I don't think the EU would accept a breach of the integrity of it's market like the one you describe. It seems like a bit of a non-starter to me. Surely its a great opportunity to lead the world in Blockchain solutions for cross border traffic?
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
|
Originally posted by Lyons550
Surely its a great opportunity to lead the world in Blockchain solutions for cross border traffic? OK. Shall we put that in the draft legal text on the withdrawal? I'm sure the EU won't want any more details. I think that could be in the "Max Fac" option which is currently also a non-starter as it relies on things not yet in existence. I'm sure one day there could be tech to minimise border presence or even eliminate it. But I doubt we're anywhere close to that. Also we've not even started building lorry parks or improving facilities at our docks or developed an immigration policy etc., let alone started work on blockchain led customs tech!
|
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
OK. Shall we put that in the draft legal text on the withdrawal? I'm sure the EU won't want any more details. I think that could be in the "Max Fac" option which is currently also a non-starter as it relies on things not yet in existence. I'm sure one day there could be tech to minimise border presence or even eliminate it. But I doubt we're anywhere close to that. Also we've not even started building lorry parks or improving facilities at our docks or developed an immigration policy etc., let alone started work on blockchain led customs tech! lovin' the defeatist attitude...
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
OK. Shall we put that in the draft legal text on the withdrawal? I'm sure the EU won't want any more details. I think that could be in the "Max Fac" option which is currently also a non-starter as it relies on things not yet in existence. I'm sure one day there could be tech to minimise border presence or even eliminate it. But I doubt we're anywhere close to that. Also we've not even started building lorry parks or improving facilities at our docks or developed an immigration policy etc., let alone started work on blockchain led customs tech! Those pumping billions upon billions into this new technology would disagree bud.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
|
Sic semper tyrannis.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Nigel Lawson, a former chair of the Vote Leave campaign during the EU referendum and one of tens of thousands of Britons living in France, is to apply for his official French residency card. The former chancellor said he had started the process of applying for one of the cards, known as a carte de séjour, which British expatriates are being encouraged to obtain to help bolster their rights after the UK withdraws from the EU, but added that he was “not particularly worried”. Do you read tabloids? I know they are very fond of using bold to highlight their points. Nigel Lawson actually lives in France.....you kind of missed that out. He's not applying for French nationality. Also, it's a conflation to think that being anti EU means you are anti any European country. The EU is a political union a few decades old, Europe has existed for well over a thousand years. Edited by Stirlingsays (31 May 2018 4.31pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Do you read tabloids? I know they are very fond of using bold to highlight their points. Nigel Lawson actually lives in France.....you kind of missed that out. Edited by Stirlingsays (31 May 2018 4.21pm)
Oy serial poster, the post already says that. Read a post before you reply, if it is actually necessary and you can add something, before you rush into replying.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.